Summary of this comprehensive treatise:


Jesus monkey-Christ  the "Prophet" of Perfidy


"Do not resist the evil" (Mt 5:39)

The motto of all organized crimes, desperadoes, terrorists and of the "Sermon on the Mountain"!



Christianity is no religion but about organized foul play (crime) or the (attempt at the almost) perfect crime to which belongs "moral" pretence, e.g. of "love"  (to feign guilelessness), the fake of "god" (as weapon of the crime) and "religion" (become unassailable criminals) etc. So,  poor sods or (insidious) dastards (losers) can lie their defeat as "blasphemy" of their enemies.  The preys of those dastardly predators first are humans to catch as their salves. There is no more abomination in the world than Christianity!

 This file is also available as PDF, ZIP and WORD.EXE 


“For truly I (Jesus)  tell you, if you (desperadoes)  have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you." (Mt 17:20)

"We National Socialists know best that faith shifts mountains, makes history but not the laws of economy and not only the weapons. That is why we (Nazi desperadoes) know the importance of a power with a different faith. "[i]



Of whatever "color" they may be, all desperadoes have the basic credo in common: Faith shifts mountains and the truths, anyway. They believe in the triumph of will over  god, truths, reason and ethics, i.e. that everything is ("only") that what one makes  oneself and others believing. E.g., "god" is that what desperadoes exalt to pose as "god" and they even do not shrink from faking a cripple (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, name of perfidy: Jesus "Christ") to be "god"...

In a European TV broadcast, I one heard a Protestant opponent of Catholic „Opus Die" lamenting that this Catholic organized crime in one of their secret scriptures on can read: „…then we let our upholstered tanks rolling." Crucial is the term of „upholstered tanks". This wording means that what we call perfidy. This expression hardly is different from those we use about the Christians, e.g. when calling them "compassionate" brute. The adjective is the mask and the noun the real mind. Upholstery (compassion) and tanks (brutes) are contraire. The one stands for a grade of hardness like steel, ruthlessness, enforcement of one’s striving for power, the other word stands for compliancy, elasticity and convenience. Here, in this context the term of „tanks" symbolizes will to power, ruthless violence and brutality, which of course puts up with corpses, whereas „upholstery" means pretending morals (Christians’ cant: „love"). Since cruelty is faked as "morals" or even "love", it becomes driven to the utmost. If brutality is connected with perfidy it is faked as the reverse, for instance, as "charity" and "love" not only abomination is perpetrated but even the tools (terms) are robbed from the prey or victims by which they could protect themselves from evil or defeat the latter. Here, according to Mt 12:29 and Mr 3:27, in advance the victims are deprived of the arguments ("tools" or "weapons") by which they can counter those foul mouths and foul players (brutes). Presenting the mind and/or deeds of one’s own by the reverse to the benefit of one’s own, we call perfidy. . For instance, it is perfidy to pass one’s will to power off as „modesty" and „humbleness", hatred (see: Lu 14:26) off as "love" and crimes as atrocities at any price and by stopping at nothing off as "martyrdom for the truths" as the followers of perfidy (Christians) with their "upholstered tanks" are used to doing on their prey and victims. Obviously, the Protestant critic complained that Catholic organized crime of "Opus Dei" in one of its secret scriptures divulged rues and techniques of Christian warfare of hatred and vengeance that usually is a concealed matter of course to Christians. One does not divulge the secret of one’s businesses on the market… Otherwise, it does not work one day, any longer…! 

Before continuing, we want to drop some remarks about the manner we write on Christian sect that might astonish Christianly conditioned people but not those that are experienced in philosophy since. The manner, in which the author of this exposition writes does not differ from the manner, in which ancient Greek philosopher Celsus (about the year 178), Porphyry (205 – 270 C.E.) or in modern time German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (born precisely hundred years before the author of this exposition) debunked this abomination.
I see, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") was Messiah (Greek: Christos). The evidence for that purportedly is given in the Bible (Christians' cant: "Old Testament") since he allegedly matches all the features that are told, there. This means that the Bible (Christians' cant: "Old Testament") so-to-speak is Christian law of "authorization" to fob a fellow of theirs off as "god" or "god's son" and exalt themselves as "shepherd" and abase others to be their pets (Christians' cant: sheep). Since, Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera purportedly matches all the features of the Messiah that are predicted by the prophets of Judaism, Christians have the right to conquer the world by the name of Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") (see 1Joh 5:4).

Now, let us have a look what the concerned Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera tells about this "law of authorization" playing "god" of a planet:


Lu 24:24-25 NRSV

25 Then he said to them, "Oh, how foolish you are, and how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have declared!

26 Was it not necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and then enter into his glory?"





Joh 10: 8 NRSV

All (prophets) who came before me (Jesus) are thieves and bandits..." 


The prophets shall prove that the impostor was Messiah (Greek: "Christ") and therefore, ruler of planet Earth...! I see, the evidence for Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") to be Messiah (Greek: Christos) are thieves and bandits.  Do not make me laugh about this "honesty", "humbleness" and "truthfulness"!  Whoever refers to thieves and bandits for the person and mission of his own, only can be a thief and bandit, himself.  I expressively reject that the Jewish prophets are to call as such but I say that that Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera here perpetrates a psychological projection, i.e. he dishes depravity and criminality of his own on others (his competitors, rivals and enemies).  This blather does not differ from the foul mouth and foul play Christian Mafia later slanders, denounces and tortures the heretics. His henchmen only emulate Joh 10:8 when burning the heretics at the stakes wile being alive. As far the Christians are not able to perpetrate such atrocities today, it is not the merit of Christian Mafia. The threat stays as this organized crime continues to exist!

Christian hypocrites and foul mouths do not make me laugh when complaining about the manner of derision and contempt we refute and debunk planet Earth's most organized crime! As long as you are impertinent and perfidious enough as to call the prophets of the Bible (Christians' cant: Old Testament) to be thieves and bandits everybody has the right to measure you according to your own scripture as dregs of humankind or Mafiosi, respectively, Mafia... As long as you are that  perfidious as to palm that impertinence off as "god's word" even according to the Christians' fake of "god's word"  (see: Mt 7:2, Mr 4:24, Lu: 6:38) I have to right to call your faking "god" to be : Lord Muck n' Schmuck, puking mud n' mire, all the felons and Mafiosi admire!

Christian hypocrites, do not make me laugh about your complaints of perfidy!  You get the style you and your topmost shyster deserve (see: Mt 7:2, Mr 4:24, Lu: 6:38) and that is due to such an organized crime I am debunking, here! Another manner as applied here means insufficient perception about this sect as planet Earth's most organized crime that innumerably is to find elsewhere but not among genuine philosophers.


In the third century, humankind’s greatest philosopher Plotinus charged his pupil and follower Porphyry (232/3 - 304 C.E.) to debunk the uprising outrage of Christian sect. Ancient Greek philosopher Porphyry -- then living in Rome -- was keen-minded enough as to recognize that one first has to debunk the faked authorization by which those Christian shysters want to accomplish their will to power and to enslave humankind as shammed “order of god”. This "law of authorization" -- a German emulated in the 20th century -- is feigned by concoctions palmed off as "god's word" on the "sheep", prey or victims by the Christian predators (shysters) by which they want to pretend to keep the "keys of heaven" (Mt 16:18) and the "authority to bind and to loose on Earth" what at the same time is "bound and loosed in heaven" (Mt 16:19). Concerning everything else, the shysters have efficient machines for whitewashing! That means, Porphyry correctly realized that one first has to debunk that what Christian shysters palm off as “god’s word” on their victims as shammed "authorization" giving their will to power a fling, i.e. to abase their fellow human beings as sheep (animals) and exalt themselves as shepherds (slave holders). The latter even are another species compared to sheep! As well, Christian felon and Emperor Constantine as not less felonious Christian Emperor Theodosius II took the view that the only way to “refute” Porphyry’s revelation of Christians’ fake of “god’s word” is to burn it.

Christians' faked "law of authorization" to conquer the world (see: 1Joh 5:4) and exalt themselves as "shepherds" while abasing their congeners to be animals (sheep) is the allegation that already in the beginning of the universe god is is that upset about the sins of human beings that were not created, yet as to make up his mind to create a peer (Christians' cant: "son of god") that vicariously has to suffer for sins of human beings. Although this one has suffered, god's vindictiveness still it not quenched. Only those, who believe in somebody feigning to be his peer nevertheless has to become tortured in hell, in a most cruel way beyond description and forever!
In 448, Christian shysters, hoodlums and desperadoes burnt this book of Porphyry against Christian abomination. It was the start of Christian book burning, at all.   Until the end of the 19th century, Catholic sect forbade to keep and read the Bible to its enslaved sheep, in particular, in non-Latin versions. Finally yet importantly, this prohibition was due to the strident revelation of philosopher Porphyry.  Catholic foul mouths and foul players knew that they could not thrive while the philosophers have free speech, viz, the right to inform about their abomination of deceits.  Today, we only know parts of Porphyry’s scripture by quotations of Christian monkey-philosophers.  Now, instead of the return of the great impostor, braggart and shyster (Jesus) and resurrection of the dead, by the ash of Christians’ burning revelations as that one of Porphyry resurrect.  Therefore Christians, do not worry: At least, there is one resurrection and more over doomsday on Christian sect and Christians is approaching! The author of this exposition also reveres Plotinus, however, as philosopher first of all he is not obliged to any colleague but to the truths. Anyway, philosophers do not share views because they like or dislike one another but only in as much they deem them to contain truths.

To begin with, some words about the way we are going to debunk Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") and Christendo(om). This manner might be unusual even for more or less conditioned Christians but is in the line of similar renowned critics of this sect like, for instance, ancient Greek philosopher Celsus (about the year 178 C.E.) and German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900).  Nietzsche writes:

 “The critic of Christianity cannot evade necessity of making Christianity contemptible.”[ii]

The manner of an exposition derives from its subject. Christianity has no honesty, sincerity or probity. Quite the contrary is the truth. The claim that Christian sect's hideousness, foul mouth and foul play (criminality) purportedly is a corruption of "good tenets" of Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christian") is an act of perfidy by which the Christians are used to whitewashing and saving their will to power due to their depraved as criminal traits. This perfidy excellently works if it is fobbed off on goofs n' fools. However, if not applied to those imbecile, weak-minded , viz, biological robots, one only can laugh one’s head off about this cracked joke. Hardly, a Christian can outdo Yehoshua-ben-Pandera concerning unscrupulousness. He is homo scelestus - the criminal human, with which also belongs to the crime exalting oneself as "god"... "God" shall make his and his Christians' crimes unassailable and hereby perfect. Regarding perfidy (foul mouth), no being on two or four legs can outdo him, at least not on planet Earth...Here, we are going to produce evidence that

·        firstly, that those prevarications (“excuses”)  are intrinsic to  perfidy und

·      secondly, our manner is harmless compared to the Christians’ denunciations and crimes on their adversaries and enemies, e.g. heretics, Mithraicism, Manichaeism etc. This means that the Christian now get an idea of the judgment they give on others (“the measure you give will be the measure you get” , Mr 4:24, see also: Lu 6:38).

·        Thirdly,  those prevarications shall serve the perfidious  keeping their masks and Trojan Horse to trap their prey and

·        fourthly, shall make Christian foul mouth and foul play unassailable, i.e. they serve the (almost) perfect crime.

Hereby, the Christians can keep their foul mouth and foul play. On the contrary, the "excuses" shall help the sect's bosses to  repeat all those crimes, outrages,  warfare, barbarities and atrocities etc.  whenever they deem them to be expedient for their will to power. By strong terms I use here, I do not intent to insult somebody or simply to repeat something. Hereby, we want to recall what depraved, contemptible and abominable  those objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy (Christians) are. Whoever plays down this objectification of perfidy (Christian sect) becomes accomplice of it! One can also put it that way: Whoever demands a different style on Christendo(o)m as Celsus, Friedrich Nietzsche and  the author of this exposition apply to this objectification of perfidy, never grasped the first things of it, unless he proper is a Christian objectification of perfidy.  Many people told the author that reading his scripture is very thrilling and fascinating. The author does not mind but want it. However, to him it appears to be necessary to remind the readers of the abomination of the subject, at any time. 

Let’s think about it: If  Satan or any comparable monster would set up a sect and hereby succeed in getting worshiped as „god“ would he ever say: Oh yes, I am Satan, join me, kneel down to me and worship me as „god“?  

·         Would not he rather pass himself off as  "benefactor", "savior", "Christ" and even "god" and would not he disguise  his perfidy, insidiousness, foul mouth and foul play by its moral contrary, for instance, as “good” and even “love”?  Would not he think: “But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me“ (Lu 19:27)  and would not he put on the mask smarming: “Love your enemies“ (Mt 5: 44)…?

·         Would he ever do something else but Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, whom the Christians call Jesus “Christ”, did?

·         Would not result the Planet’s most organized crime from his (Satan’s) sect like the Christian one is?

·         Would not   Satan, respectively, Satan’s sect a)  at best contest all their innumerable crimes, b) try to „apologizing“ them by numberless „excuses“ and – if at all – admit the tip of the iceberg of their barbarities millennia ago, i.e., if the loot is not endangered by such fault “admissions”? 

·         Would Satan’s sect, respectively, the organized very evil behave else than Christian sect does?  

Those questions do not only answer themselves but also each basic inquiry on Jesus „Christ“ and Christian sect. Satan and his sect would appear in the disguise of „love“ and „suffering for others“ as Jesus „Christ“ and Christian sect do. By such tricks Satan, Jesus “Christ” and Christians can be foul players, felons, murderers, mass-murderers etc. just to present a sham-legitimacy for enslaving their fellow human beings while being regarded as „reverends“, „saints“, „holy fathers“ and other types of „moral whoppers“ etc. by their victims.   Only that way Christian sect became that what it is today! A more evil than that one of (bestiality of) Christianity is unthinkable. Nobody can outdo Satan’s, Jesus „Christ’s“ and the Christians’ camouflage of their foul mouth, foul play, perfidy, infamy and insidiousness (Christian jargon: „the sick  needing a physician“ – see: Lu 5:31).

Jesus „Christ“ is Satan’s, respectively, the evilness’ disguise.  (Criminality of) Christianity is Satan’s sect and Satan’s camouflage or philosophically spoken: the objectification (epitomization) of perfidy (evil) in the world that always deceives to be the  moral contrary of it.  There are no enigmas in this sect but the logic of evil with all its disguises of lies, deceits, foul mouth, foul play, foul “love” and foul “morals”… Christian sect means the love a felons’ “god” and his felons’ “morals”…!  It is “honor” among thieves and foul players!


Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) gives his victims a “friendly” pat on the shoulder while warning them of wolves in a sheep’s clothing. The victims shall think that the one that warns them that "friendly" never could be one of those ravenous predators …

Ancient Greeks predicted that after their era Hades (Satan) and his brother would conquer one third of the world. Hereby, they obviously predicted Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: "Jesus Christ“), his brother James and Christianity! Pertaining to Christianity, reason and faith consent. The Jews´ Bible that allegedly proves all the claims of "Jesus Christ" and the Christians, e.g., being Messiah (English: Anointed One, Greek: Christos) or even „god’s son“ etc. debunks and identifies to us: „... he who hanged is accursed of god’ (De 21:23). Christian chief ideologist Saul Paul knows what these words -- even the Christians feign to believe as „god's" word - mean: " ... for it is written, »Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree«" (Ga 3:13), (Latin Vulgate writes: "qui pendet in ligno" - that means hanging on something made of wood). So, write this above or below each Christian cross. The cross is the mark of Cain of the accursed  by god! Only casehardened felons past description presume to fob an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) as “god” off on the victims of their deception. De 21:23 certainly is the reason why Catholic sect partially by death penalty prohibited to keep and read the bible for its victims (brainwashed Catholic slaves) from the year 325 until 1869.  

This proves that Christians from the very outset were aware that they palm Satan, Satan's Christ or a similar felonious monstrosity off as "god" on the victims of their deceits, indeed for their selfish and deceitful crime of exalting themselves as slaveholders of humankind. The problem with god, truths and ethics (Christians’ cant: “love”) is “settled” by making a “god” of one’s own (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera). Now, Christian foul mouths, foul players and felons (Christians’ cant: “foul mouths) have found their “just god” (Martin Luther). In addition, by lifting an accomplice of theirs to "god", those (abominable Christian) objectifications of perfidy fabricate spurious "evidence" for making themselves as "vicars of god" on earth, viz, as slaveholders of humankind. Allegedly "authorized" by that "god" made by their own they now have accomplished the (almost) perfect crime and can commit those crimes, especially on human rights resulting from their will to power etc. Exalting oneself that way means abasing others to animals like, for instance, sheep ... That is how this bestiality (of Christianity) honors the dignity of human beings ... This stays true, even if the Christians "avoid knowing what is true" (German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, 1844 -1900). Jesus “Christ” are the “tenets” of the (almost) perfect crime, i.e. how to perpetrate foul mouth and foul play to the utmost while being reputed as “upholders of moral standards”, “reverends”, “saints” and “holy fathers” etc. This is a business in exchange: The initiator becomes addressed and worshiped as “god” and the other fake his “deputies” in chief on Earth, viz, can give their will to power a fling!
"Jesus Christ" instead of being „god’s son", he is an anathema to god like Satan is one to god! Christians worshiping this ugly and deformed miscarriages of nature as their sect's "god" because they are equally accursed of god and more or less the same slobs n' flops of nature he is. Moreover, comparable to the Jesus freak they evenly want to take revenge on those who turned out better by nature, in their views!  

Jesus said, "The kingdom of the father is like a certain man who wanted to kill a powerful man. In his own house he drew his sword and stuck it into the wall in order to find out whether his hand could carry through. Then he slew the powerful man. [iii]


This is precisely what German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) said about hundred years ago without knowing this "Gospel of Thomas": Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ and his mon(k)ey-Christians are the revenge of those who turned out badly by nature on those who turned out better, in their views. (At Nietzsche’s time, Christian still succeeded in keeping this gospel as allegedly "lost" ...!). It is about revenge even by killing what Christian schmucks n’ mugs full of muck camouflage by the sheep's clothing of "love"! Here, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) declares to want the same, he and Christians otherwise are used to accusing Satan to intend.
The powerful man is the one to whom those miscarriages of nature cannot hold a candle. Perfidiously, those desperadoes and that scum of the earth want to kill him. (The "heaven" of revenge this spiteful little devil and his Christian fellows call: “kingdom of the father”). The more Christians know what depraved, perfidious and criminal their mind and intentions are, the more fanatically they claim to be known by their sheep’s clothing (“love”, “truth”, “revelation”, “charity”, “martyrdom” etc.) and not by their true grimace (perfidious foul players, felons, barbarians).
In history, Christianity precisely turned out as such a Satan’s sect, viz, of infamous crimes, murders, outrages, barbarities and other sorts of abominations, provided one judges this most organized crime on earth by its fruits and not by its sheep's clothing.
The Bible debunks and condemns Christianity and the Christians not less than reason does. Hitler’s “My fight’ and the Christian "New Testament" have one in common: Each abomination is announced. One just has to read the writings, in particular, those scriptures the Christians wanted to destroy forever, in vain!
At first sight, there are apparently insurmountable contradictions pertaining to to Christian sect. For instance, Mt 5:44 orders to “love” one’s enemies, Lu 19:27 demands to slaughter everybody, who does not want Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus “Christ”) "humbly" and "modestly" reigning over him. Violating god’s Ten Commandments, mon(k)ey-Christ even instigates to hatred on one’s father, mother, children, brothers and sisters.
Lu 14:26 RSV
26 "If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.
In contradiction to that, 1Jo 3:15 names somebody hating his brothers and sisters a murderer that does not have eternal life (see: ibid.). Hereby inadvertently and indirectly, it is proven even according to Christians’ own "god's word" Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ is a murderer having no eternal life. He does no only hate his brothers and sisters; he even inveigles others into doing so. Taking into account, on the one hand:

· that this monster (Jesus "Christ") even arouses hatred on one’s father, mother and even on the children of one’s own that mostly helplessly depend on the parents, but on the other hand
· flatters his accomplices to „love“ their enemies,
this "contradiction" still becomes more grotesque.

The key to the „mystery“: It is about the logic of perfidy (underhandedness). Corresponding the latter, the wolf or brute juggles with its true face (of hatred, vindictiveness, foul play), on the one hand, and with its sheep’s clothing (of "love", "truths", "god", etc.), on the other. The wolf or better: beast is the true face of Jesus „Christ“ and the Christians and their sheep’s clothing are pretty terms as already mentioned or others like, for instance, "love" „morals“, „justice“, „martyrdom“, "charity", „holiness“, „modesty“, „humbleness“ etc.

There are only "contradictions" for goofs and fools,
Stooping to mon(k)ey-Christ's and his Christians' spoofs.

By those concepts, Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ and all his mon(k)ey-Christians, firstly camouflage their mug or grimace of the wolf or brute, on the one hand. On the other hand, in that way disguised, Jesus “Christ” and the “Christians” perpetrate their foul play, especially their venom, outrages, crimes, atrocities and other sorts of abomination, unassailably. Hereby, they succeed in committing the (almost) perfect crime! The perfect crime is an unassailable crime. Why is the Christians’ foul play unassailable? The answer: First, the crimes are not recognizable, since they are disguised (in a sheep’s clothing) by its moral reverse, e.g., crimes faked as “boons”, “benefactions” etc.

That what is not recognized cannot be fought. Here, the liar and deceiver avoids facing his enemy, i.e., the truth by feigning to be the “truth”. Secondly, here the (Christian) foul players pilfer the tools (weapons), by which their foul play could be opposed, fought and destroyed, already in advance. I.e., before those bastards n’ dastards start playing foully they camouflage their foul play as “love”, “charity”, “spiritual welfare” etc. By what one can oppose foul play, murder and barbarities? The answer: by justice, fair play, honesty, decency etc! The organized crime of perfidy (Christian sect) already has stolen those weapons in advance that can defeat them. All those pilfered plumes Christian foul mouths and foul players wear in their sheep’s clothing.

 Mr 3:27 RSV

27  But no one can enter a strong man’s house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man; then indeed he may plunder his house.

Before the perfidious Christians start their foul play (abomination), they already made their victims defenseless. Even the strongest man can become defeated by weak and coward dastards or slobs’ n’ flops, if he  -- the fair player  -- trustingly laid down his weapons while the perfidious foul players stealthily  arm themselves. The goal of these slobs n’ flops and miscarriages of nature and morals (love) is to get the social ranks of those to whom they cannot hold a candle, viz, making the last   to be reputed the “first " and vice versa (what Satan is said having done by rebelling on god, according to the Christians’ own doctrines).


 That is why everybody is to know by his fruits (see: Mt 7:16) but Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus “Christ”) and his fellow Christian foul players by their sheep’s clothing.

·        So, being “salt of the earth” (Mt 5:13) or “light of the word” (Mt 5:14) is their sheep’s clothing, whereas “the sick needing a physician” (Lu 5:31) the true nature and indeed, how mon(k)ey-Christ despises those worshiping him as “god” … Or:

·        Mt 5:44 („love“ your enemies) is their sheep’s clothing whereas Lu 14:26 (slaughter all enemies) is the brute’s or (Christian) foul players’ true grimace.  


Whoever honestly could contest that mon(k)ey-Christ and all his mon(k)ey-Christians are the sick needing a physician (see: Lu 5:31)?
The excellent sheep’s clothing shall gull “the strong man” (Gospel of Thomas, Logion 98) into laying down the weapons and become defenseless. He (the enemy) shall think: Why should I be afraid of those miserable dastards, flops and damp squibs of nature that always make sure that they “love” their enemies …?
The more wretched and depraved subhuman creatures, the more pompous their sheep’s clothing! The more they are aware being subhuman creatures, the more the hell of a fuss they pretend to be „god“, „god’ son“, „Messiah“, „god’ vicar on earth“, “shepherds above sheep” …
One would not believe it possible what bastards n’ dastards, „the sick needing a physician“ (Lu 5:31), slobs n’ flops and other sorts of miscarriages of nature fancy being …
While instigating to hate almost everybody and everything, even oneself (see: Lu 14:26) Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Jesus „Christ“) and the Christians destroy equity and good faith as essential foundation of human’s social existence and replace it by perfidy and foul play. From perfidy necessarily results foul play, from equity and good faith follows fair play. The sheep’s clothing is what constitutes Christian perfidy (colloquial: underhandedness). Jesus’ and the Christians’ sheep’s clothing shall lead human beings up the garden path regarding their depravity and their intent of foul play.
While establishing perfidy (colloquial: underhandedness) instead of equity and good faith as foundation of living together mon(k)ey-Christ and his fellow mon(k)ey-Christians morally try pressing their fellow human beings even below most mammals and marsupials. The latter also love their offspring, Christian foul players are conditioned to hate. Without love to one's offspring almost each life emerging above plants would perish and humankind, anyway. This is what Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") wants:
"Jesus said, »I shall destroy this house, and no one will be able to (re)build it [...]«"[iv]
Who wonders that these bastards n’ dastards (Christians) did not only want to get rid of the scriptures of their opponents but also the most of their own. Finally, one only can cant and tamper with a few writings, if at all - as we point out in the preliminaries. "House" stands for the world and humankind. That is what Satan's Christ or Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ wants, everything else is the sheep's clothing! Again, the more perfidy of those “doctrines” is obvious, the more fanatically Jesus “Christ” and the Christians feign and allege this meanness and wretchedness by its moral reverse (“sheep’s clothing”), for instance, as “love”, "truth", "god's word", "martyrdom" and other terms being in high esteem. Of course, most people are ready and determined to obstruct crimes of hatred and vengeance, however not crimes of “love” … "Now, all the more", "precisely because" etc. are the well-know slogans of desperadoes, in particular, those of the Christians! Liars living lies never give in, whatever price, they have to pay. Felons of the breed of Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus „Christ“) never will give up their intent of foul play to take revenge for their supposed or real disadvantages by nature on those who turn out better. „Now, all the more“ or „precisely because“ is what desperadoes say if they do not succeed to take revenge.

Thus, they do not give up their foul play, criminal intent and their hatred. Instead of giving up them, they start hatching how they successfully can perpetrate their foul play, respectively, realize (accomplish) their criminal intent. Therefore, they finally make up their mind faking to stand for that what they indeed are determined to destroy and kill and feigning to fight and destroy that for what they secretly stand. Correspondingly blackguards, swindlers, crooks, rogues, objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy , in brief: objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy or "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) appear as “reverends”, “saints”, “holy father”, “vicar of god” etc. and so all their crimes of hatred and vengeance become passed as “boons“,“ spiritual welfare”, “benefactions” etc.).

Never, never and never desperadoes will give up their depravity and vengeance -- and Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy , all the less (see: Joh 8:34. Even each Christian always can blame his fellow Christian. He only needs to face him with his sheep’s clothing. The latter is the way in which Christian sects fight one another.

Since those schmucks, nuts n’ mugs full of muck, pushovers, wimps, maggots n’ faggots, creeps n’ crook or slobs n’ flops lose if there is fair play, they decide to become perfidious, insidious and depraved, in one word: evil or perfidy, insidiousness, depravity, respectively, evilness of their mind turn(s) out. This group of depravity (“the sick needing a physician”, Lu 5:31) Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (nick name: Jesus “Christ”) is targeting. Hence, objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy are used to camouflaging their intents of foul play in a sheep’s clothing and thus make their depravity, spite, infamy, crimes, outrages, atrocities and barbarities unassailable!

The “products” of those hatching and plotting (how desperadoes can succeed by perfidy) are: “god’s son”, “god’s chosen ones”, “mystery of belief”, “Jesus Christ”, “vicarious suffering”, “execution on the cross”, “sheep”, “good shepherd”, “vicar of god on earth”, "holy father", “authority to bind and to loose on earth what simultaneously is bound and loosed in heaven”, with one word: Christianity ...

Whoever says that there never was such an attempt to grift by perfidy what the concerned failed to get by fair play? Christians? Whoever says that this attempt was not successful? Christians? One cannot imagine what on Earth Christians tell (to the Marines) … It belongs to the nature of perfidy not being open-minded but to hide itself behind a sheep’s clothing. It is to doubt that John Bull and Brother Jonathan are smart enough as to see which way the wind blows, here. History of humankind tells us that there hardly is an abomination that was not perpetrated. Moreover, nobody contributed more to the latter but this organized crime (Christianity)!

 If Christians or any other objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy would be honest, they already would have lost. Deception only succeeds, if the deceivers do not notice that they are going to be deceived. The more the victims notice that they are going to be deceived, the less deceivers are successful. That why perfidy is the soul of each deceit. The more they know accomplishing perfidy, the more Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ conditions his accomplices (Christian schmucks n' mugs) demonstrate their sheep’s clothing.

Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus “Christ”) does not bring human beings to god but to an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) making those misguided ones also to be the accursed of god. Perfidy of Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) is already betrayed by ordering to „love“ one’s enemies. What one loves is not one’s enemy. Unlike honor or respect, love is no act of reason but a feeling. That is why the Ten Commandments proclaimed by Prophet Moses correctly and honestly do not oblige to love one’s parents but to honor them. One only can have feelings or one only can feign them! Only a mental wreck, a poor wretch or spiteful little devil dominated by his grudge, envy, hatred and vindictiveness, who does not have any feelings and to whom hypocrisy, underhandedness and  mendacity already has become its, respectively, his  first nature can order feelings like, for instance, love.  


Perfidy also is the logic of evil. Feigning notions by its moral reverse, we call semantic simulations. The latter are an essential part of perfidy and are pointed out in chapter 2. So, we speak about semantic simulations if mendacity is called „truthfulness“, hatred „love“, enslaving „humbleness“, crimes „martyrdom“, selfishness „brotherly love“, lies „truths“ etc. Consequently, lying by concepts (semantic simulation) becomes essential part of Jesus' and the Christians' deceits. The terms of the sheep’s clothing hereby become “Trojan Horses” that shall misguide the unsuspecting victims to the snares those the perfidious have set for them, insidiously.
False, misleading as insulting comparisons, psychological projections (also pointed out in chapter: 2), and provocation crimes (argued in chapter: 3) are further elements of Christian perfidy (of what their sheep’s clothing is made).

Besides semantic simulations (colloquial: juggling with names) psychological projections are another essential part of Christian perfidy. Especially in chapter 2.6, we point out those kinds of projections. By psychological projection, the projecting one tries pushing the truths about himself that smashes him over to someone else, preferably to his rivals and enemies. That is why the Jews, in particular, the Pharisees are libeled to be haughty and supercilious. However, haughty is not the one that fakes to be „god“ or not those „the sick needing a physician“ (Lu 5:31) pretending to be „salt of the earth“ (Mt 5:13) or even „light of the world“ (Mt 5:14). The others (e.g. Jews, Pharisees etc.) purportedly want to murder but not the one that instigates to slaughter all his enemies (see: Lu 19:27) …! Psychological projections, viz, blaming others for the flaws and foul play of one’s own, does not only serve to camouflage oneself in a sheep’s clothing. It also servers the purpose of making one's perfidy and foul play, in particular, crimes, unassailable. The perfect crime is an unassailable crime. Faking always the reverse of that what is true means that the perfidious cannot be attacked for their perfidy and foul play, since the perfidious always are used to lying that the deplorable facts did not exist. Consequently, one cannot improve anything because the perfidious deny the existence of that what is to improve. Therefore, Christianity is not to improve. It is only a case for the attorney. That is why the most abominable felons of our planet (Christians) always and already in advance sham to be “martyrs” … More over, accusing others of the flaws and foul play of one’s own even could be „understood“ as veiling of oneself by the contrary.

Perfidy, viz, camouflaging perfidy and foul play of one’s own by its moral reverse nowhere is that brought to the boil but by Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ. He does not only use psychological projections, insidiously. He also is depraved enough as to accuse others (his enemies) perpetrating that foul play (of psychological projections), hardly somebody is able to perpetrate more than he does. Jesus "Christ" is the incarnated perfidy, i.e., that has become a human body. Projections of his are, for instance, „the wolf in a sheep’s clothing”, "Satan", “the Pharisees”, "the evil world", "the Jews", "the keys of heaven" (potestas ligandi et solvendi), “the speck in others’ eyes but repressing the log of one’s own”, “who is without sin among you, that throw the first stone” etc.
Psychological projections necessarily do not mean that the victims are completely innocent but that the depravity or wickedness and foul play they are accused first and in any case are to apply to the blaming one. By words the accusing one talks about the other, however in fact the accusing one only debunks himself. That what is to apply to the blamed one, still is to find out. In addition, psychological projections further unveil that it is about a  person believing in the lies and deceit of his own, since the projecting perpetrator hates the truth about himself (see:  Lu 14:26 and Joh 16:12).

Those phenomena like, for instance, semantic simulations, false comparisons, Trojan horses, psychological projections and provocation crimes are “tools” for repressing the truths, viz, mechanism for deceit and self-deception. Here, the borderline between awareness and unawareness is fluent and can differ from one moment to another one, even regarding the same person. When deception turns into self-deception, the liar starts believing in the lies of his own. This neither excuses the liar nor makes the lie less harmful.

  •  No lies do more harm to public than those ones in which the liars even believe!

·         No lies are more criminal than those ones serving the purpose for self-deception!

Not by accident, Christian sect became our planet’s most organized crime, especially the most organized crime of murder. A liar, who is able to differ from reality from his lies, in comparison to liars believing in their lies is a molehill, whereas the liars believing in their lies are mountains. To repeat it unmistakably: Most dangerous lies to the public are those in which the liars believe (from the bottom of their depravity).

Provocation crimes are pointed out in the third chapter. They are the peak of perfidy! Here, foul play, in particular, crimes is, respectively are perpetrated with the intent to give the blame for them to the hated enemy. For instance, when Catholic and Protestants waged war on each other from 1618 – 1648 in Europe for thirty years, it was not unusual that the one (Christian) enemy destroyed churches of his own just in order to give the blame for that to the other (hated Christian) enemy. For instance, „the innocent lamb of god suffering for the sins of the world“ goes to the Jerusalem Temple and demonstrably batters people being there. However, who is to blame corresponding Christian brain washing? The perpetrator of those he grievous bodily harmed? No, the battered , are the victims! The perpetrator poses as "martyr" (“innocent felon, pardon, lamb of god”) and the victims as "perpetrators". That is Christian perfidy! The perfidious criminal in a sheep's clothing seriously asks: "Which of you convicts me of sin?" (Joh 8:46) Very typical of perfidy! Very typical of Christian! Even in Christianly enslaved countries of today, everybody emulating this would be jailed for several years. Whoever does not believe so should go to the Vatican and do that what Jesus monkey-Christ did, perhaps batter the pope possibly because of the Christian atrocities, he in person enumerated in March 2000 ... Let us wait and see what will follow …!

One cannot emphasize enough: The almost perfect crime is achieved, if even perpetration of the most atrocities and abomination cannot harm but even promote the „moral“ reputation of its perpetrator(s). Each truthful one can judge that Christian denomination of abomination has achieved this level of perfecting crime.

Christian sect already and sufficiently is convicted to be an organized (religious) crime because it matches the own criteria it gives about Satan, i.e., of evilness. The same is to say to its criminal instigator, death penalty convict and accursed one of god (see: De 21:23).

Pertaining to that topic, we want to summarize

  • The instigator of this crime refers to the bible of Judaism for (spurious) evidence, e.g., pertaining to his claims to be “god”, “god’s son”, “Messiah” (English: Anointed One, Greek: Christos) etc. However, this bible only proves that he is an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23). Consequently, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus „Christ“) matches the features, he and his Christians otherwise pass off as ones of Satan. Whoever is accursed of god (see: De 21:23) is no darling of god or son of god but only a poor old sod, flop and miscarriage of nature!


  • According to Christian doctrines Satan rebelled on god because he did not consent with god who was first and who was last one. Satan wants to reverse the ranks of the first and the last one. Anyway, this is not only the aim of Jesus monkey-God and Christian denomination (of abomination). This is also what he and his Christian henchmen palm as utmost “morals”, peak of “love”, “brotherly love” and “charity” etc. off on the victims of their deceits …!


  • Because of his insurrection, god fist took away all the beauty from Satan, he was keeping as former angel, according to Christian doctrines. That means that even according to Christian doctrines pertaining to supernatural beings – not natural ones! - beauty is a mark of divinity and ugliness one of Satan. According to contemporary reports, Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ is ugly, little and misshapen as Satan or sin. Thus, the outward appearance of freak Jesus “Christ” is one of the most kept secrets (“mysteries”) in Christian sect. Why did god take away all the beauty from Satan? The answer: So that individuals should be warned of him, already by his appearance! In this manner, god made it corresponding Satan's Christ the Christians call "Jesus Christ" ... The deformity of Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ is revealed in chapter: 4.


  • From Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ, there are reported crimes of bodily harm when the Jesus terrorists raided the Jerusalem Temple. Three of four “official” gospels conceal these crimes of the Jesus-terrorist but John reports them. However, even John withholds if they resulted in death. Of 72 chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") (current score of numeration!), only four shall be authentic. Hereby, Christian organized crimes inadvertently and indirectly concedes that lies and deceits are the rule for it and truths are the exception, if at all. The “apocryphe” “Gospel of Barnabas” Islamic theologians deem to be the only true and original gospel speaks about thousand people that were beaten to death when the Jesus terrorist raided the Jerusalem Temple. The chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") imputed to Peter that originally belonged with Christian “New Testament” (Canon Muratori) reports that the Jesus terrorists were wanted for arson on the Jerusalem Temple (pointed out in chapter 3). Presumably, because it debunks Christian sheep’s clothing that much, the chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") of Peter was declared "non-authentic", later. However, apart from this fact, the other chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") more or less copy from the chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") imputed to Peter pertaining to Satan’s “Christ” stunt of execution on the gallows or cross. "Authentic" is that what Early Christians liked and "non-authentic" that what they disliked (This is pointed out in the preliminaries). Even about 2000 years later, one can convict Christian terrorist and desperado Simon Peter of at least four murders (pointed out in chapter 4). Moreover, most of their chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") and early scriptures the Christians wanted to destroy forever. However, at least a large scale of them were found again in a cave near the cemetery of Nag Hammadi in Egypt in 1945 – in the year of the end of the holocaust. Some of them clue that the instigator to arson or firebug (see: Lu 12:49) Jesus monkey-Christ in person ordered the arson of Rome in the year 64. That is humankind's most act of terror that ever took place, never outdone and never to outdo! Shifting the blame for that to Emperor Nero is the nature of provocation crimes – very, very typical of Christian organized crime faking a religion! Unlike Jesus Christ, Emperor Nero neither instigated to arson (see: Lu 12:49) nor was wanted for having committed arson (see: "The Gospel of Peter") …! Again , Jesus monkey-Christ matches his and his sect’s features of Satan, viz, he is Satan, i.e. he is that what he imagines Satan to be…!


  •  Jesus monkey-God wants to destroy humankind and the world as Christians blame Satan to do. For more details see: chapter 2.


  • Satan, Jesus “Christ” and Adolph Hitler believe in the triumph of will that everything is just a matter of believe. Everything should be possible to the believer (see: Mt 17:20). Therefore, if you fancy being “god” then you are no god not because you are no god but because you do not believe enough to be “god”. Consequently, if the brute is no "god" as it shams by its sheep’s clothing, then it is no god only because one does not believe enough.  Consequently, everybody, who does not believe so -- like the Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy (i.e. "the sick needing a physician" Lu 5:31) want him to do so -- is to eliminate.  That is logic and ideology of megalomania and bestiality! One can also put it the other way: If you are a liar, deceiver, criminal, desperado, felon and terrorist, you are none (of those) only  because you do not believe  to be it, completely independent from the facts and truths  that you are a liar, deceiver, criminal, desperado, felon and terrorist etc. That is why abomination of Christianity is used to solving such problems by the “holy spirit”, viz, by Jesus monkey-God’s and its own perfidy and foul play (spite, denouncing, slandering, murder and even mass-murder) but not by reason and fair play! Whoever does not understand the mind of the “triumph of will”, that one  is not able to understand objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy like Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ, the Christians, Adolph Hitler and the Nazis and all their atrocities.   That is the key to the delusion of grandeur of the latter and all their barbarities that in addition only needs another condition: that triumph of will is matched by corresponding (Satanic) unscrupulousness. This is expounded in chapter 6.


  • Satan puts perfidy (and corresponding foul play) instead of equity and good faith as foundation of human’s social existence. That is precisely what Jesus monkey-Christ and his Christian sect is about. (This is pointed out in chapter 2).


  • Mon(k)ey-Christ’s introduction of Eucharist stems from his commitment to cannibalism (pointed out in chapter 7). Paul even reports cannibalism among Early Christians. Ugh ...!


  • The top impostor's alleged encounter with Satan in the desert is a psychological projection, in which his bad conscience reproaches to him being a spiteful little monster like Satan (pointed out in chapter 1). One can call equity and good faith to be moral and good and perfidy as its contrary the evil. When Satan is called the enforcer of evil, then objectification (epitomization) of perfidy is meant. That is exactly what Jesus “Christ” and abominations of Christian sect want. Consequently, Christianity corresponds to that what itself calls evil, Satan or Satanic. Jesus Monkey "Christ" and Christian denomination precisely present that what they pretend to fight, and they fight that what they sham to accomplish. That is nothing new. That is the nature of deceit (pointed out in the preliminaries). Jesus “Christ” is similar to that what even the Christians call Satan. Christianity is that what it calls to be Satanic. That is perfidy! That is Christendo(o)m!


  • Satan or evil is the same. Satan is only an anthropomorphic way of thinking. Because the principle of evil and/or of Satan is to replace equity, good faith  and fair play by perfidy and foul play, one can call  Christianity an objectification (epitomization) of the evil and/or Satan in the world. (This means how perfidy (evilness) becomes human bodies).!


That is Christianity, all over!

Due to their perfidy, Christians call their felons “martyrs” and the martyrs of their crimes, outrages and abomination. There are only limited human rights for criminals and organized crimes. Christianity is a hindrance to everything it claims by its sheep’s clothing: “morals”, “truths”, “wisdom”, "love", “religion”, “god” and the matters resulting from that. Due to Christians' perfidy – in its very principle and from the very outset – Christendo(o)m is the most hindrance to religion,  god, ethics, morals, love and the truths because it perfidiously claims those things and consequently allows nobody to seek and research for that. Feigning to stand for those matters is due to an almost perfect attempt to repress them, once forever!


Lu 12:49 NRSV

49 "I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled!


 This is hidden by a sheep's clothing or Trojan Horse full of pretty terms that are in high esteem in the views of victims e.g., "love", "brotherly love" "charity", "truths", "god", "god's son", "god's word", "humbleness",  "martyrdom" etc. Those concepts serve as  traps, pits and Trojan Horses. Regarding this sect of abomination, perfidy and success correspond and are linked each other.


  • Christianity means to give one's  depraved and even felonious mind a fling because one is able to palm oneself off  as "saint" on others, indeed by artificial "morals", artificial "love, artificial "truths" and an artificial "god" etc. that are   canted and/ or tampered with the depraved and felonious mind of one's own. Hereby foul play, crimes and abomination of one's own become unleashed and unassailable.
  • Christianity means the (almost) perfect and unassailable crime but being regarded as religion worshiping "god“...



 In chapter 7 we point out the context of Christian Eucharist and cannibalism but there we also demonstrate by the example of Aurelius Augustinus ("St. Augustine") that there is no moral change when converting to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (nick name: Jesus “Christ”). There, we prove that all the abominable traits -- Augustine tells about himself before having converted to Jesus -- are precisely those ones marking the Christians. Thus, when converting to Jesus (as “born” or "reborn" Christian) nothing has changed but the conceitedness about oneself. Now liars, slobs n' flops, schmucks and thugs, bastards n' dastards or rogues and crooks, villains and felons, etc. fool themselves to be upholder of "moral standards".  The allegedly now new “born” or “reborn” Christians fake


·        their lies as “truths” and/or “mystery of faith”, 

·        their perfidy as “truthfulness”,

·        their hate as “love”,

·        their perfidy  as “honesty”,

·        their insidiousness as “uprightness”,

·        their deceits  as “love to the truths”,

·        self-deception as “commitment to the truths” or even  “martyrdom for the truths”,

·        their foul play as “spiritual welfare”,

·        enslaving of humankind as “humbleness”,

·        their crimes “love to the enemy”, “boons”,

·        their outrages as “obedience to god”

·        their atrocities as “humbleness”

·        their barbarities as “commitment to god”, viz, to the accursed one of god and

·        an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) they call “god” etc. 



That is what changes when bastards n’ bastards convert to the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23). Nothing has improved but worsened. The only change is how the start disguising their depravity by confessing the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23). They do not convert to refrain from depravity, foul play and other sorts of bestiality. They only see that they fail accomplishing their depravity frankly and change to perfidy (underhandedness) by converting to Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ, the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23). Breaking down before converting to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus “Christ”) means that the concerned were defeated by the disgrace of their nature and mind and now want to accomplish their evilness by means of perfidy, viz, putting on a sheep’s clothing to hide underhandedly their depraved mind, nature and criminal intents (foul play) behind it.

One successfully can perpetrate the utmost outrage and atrocities, if one fakes it as (moral) “boon” or “benefaction” to the victims and to the public. Those are the “glad tidings” of the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) for his felons’ sect (Christianity)!

The bastards n’ dastards first before having become Christians had been curs, now when having become Christians, viz, having been converting to the accursed one ofgod (see: De 21, 23) they additionally have become the perfidious , hypocrites and sanctimonious ones, viz, perfidious curs in furs! Those slobs’ n’ flops, those miscarriages of soul, mind and nature do not convert to “Christ” to refrain from their depravity but by converting to mendacity, hypocrisy and insidiousness, viz, to “Christ” and Christian sect, want to give a fling to it and thus to make their disgracefulness, foul mouth and foul play unassailably accomplished.

More over, the now "born" or "reborn" Christians still have become accomplices of the earth the most organized crime, viz, thoroughly depraved, thoroughly insidious, thoroughly unscrupulous, pukka brutes. Little thieves, deceivers and rogues and/or creeps n’ crooks and/or bastards n’ dastards additionally have become religious Mafiosi by converting to Christian perfidy or to the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23).

This is the "mystery" why in Western hemisphere the moral institution setting the “moral standards” is the world most and most abominable organized crime. E.g., the most expert of murder and mass-murders set the (spurious) standards for “protection of lives”. The most liars the standards of spurious “honesty” … Objektivations (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) even presume to set the (spurious) standards of spurious sexual “morals” or how to spuriously manage the marriage bed etc. …
What do you expect else from the accursed of god (see: De 21:23) and the sick needing a physician (Lu 5:31)?


Oh yeah, when the bastards n’ dastards can play the „upholder of moral standards“… Each Christian wants to be in that number …!  

Christianity is a threat to humankind because it perfidiously unleashes depravity, Satanic traits and foul play by providing a faked "moral" disguise for it and thus makes it unrecognizable and hereby unassailable.  Hereby, crimes and criminal that must be fought and controlled become (almost) perfect.  What is hidden (by its moral reverse) is unknown.  What is unknown that cannot be fought and defeated, at all! Consequently, crimes become the (almost) perfect crime.


What  Christian organized crime feigns to stand for (by its sheep’s clothing), it fights and what it shams to fight, it stands for. Those  objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) are only interested in the result and in nothing else!


One important question those converted or reborn Christians do not put and do not answer is the following one: Well, if the Christians allegedly and dubiously only can be decent people by believing in an accursed one of god (see: De 21,23), why are those "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) obsessed to Christianize the healthy that do not need a physician (see: Lu 5:31-32) and that are decent citizen without worshiping an accursed one of god (see: De 21,23) as „god“? Christians know that they are foul players and want to hide themselves as such by the Christianly brain washed masses of people, viz, by forcing  everybody to be a hypocrite,  perfidious one, foul player and creep and crook as they are. If everybody is Christian, viz, a hypocrite, liar, deceiver, self-deceiver, crook, rogue, thug n’ schmuck, villain n’ Christian, Christian foul play, perfidy, depravity and abomination are not striking.


That is the function of the baptismal certificate “Christians”. Those “Christians” are only the slaves of Christian slaveholders (of Christian rogues in frocks). They are large majority of Christians simultaneously believing  in everything and nothing, too coward as to resist their  evildoers (Christian slaveholders) parroting almost everything the Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) burn into their “hard disk” … Christian rogues in frocks need those baptismal certificate “Christians”.



First, there are no slaveholders if there are no slaves. Therefore, each Christian cannot become slaveholder. However, this is not the most important function of the large majority of baptismal certificate “Christians” in Christian slavery. The following is most important: The masses of brainwashed baptismal certificate “Christians” shall perform a milieu for Christian slaveholders or rogues that accepts Christian hypocrisy, perfidy, underhandedness and foul play, in particular, Christian crimes, murders, mass-murders, genocide and other sorts of barbarities according to the pretexts and apologies the (Christian) perpetrators drum into them. For instance, those Christian slaves shall provide, that Christian atrocities that are past description and beyond belief but real shall be called and „understood“ as “martyrdoms” of Christian “martyrs” and/or “obedience to god”, “perfection of society” etc. as the Christian slaveholders perfidiously want to play down, repress  and cant the foul play of their organized crime (Christian sect).



As Christian automatons and/or robots baptismal certificate “Christians” have to provide that Christian hypocrisy, perfidy, depravity and foul play (crimes, murder, outrages, atrocities and other sort of barbarities  resulting from Christian perfidy) do not get ostracized or banned but stays socially accepted. Therefore, the baptismal certificate “Christians” more or less unconsciously care  that Christian "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) are not regarded as that what they are: objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy but as “good shepherds”, “reverends”, “saints”, “holy fathers” etc. In Christianly enslaved parts of the globe, Christian brutes mostly are not allowed to be named as brutes but are to call “reverends”, if one does not want to be prosecuted by those “martyrs” … etc. However, in those parts of the world they are allowed to perpetrate everything, even utmost abomination. Hence,  those allegedly indifferent baptismal certificate “Christians” -- actually and simultaneously believing in everything and nothing what Christian sect is puking -- care for the reputation of Christian rogues being regarded as that what they fake by their sheep’s clothing but not by the mug of the brute they are hiding.  


In this manner,  objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31), viz, our planet’s most brutes mutate to “reverends” and/or “saints” that otherwise would be in psychiatric departments or in jail.


Thus, it is impossible to convince Christian rogues of the truths as everybody else living a lie. More over, here one has to take into account what this organized crime pays! Convincing Christians of the truths is the same as talking to the Mafia of Southern Italy to give up their profitable crimes … It is about taking away the milieu of baptismal certificate “Christians”, viz, the slaves, from Christian rogues (slaveholders). Actually baptismal certificate “Christians” are not evil from the bottom of their heart. They generally are misguided and mostly hoodwinked regarding their good mind. If the organized perfidy and foul play (Christian sect) loses the relevant masses of baptismal certificate “Christians”, then the possibility opens to judge Christian sect impartially and this means the beginning of the end of this organized crime. Demonstrably, until present-day in Christianly enslaved countries the crimes of this organized crime are biasedly „understood“ that way the perpetrators want to have it. That is what is to change.


The Christians know that. Today, they mostly accept the baptismal certificate “Christians”. However, the matter changes if it is about rivals or even Christian competitors, like, for instance, Jehovah’s witnesses, in particular, in Christianized countries where there is no separation of state and religion like in the U.S.A. or in France. Especially in Germany, there are to watch terrorist campaigns of Christian sect similar to those ones one already know from Christian and German anti-Semitism. Since the 70ties of the last century, Christianity in Germany persecutes Hare Krishna, Scientology, and even Christian rivals like, for instance, Jehovah Witnesses or even those who are favoring voluntary euthanasia.

Why? As said, baptismal certificate “Christians” further grant that Christian hypocrisy, perfidy, foul play and barbarities etc. are „understood“ that way the Christian rogues in frocks want to have them “judged”. However, the rivals competing with Christian organized crime certainly will no do so, especially if it is about the question: Who is better or even who is the best? Here, they soon will point to weak points of their rival. If this case happens, Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy know that they have no chance to win. Christian organized crime only can exist if the milieu deems Christian depravity, perfidy, foul play and abomination according to impartial Christian “views”, i.e., pretexts and “excuses”. This again worsens foul play of Christian organized crime. Once starting deceit, one cannot be but criminal forever! Thoroughly, truths only can be suppressed by crimes.


 Similarly, the Nazis could perpetrate their abomination because they lived within a Christian milieu that accepted Nazi atrocities like the Christian ones. What Christians did not accept, they successfully impeded, finally, e.g., Nazi euthanasia. Today, Nazis are exposed to be utmost brutes because they lost the milieu accepting their barbarities. Now, even the Christians have to sham that they allegedly have nothing to do with anti-Semitism and its corresponding mass-murders on the Jews. The latter, even the mass-murders on the Jews did not start the Nazis but Christians. It is not off the point to call Nazism a political variant of Christian organized crime. Consequently, it is no question about what is good and evil but what one is able to palm as “good”, “evil”, “god” or “devil” off on individuals. As Christian history demonstrates, the lacking evidence can be replaced by foul play on those, who dare to contradict. Therefore, the Christians shysters succeed in fobbing a felon, death penalty convict, desperado, terrorist, an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) and fellow objectification (incarnation) of perfidy, i.e. "sick one needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) of theirs off as “god” on all the duffers n’ bluffers, blackguards, rogues and other sorts of foul players or goofs n’ fools. It is only a question of manipulating social environments. If the Nazis would had won World War II their atrocities -- being almost that beyond belief like the Christian ones -- would had accepted by the corresponding Christian milieu like Western societies put up with Christian Mafia’s atrocities and barbarities.

If Christian sect of Mafia is deprived of its slaves, viz, of its masses of baptismal certificate “Christians”, then Christian perfidy and all its spite, hatred, foul play and abomination resulting from it (perfidy) will be regarded as that what it really is: As necessary trait of unprincipled shysters, bastards n’ dastards, crooks and religious rogues. “the sick needing a physician” (Lu 5:31) place an accursed of god (see: De 21:23) instead of god as “god”! A bad tree only can produce bad fruits (see: Mt 7:17-18) and Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) only can produce befouling foul mouths and corresponding foul play (spite, hatred, infamy, crimes, outrages, terror, atrocities etc.), everything camouflaged by its reverse, corresponding perfidy.

Christian persistent missionary work shall provide that social milieu that Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) can be up to their mischief without being reputed as deceivers, crooks, criminals, felons, desperadoes and terrorists. Therefore, Christian organized crime wants to eliminate those, who do not want to be their slaves. Hence, Christian crimes are no traffic accidents but are the very intention that is hidden behind their sheep’s clothing (see: Lu 19:27). This starts with spites and ends up with prison, murder and even mass-murders (stakes). To say it unambiguously: The reasons for Christian crimes and abomination are Christian lies, deceits and self-deception. Everything else the Christian puke for transparent reasons is new lies, new deceits and is new self-deception by which Christian original lies, original deceit and original self-deception shall be defended and made unassailable. Christian creeps n’ crook, rogues n’ frogs, schmucks, thugs, nuts n’ mugs in the muck fake to be “martyrs” of the truths but there are hardly human beings lying that much and impudently as unscrupulously like the Christians do. On top of everything, even their mockup “god” and fellow Mafioso already said this (see: Joh 16:12) …

Therefore, those objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31)vomit the cry that these (Christian) brutes of all brutes allegedly are “martyrs” suffering always, steadily and persistently “martyrdom” … I am coming near to burst into tears …! Christian rogues know that they deserve each utmost punishment one can imagine for their abominable foul mouth and foul play! There is no organized crime outdoing the Christian one. They know that they still are spared since they established a milieu that first does not only accept their perfidy, foul mouth, foul play, barbarities and other sorts of abomination but secondly even takes part in perpetrating them. Especially the mass-murders of the accursed of god (see: De 21:23), viz, of the Christians in Europe that in particular were perpetrated when Christian pope terrorists called for crusades, only could be accomplished by the masses of baptismal certificate “Christians”. The latter primarily ought to put a stop to the barbarities of this organized crime. However, the masses correspondingly were brainwashed.

Even if opponents of this organized crime do not find a sect fighting this organized crime of Christianity, they are to slaughter as being direct denominational competitors, since they could establish a social environment that does not accept and cant Christian perfidy, foul mouth and foul play, e.g., Christian unparalleled spite, crimes outrages, atrocities and other sorts of Christian barbarities. Therefore, Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) running the risk that they cannot pose as “martyrs” any longer but are debunked as such what they really are. Consequently, apart from that what the concerned one is doing, he is to libel, jail and slaughter, already because he is guided by another ideology that presumably or possibly does not accept an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) as „god“. He is an enemy because he does not accept and cant Christian foul mouth and foul play as “boons”, “brotherly love”, “spiritual welfare”, “charity”, “obedience to god” etc. That would be the outset of the end of Christian perfidy, respectively, organized crime. That is what Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy know and that is why they cannot but exterminate those who do not kowtow to their will to power by perfidy at any price and at all costs.


Therefore, one can perpetrate even the utmost and most outrageous atrocities if one first has established the milieu accepting (and canting) it! We already enumerated the tricks, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera – the accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) – contrived for that.
That is why he proudly could puke that he will destroy the house, i.e., the world of human beings and that nobody will be able to restore it (see: the chronicle cant: "gospel"> imputed to Thomas, Logion 71).

Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") was sure becoming planet Earth's most successful criminal. He knows to become that successful, since he pilfers the presuppositions by which individuals are able to recognize and to fight foul mouth, foul play and barbarities as such.

Providing a sheep’s clothing of “love”, “truth”, “god”, “honor”, “reverends”, “saints” and “holy fathers” etc. to poor sods, miscarriages of nature, depraved ones, soulless brutes and unscrupulous objectifications of perfidy (“the sick needing a physician”, Lu 5:31), viz, to the moral scum of the world, is what makes success of Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy. Of course, everything occurs on the condition that the instigator of this abomination, i.e., an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) is worshiped as “god” instead of god, in return.


  „You Christians are like the leeches that extract the worst blood and leave back the cleaner one.”[v]




Here, Roman antique emperor Julian (332 – 363) correctly realizes negative selection (of evil) of this foul players’ sect. It will not become easy to get rid off Christian slaveholders and/or those objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31). These shysters will not give up their masking (sheep’s clothing) of each moral reverse but will defend it by perfidy, underhandedness and foul play beyond belief as they are bogus beyond belief. Christians are objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy stopping at nothing. They even do not refrain from fobbing an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) off as “god”. That is why they even contrived rogues’ “morals” and felons’ “love” that conspicuously match their own doctrines about Satan! Christian sect did not select an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) as “god” instead of god by dicing. The more they will lose power, the more the objectifications of perfidy will unveil what objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy they are. The planet’s utmost felons pose as “martyrs”, “reverends” and “saints” … This sheep’s clothing is too good as to lose it … They rather smash the world to bits than to forgo their booty, voluntarily. How they cribbed, bagged and grifted it, this religious Mafia will defend it.

All those atrocities of the Christians on old German tribes, Mithras religion, Manichaeism, Jews, Muslims, pagans, philosophers, heretics, Incas, Mayas, Hare-Krishna, in Rwanda (Africa), in particular, those ones on the native American inhabitants turn Christians out to be machines (robots) of crimes that have to swallow up and perpetrate Christian foul play. In addition, those robots are programmed to stand up, sit down and kneel down on command of bastards n’ dastards, creeps n’ crooks or maggots n’ faggots … There is no humane being to see at those soulless robots. Only because they resemble human beings from their outward appearance? Whoever does not respect equity and good faith as human’s social existence that one has outlawed himself. The presupposition of human rights are the commitment to equity and good faith. Only to people respecting this basic principle of social living together human rights are to grant. Those who do not respect this and openly or secretly want to replace it by perfidy have separated from humanity, human rights and thus from humankind. Christianity is no case of religion – not to mention one of the philosophy – but only a criminal one. To make it unmistakably: Human rights only can be granted to individuals respecting equity and good faith. Otherwise, each jail is to be closed.


Here, we also want to say what is to do instead of bestiality of Christianity:


Firstly:  It is to replace Christian perfidy by equity and good faith.

Secondly: It is to replace Christian foul play by fair play.



n chapter 8, we point out the rage of Christian soldiery against science, especially that one on philosophy. Philosophy and science hardly can be developed in Christianly enslaved countries because those Christian miscarriages and flops of nature as everybody else suffering from delusion of grandeur are unwilling to allow any greatness they do not have. One can trace back each foul play of Christian bestiality to the slogan: Never allow any greatness you (Christian) do not have. Not any accidents or “weakness of the flesh” but this very hidden and basic credo Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ and the Christians constitutes Christian perfidy and Christian foul play, viz, Christian as brutes and bestiality of Christianity. In addition, this happens on a very low level. It is not the first aim of Christian bestiality to destroy human beings and the world. That is a difference between Jesus Christ and most of his henchmen. However, after having become a loser and death penalty convict what other choices was left to him? By their phantasmagorias, his henchmen first want to see if they succeed in impeding any greatness, they do not have. If they do not succeed to do so, then the world shall perish …

History of Christian organized crime shows that it tried stopping all science, especially philosophies, and succeeded to do so for more than one millennium. After having failed to stop science even by murders, room to move came into being for science. Then, slowly and weakly science started. However, the hindrance for it (Christian organized crime) stays. Corresponding regions and countries, Christian organized crime still more or less can hinder science and impede non- and anti-Christians to make a career in science, mostly because Christian slobs n' flops of nature cannot stand comparison with non- and anti-Christian philosophers. What is wet is not dry and who is sound, wise and intelligent is no Christian, unless it is about a sick one needing a physician (see: Lu 5:31) and for this reason unable to find out the truths because he cannot bear them (see: Joh 16:12)!

In 529, Christian state terrorists closed the Athena Academy founded by great philosopher Plato (427 – 347 B.C.E). Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy murdered its last head, a woman teacher, by stones. However, who wails about “martyrs” and “martyrdoms”, all over? The Christian terrorists and perpetrators! Christians have no reason to wail. Against those Christian brutes, there is a right of self-defense and even of preemptive first strike before one is murdered by an organized crime of perfidy obstructing and destroying equity and good faith. The Christian provided evidence of that before they came to power, but in particular, when they were reigning. There are also justifications because of wisely foreseeing and those ones with hindsight.

Other Christian silly phantasmagorias, like, for instance, “trinity" considerably hinder if not prevent development of philosophy, too. At all, due to negative selection resulting from Christian perfidy and poor nature, it is to question, if "philosophy" in a Christianly enslaved country can claim to be philosophy. Whatever Christianly conditioned German shepherd is able to "philosophize"...? To be philosopher one first has to be human being. What human being is a Christianly programmed soulless and unscrupulous robot? pertaining to morals (or love) Christians are on the level with Tasmanian devil animals. The latter even do not respect their parents as Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ orders to do (see: Lu 14:26). One would not believe it possible where on earth, in particular, in what dens or wholes there are Christians … Even down under in the lost Tasmanian jungle … You see, there are much more Christians than one prima facie presumes … Whoever does not see this abominable deceit fails to pass the entrance examination of philosophy!

Philosophy under bondage, occupation and slavery of Christian rogues with frocks is pointed out in chapter 8. It does not fit Christian psychological projection of Islam that the whole occident today only can read great ancient Greek philosophers like, for instance, Plato (427 – 347 B.C.E.) and Aristotle (384/3 – 322/1 B.C.E) due to Islamic tolerance toward science. Islam preserved the works of the named philosophers. This is also pointed out in chapter: 9. The Christians destroyed everything because they do not allow any greatness they do not have – and the greatness of philosophers Plato and Aristotle, not at all. Not allowing any greatness Christian damp squibs do not have, that is what constitutes Christianity as bestiality. It further constitutes Christian grudge, hatred, and vindictiveness. It constitutes Christianity, at all.

Italian physicist Galileo Galilee (1564 – 1642) became forced by Christian terrorists to revoke his knowledge that planet earth is circling the sun because Satan and his divine as “omniscient” (Jesus) monkey-Christ – faking to disseminate “truths beyond reason" -- takes the view:


For the earth does not move. Were it to move, it would fall.”[vi]


 That is not due to accidents, "weakness of the flesh" or other excuses of perfidy! That is baloney and foul play necessarily resulting from objectifications  (incarnations)  of perfidy ’ perfidy and delusion of grandeur.


  • That occurs necessarily when desperadoes, bastards n’ dastards suffering from delusion of grandeur set the standards of societies.
  • This is necessary if the lastwant to strut as the “first ones” while accomplishing and perpetuating Satan’s rebellion on god.
  • This happens necessarily if  objectifications or incarnations of perfidy (perfidy that has become human bodies) set the (moral) standards of societies ...
  • That happens necessarily if science is fettered by religious rogues (Christians)!
  • Those are necessary consequences if the lastwant to be regarded as the “first ones”, i.e., reign over those ones to whom they cannot hold a candle and replace lacking abilities and competence by lies, deception and self-deception!
  • This is unavoidable if the scum of the earth, creeps n’ crooks, rogues n’ frogs or “the sick needing a physician” (see: Lu 5:31) presumes to “humbly” lift up itself as “shepherds” and abase their fellow human being to be “sheep” to them.
  • This is inevitable if dimwits, fools n’ goofs, schmucks n’ nuts full of muck presume keeping “truths” that are feigned to be beyond reason but indeed are indescribably dreadful.
  • This happens necessarily if objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) i.e. Christians, reign …
  • This occurs necessarily if megalomaniac ones get to power because. The first principle those brutes try accomplishing is: Never allow any greatness we Christian creeps, flops and miscarriages of nature do not have, at all costs and by stopping at nothing. Consequently, those Christian whippersnappers did not allow Galilee a greatness these damp squibs of nature (Christians) do not have.


To fact that the pope terrorist about 400 years later tried “apologizing” for Galilee, the following is to say :

Firstly: An apology at least consists of two parts: The one that is apologizing and the other that accepts excusing. If both parts do not agree, no apology has come into being. Nobody heard Galilee accepting the Christian terrorist's “apology”. To the objection that Galilee is already dead for about 350 years, it is to answer that there is no possibility of getting forgiveness if the victim already is dead. Then guilt stays because only the victim can forgive and even death penalty convict Jesus monkey-Christ cannot change this. Anyway, one cannot violate a dead one to do that what his torturers - on top of everything for the advantage of their own - want him to do.

Secondly:  Nobody – and an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23) in the least – is able to forgive for somebody else that is not expressively authorized by the victim as everybody is not able to inherit from anybody that is not authorized to do so by the last will (testament) of the concerned one.

Thirdly: Honesty of an apology among others features is to judge from the fact if the reasons leading to that offence are still preserved or abolished. The reasons for Christian crimes on Galilee still exist: Allowing no greatness, the Christian miscarriages of nature do not have! That reason perfidiously shall be strengthened by this mockery of “apology”!

Apart from dreadful perfidy and corresponding foul play resulting from the first , where, oh well, where is that superiority making the Christian creeps n’ crook, slobs n’ flop  and miscarriages of nature to be „shepherds“ and “humbly” and “modestly” abase others to be „sheep“ to them? By forcing Galilee that way the Christian miscarriages of nature presumed to be „good shepherds“ governing over their supposed „goofy sheep“ Galilee … Galileo Galilee is no  unique case. Galilee happens everywhere and every day where Christians grifted power.

The case of Galileo Galilee „impressively“ demonstrates what coercively happens if slobs n’ flops, crooks n’ goofs and other sorts of miscarriages of nature have to power to refuse any greatness they do not have.


Of course, here and elsewhere the author of this treatise does not condemn physically the disabled when call convinced Christian damp squibs, flops and miscarriages of nature etc. We do not target the physically the handicapped but the moral cripples or the moral scum of the earth. Everybody is judged by the judgment he makes (Mt 7:2). Here, we judge “the sick needing a physician” (Lu 5:31), who cannot bear the truths (see: Joh 16:12) and who desire to pose as “the salt of the earth” (Mt 5:13) or “light of the world” (Mt 5:14) or to reign as “shepherds” (slaveholders) above animals like, for instance, “sheep” (slaves) by pretending to keep “authority to bind and to loose what simultaneously is bound and loosed in heaven” etc. The case of Galilee turns out what imbecility and bestiality results from that silly superstition. There are no concepts that properly define bestiality and ridiculousness of Christian sect. There are no words sufficiently describing Christian perfidy, criminality and abomination, at all. Therefore, each term just is an understatement and attempt to illustrate that what is past description and incredible but real. Here, we only condemn religious rogues, desperadoes and terrorists according to the judgments they give. Who did not give these judgments is not judged, here?


If you are in a hurry and cannot read everything of this detailed exposition, it is to recommend reading the paragraph Christians' psychological Projection: "Divorcing Bible Passages from its Context" (of e2062). This paragraph provides a good survey how the scriptures of perfidy (thieves' cant: "glad tiding", "gospels", "New Testament") contradict themselves and one another one. Already due to the contradictions, each dogma the followers of perfidy (Christians) purported necessarily has been divorced from its coherent context, sometimes even of the same chapter of the same "gospel". I.e., what the desperadoes (Christians) argue and fake as dogma or tenet is that what they deem to be expedient for their unscrupulous and brutal will to power and how to trap best others for this reason. Divorcing Bible passages from its context means that the followers of perfidy (Christians) with same (lack of) right could claim the reverse of that what they do or utter as dogma. In that case, they just need to refer to that what they omit, ignore and neglect when preaching something. If concerning the important dogmas the one and its contrary can be argued by referring to that what Christians call "New Testament", authorization of this scripture – that even is said to replace reason – just is lie, deception and fake. It is about sham-authorization hiding the perpetrators' (Christians') foul mouth and foul play to bag that what the desperadoes of perfidy (Christians) do not get when keeping to fair play. It is about to cant foul mouth and foul play by perfidy and to impress as to submit the prey and victims by hoodwinking. 




© 1998 - 2006 HANS HENNING ATROTT - All rights reserved. - Reproduction only for private use and for studies otherwise without permission is strictly prohibited.


[i]  Without naming an author, Men around the pope,  (Zentralverlag der NSDAP. Franz Eher Nachf.,) , Berlin 1938, p. 3f, Translation from the German by my own. German text: Wir Nationalsozialisten wissen es am besten, daß der Glaube Berge versetzt, die Geschichte macht, nicht die Wirtschaftsgesetze und nicht die Waffen allein. Darum wissen wir die Bedeutung einer Macht zu erkennen, die einen  anderen Glauben hat.“ Since this scripture hardly still is available in libraries, I annex copies of it to this exposition:  Coverage, Tittlepage, . p. 2-3 und p. 4-5.

[ii] Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist, published 1895, Translation by H.L. Mencken, published 1920, § 57, on:

[iii] The Gospel of Thomas, translated by Thomas O. Lambdin, logion 98, on: 8 Last call: 06/14/200

[iv]  The Gospel of Thomas, loc.cit., logion 71

[v] Julian, quoted according to: Der Kaiser der Römer gegen den König der Juden – Aus den Schriften Julians, des Abtrünnigen (English more correct title: Against the Galilees),  Berlin 1941, p. 42, German text translated by my own: „Euch Christen geht es jetzt wie  den Blutegeln, die das schlechteste Blut herausziehen und  das reinere zurücklassen.“

[vi]  The Dialogue of the Savior, translated by Stephen Emmel, on:, last call 06/14/2008