Foreword on Friedrich Nietzsche’s „The Anti-Christ"
Nietzsche and the Germans -
Nietzsche a forerunner of Nazi-ideology paving the way for German barbarisms?
Friedrich Nietzsche’s most of his fundamental and principle realizations on Christian sect, are accurate. This sect is about „to avoid knowing what is true “ (anti-Christ § 52) or „lying at any price“ (anti-Christ § 47). In order to accomplish their lies, deceit and crimes and to impede destruction of the Christians' reputation as "upholder of moral standards", Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and his Christian sect especially are about the aim that “that the truth shall never be allowed its rights on any point“ (anti-Christ § 52).
Hans Atrott with a figure of Nietzsche in Roecken (Germany), the place of Nietzsche's birth, in August 2011
The Christians always complained that their adversaries seeing through their deception ridiculed and despised them. Such complaints already uttered early Christian Origen (185 – 254) on Celsus. The latter already inquired into Christianity and its strange allegations in the year 178 and often sneered at this sect.
Click on the picture
Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900) likewise writes in a ridiculing and deriding way on Christendo(o)m.
The critic of Christianity cannot evade the necessity of making Christianity contemptible.” (Anti-Christ § 57)
Why? Here, „sick one needing a physician“ (Lu 5:31) according to the „god“ of their own desire to be regarded as „salt of the earth“ (Mt 5:13) or “light of the world” (Mt 5:14) or even as "city on the mountain" (ibidem). How can the sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) and no physician can help (see: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34) teach the healthy "morals"? How can the sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) exalt themselves as "shepherds" and degrade the healthy as their "sheep". Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) spoke about favorites of heaven that cannot stand comparison with the common man in the street... This necessarily leads to ludicrousness often reminding carnivals, beldams or lunatic asylums. One only can argue respectably on matter that to respect but not on falsehood lies, deceits and outrages. Pertaining Christian sect there is no sincerity. To impute that to Christian sect is already a lie. Whoever presumes to point out this sect in another way thus proves that he is busy with things that are beyond his abilities, unless he does not belong with those desperadoes.
So, no wonder that the debunked Christians try making Nietzsche a bogy by claiming that Nietzsche of all philosophers was a forerunner or even pioneer neither of the truths, nor a liberator of religious enslaving and brainwashing but one of German Nazism that was paving the way of those atrocious Germans and Christians. Who can outdo Christians regarding denouncing, hatred and falsehood (thieves' cant: "love of the enemy")?
Christians while accomplishing their "love": "Jesus came to crucify the world" (The Gospel of Philip) and their program: “Do not resist the evil” (Mt 5:39 “Sermon on the Mountain). Who is worse - the Nazis or the Christians?
One should think that over: A sect that already murdered three 300 millions of individuals and that innovated anti-Semitism and consequently murdered millions of Jews over centuries and thus paved the way of the holocaust to German Nazis diverts attention from its barbarism, atrocities and abomination by accusing an adversary or enemy of its own of having done what Christian sect really perpetrates…
Who can outdo Christian murders (thieves' cant: "charities")?
Who can outdo Christian mass-murder (thieves' cant: "spiritual welfare")?
Who can outdo Christians' perfidies (thieves' cant: "martyrdom for the truths")?
Undoubtedly Christian anti-Semitism is a forerunner of that one of the Nazis. This again is very typical of Jesus and of Christian: a Christian psychological projection! Psychological projections are a feature of the Christian trinity of falsehood, hypocrisy and perfidy. Hereby, the depraved try posing as "upholders of moral standards" by projecting their flaws and criminalities on others, especially, on their rivals and enemies.
Even here Nietzsche hit the nail on the head when realizing that this sect means „lying at any price“ (anti-Christ § 47). Here, one does not only see the speck in the eye of one’s next and refuses to see the log in the eyes of one’s own but is infamous enough as to blame the adversary or enemy for the despicable behavior of one’s own.
Nietzsche was born in 1844 and died in the year 1900. When Nietzsche died, German "Fuehrer" was about to participate in Catholic "Communion" for the first time and just having passed Christian brainwashing, especially stuffed with anti-Semitism. Christian anti-Semitism adopted by Hitler finally murdered about six millions of Jews in Nazi-Germany and other Christianly enslaved European countries. In none of Christianly enslaved European countries it was difficult for the German Nazis to find henchmen in order to murder the Jews.
According to Christian and German standards, collaboration of the Christians to NS-atrocities already is proven by the fact that almost each henchman of the Nazis (including Hitler, Gobbles and Goring) were members of Christian sect.
More than 90 per cent of the concentration camp guardians were cross criminals, i.e. members of the cross crime (thieves' cant: Christianity).
Postwar Germans and Christians in Germany are used to denouncing one another in the following way: If there is one or a few Nazis in an organization for whatever aim, each member of that organization is a Nazi, regardless what he says about Nazism, even if he opposes that barbarianism. I. e., trained in Christian spite and falsehood, the Germans denounce one another that being member in one organization means embracing all the views each other member of that organization has. So, it is a miracle that the Germans did not jail all the members, for instance, of an "association for better food for rabbits" if one member of it killed his wife... According to those German standards, each member of this "association for better food for rabbits" is a murderer if one is a murderer. Of course, according to German clumsy oafs, that association instantly is to prohibit because it is a camouflage organized crime of murder (like Christianity)... So, do not upbraid the Germans that they do not fight murder and mass-murder...!
However, according to the Christian trinity of falsehood, hypocrisy and perfidy, there is one exception: Members of Christian sects have nothing to do with the foul mouth and foul play (crime, murders, atrocities and terror etc.) of Christianity... Even the immediate perpetrators have nothing to do with their crimes but are "reverends", "saints" and "upholders of morals standards"... Christianly enslaved societies are a bedlam! Thinking something else is to punish as "blasphemy" according to the horizon of German clumsy oafs...
Involvement of Christian sect in the Nazis’ crimes of mass-murders already is proven by the pope’s deal with the Nazi (e.g. concordat in 1933). It was about a business in exchange with the Nazi putting up with millions of murders for the benefit of Christian sects. In return of this gift, the Christian parties voted for the "Law of authorization" of March 1933 providing the legal basis for all the NS-crimes. Christians' collaboration to the Nazis’ holocaust already is proven by the facts that Germans’ pogroms from 1933 – 1945 on the Jews in no way were the first ones, as well in Germany as in Europe. Christianly enslaved people always needed a scapegoat for their Christian tormentors. Since those dastards were too coward as to revenge themselves on their real evildoer (the Christian criminals posing as "upholders of moral standards"), they vicariously revenged themselves on the Jews. All the evilness the Christian robots spite at the Jews are features that do not fit the Jews but the Christian tormentors, i.e. the sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) and no physician can help (see: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34).
Whenever the pope called out for crusades, i.e. for about one millennium ago, the Christian trained hyenas did not understand why they arduously should travel to remote Palestine in order to grab and slaughter Jews if there are a lot of them right the next corner or block. Therefore, to each crusade there was added a holocaust on the Jews in Christian European countries.
I.e. after world war II Nazis did not only serve as scapegoats for the Christians' mass-murders on the Jews. Trying to divert their attention from their substantial collaboration in the holocaust, false, depraved and infamous Christians also to distract from the mass-murders, they already perpetrated on the Jews starting already in the 3rd and 4th century. The Christians used to calling their mass-murders on the Jews “moral anti-Semitism” in order to feign a difference to the holocaust of German Nazis. However, the only difference consists in juggling with names – very, very typical of Christian!
Well, in the end an adversary of Christendo(o)m Friedrich Nietzsche has to serve as scapegoat for the Christian sect – full of mass-murders and genocides - and for German desperadoes, i.e. someone that warned of that criminal sect and those folks as much as hardly someone else did!
Thus inadvertently and indirectly the Christians confirm Nietzsche’s realization about their „corruption of souls“ (Anti-Christ § 58) or that they are an organized crime , i.e., a“ vampirism of pale, subterranean leeches” (Antichrist § 49) that could not be outdone. There is no more unscrupulous organized crime but Christian religious Mafia!
In order to be a forerunner or even pioneer of Nazism two premises are imperative:
Firstly, one has to be an anti-Semite and:
Secondly, one has to esteem the Germans highly (as supermen), actually that much that they are entitled to rule the world.
Christians are used to accomplishing one prerequisite, at least – most German Christians, even the pope of the then time, both. To Nietzsche not even one of these premises is to apply.
We already argued Christian anti-Semitism. The Christians could make the German Nazis to adopt it. Now we are going to provide evidence that Nietzsche rejected anti-Semitism:
"This is our conviction: we publish it to the whole world; we live and die for it--let us respect all who have convictions!"--I have actually heard such sentiments from the mouths of anti-Semites. On the contrary, gentlemen! An anti-Semite surely does not become more respectable because he lies on principle. . .(Anti-Christ § 55)
Here, the anti-Semite is depicted as a liar and deceiver comparable to a Christian, if not a Christian. In contrast with Christian fooling, I assume that Nietzsche did not want to present himself as a liar lying in principle and from the very outset (as Christians are used to doing)… It is superfluous to add any word else…
The next premise would be that Nietzsche would have had esteemed the Germans being the top form of human lives of evolution (being superior to all their fellow humans) and consequently being entitled to rule the world. However, Nietzsche gives more unhappiness to the Germans. His views on the Germans -- conditioned by those „insignificant bigots and the three-fourths insane“ (anti-Christ § 43), i.e.. Christians -- do not differ much from those of mine, if at all. We both deem the German clumsy oafs in the same way, roughly. Already in the beginning of his “Antichrist” Nietzsche clues his judgment on the Germans:
" I (Nietzsche) forbid myself to say what I think of the Germans....." (Antichrist § 11)
However, in the long run of the „Antichrist“, Nietzsche opens the door of his judgement on the Germans a crack. He tells us how much he disdains the Germans. And instead of deeming the Germans to be supermen – as the large majority of Germans are used to kidding themselves – he thinks the Germans to be the equivalent of Christian „bigots“ (§ 58) and „subterranean leeches“ (§ 49).
" These Germans, I confess, are my enemies: I despise all their uncleanliness in concept and valuation, their cowardice before every honest yea and nay. For nearly a thousand years they have tangled and confused everything their fingers have touched; they have on their conscience all the half-way measures, all the three-eighths-way measures, that Europe is sick of,--they also have on their conscience the uncleanest variety of Christianity that exists, and the most incurable and indestructible--Protestantism. . . . If mankind never manages to get rid of Christianity the Germans will be to blame. . . . (Antichrist § 61)
We have good cases to assume that the Nazi-Germans would have punished Friedrich Nietzsche by death penalty if he would have said this during their rule and if the could get hold of him. The last mentioned quotation of his sounds as if it would be a play of mine...! Well, Nietzsche shall be a forerunner of his enemies’ (Germans’) striving for ruling the world? Don’t make me laugh! Why not? Because one does not love what one hates and one does not regard somebody as one’s enemy whom one is loving, except one belongs with that "cowardly, effeminate and sugar-coated gang gradually alienated all souls“ (§ 58) calling themselves Jesus "Christ" or Christians.
Everybody commanding feelings like, for instance, “love” just turns out to be a paltry, wretched, ruined and miserable individual, in whom his soul (possibility of experiencing feelings and emotions) already has died. The only emotions those zombies are able to accomplish any longer are those of irascibility, hatred, revenge and self-pity. The evidence?: The traits of Yehoshua-ben-Pandera, (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") – this spiteful little devil and prophet of all the mad ones “needing a physician” (Lu 5:31-52). This hypocrisy, falsehood and fiendishness is that what sets Nietzsche (as well as me) against this sect of murderers that assassinated already and approximately 300 hundreds of millions of humans and the corresponding nation that help to perpetrate its barbarities as no other one did.
" The Germans have destroyed for Europe the last great harvest of civilization that Europe was ever to reap--the Renaissance. Is it understood at last, will it ever be understood, what the Renaissance was? The transvaluation of Christian values,--an attempt with all available means, all instincts and all the resources of genius to bring about a triumph of the opposite values, the more noble values. . . . ( Anti-Christ § 61)
“ Consider the fact that it is precisely the aid of German swords and German blood and valour that has enabled the church to carry through its war to the death upon everything noble on earth! At this point a host of painful questions suggest themselves. The German nobility stands outside the history of the higher civilization: the reason is obvious. . . Christianity, alcohol--the two great means of corruption. . . ( Anti-Christ § 60).
Here, the German philosopher, who died in 1900, predicts that what happened, in particular, in the 20th century: German crimes and atrocities often also were Christian barbarities, e.g. the holocaust. Christendo(o)m and the Germans formed a symbiotic relationship, e.g. the concordat of Adolph Hitler and Catholic pope in 1933. By the way, Catholic Church is perfidious and unscrupulous enough as to suck advantage of this concordat (with Hitler of 1933) even today. Christian Mafiosi always could rely on goofy German clumsy oafs, since this nation of soulless biological robots has become Christianly programmed.
""Divine Providence," which every third man in "educated Germany" still believes in, is so strong an argument against God that it would be impossible to think of a stronger. And in any case it is an argument against Germans! . . . (Anti-Christ § 52)
Friedrich Nietzsche deems the Germans to be a similar blemish on humankind – anyway a misfortune to the world – as Christian sect is in a way that never can be outdone. This is the meaning of that quotation. Here, I am convinced to represent Nietzsche appropriately when saying to the German clumsy oafs: Me (Nietzsche), I am neither a representative of the Germans nor of the Christians nor their common fooling. On the contrary, I (Nietzsche) already warned of that what could happen if a felons’ sect mates a felons’ nation. If one would have watched and complied with Nietzsche’s knowledge, the Christian and the German abominations , those outrages and barbarities of the Germans and Christians would not have occurred in the 20th century, in Europe and North Africa.
Thus Nietzsche inevitably has become a constituent of collective German and Christian deception but also of unscrupulousness resulting from that delusion in Christianly enslaved countries, in particular in Germany, in fact. Why necessarily? Because for lies, truths are life-threatening "cancer" and the deceivers are used to juggling their lies as „truths“ - in that abyss or cesspool of Christian depravity and corruption.
Let us summarize: Nietzsche told the Germans and Christians capable of that what they perpetrated, in particular, in the 20th century and especially in Germany. Nietzsche wouldn’t put anything past the Christians and Germans and that is precisely the way the Christians and the Germans abominably turned out to be. Complying with Nietzsche realizations or those ones of ancient Greek philosopher Celsus (about the year 178 C.E.) could have successfully prevented those catastrophes. Hardly more exactly humanitarian benefits of Nietzsche's "Anti-Christ" are to demonstrate.
The rule of the capable and distinguished ones instead of those of the failures and miscarriages of nature does not mean and never may mean that the right of existence of the latter should be denied, but that they are not allowed to continue to fake and feign what they aren’t, e.g. models of humans. That means that the sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) and no physician can help (see: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34) in fact get a proper physician and cannot continue to live off their megalomania purportedly being „salt of the earth“ (Mt 5,13) or “light of the world” (Mt 5,14) and thus can establish the reign of hatred and vengeance of the depraved and criminals and of those that turned out badly by nature. Then, they cannot continue to prevent and destroy any greatness those creeps n’ crooks and spiteful little dastards, desperadoes or skunks and hyenas do not have…
Apart from some brutes, nobody wants to slaughter the miscarriages of nature or even disable ones but help them, of course. In Christendo(o)m it is not about help for miscarriages of nature or for those, who turned out badly by nature or even disabled ones. So, fighting Christianity does not mean fighting the disable or miscarriages of nature but to stay by the truths that those are miserable individuals needing our help. However, those miscarriages and failures of nature are no models of humans every individual has to strive for. These precisely are the furtive lies, deceptions and delusion, the Christians perfidiously disseminate for the selfishness of their own. The Christian predators project the flaws of their own on the handicaps of the disabled fooling themselves that they cure their flaws when caring for the disabled...
The perfidious Christians do not want to help disabled ones. The disable are only a camouflage that shall veil the depravity, abjection and fiendishness of the Christians’ mind, intentions and programs. Well, the Christians only help themselves, at the expenses of the disable since like any other Mafia, Christian sects regard the social business as a protection money zone of their own. The Christians delude themselves that they are no cripples of mind, spirit, psyche and especially morals when dealing with sick, disabled ones and cripples. They fool themselves: That is the other one and not me (the Christian) that is the cripple…! While caring for cripples and disabled ones, the Christians conceitedly are used to hypostatizing treatment of their own, i.e. of their crippled mind, soul (psyche) and “morals”. I.e., Christians' activities for the disabled and cripples are psychological projections. The physical cripple and disable one stands for the Christian cripple of mind and morals. While caring for the physical cripple the Christians indirectly want to care for themselves (treating their own sickness of mind and morals). It is about a vicarious treatment for themselves! Again, one can see that everything vicariously goes, in those sects of foul play. That is Christian “brotherly love” and “charity”…
So, the miscarriages of nature (Christians) selfishly only want to help themselves, especially to extirpate any greatness those megalomaniac and miserable ones do not have. The disabled and cripples serve as a pretext for the Christian terrorists to destroy any greatness those (Christian) megalomaniac creeps and crooks do not have. Furthermore, in order to get their foul mouth and foul play unassailable the dregs of humankind (thieves' cant: Christians) always are used to tearing down the fellow humans to the poor level of their own, i.e. to that one of the (Christian) dregs of humankind. Christianity means: nobody is allowed being better than the sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) and no physician can help (see: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34). If they can, the desperadoes (thieves' cant: Christians) even destroy individuals being superior to them by jailing, torturing and murdering... It is no matter of ethics but of megalomania and political powers!
By the way, even according to the doctrines of their own, the Christians’ buckling allegedly to „help“ the infirm, sick and disabled etc. is of Satanic mind. According to Christian doctrines, Satan as former Angel fell from god since he did not agree with god who was first (god) and who was last (Satan). Satan wanted himself to be god (see: Isa 14:14). I.e., the first ever Christian is Satan. As the Christians, he did not want to allow a greatness he does not have. At last, nobody should be better than he (Satan) is. According to Christian doctrines, Satan only break with god for that „moral consideration“ (see: ibidem). Satan made up his mind to wage the war of the last on the first, i.e. god - precisely like Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) and his fellow Christian terrorists are used to doing so… Like Satan, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) and his Christian Mafiosi wage war as the last on the first. Satan and Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and Christian sect have the same program – according to the Christians’ doctrines...!!! I.e., the „trinity“ (of Satan, Christ and Christian sects) has the same program of incredible barbarianism and abominations that is past description. In order to camouflage their war of grudge, envy, hatred and vindictiveness on account of their inferiority, this trinity of Satan, his Anointed One (Greek: Christos) and their Christians do not say that they do not want to destroy any greatness they do not have. They pretend, i.e. lie, only to care for the sick, disabled, orphans, homeless and widows (lacking a sexual life with their husbunds the Christians obviously want to provide for them)... In addition, they also allege that nobody else but they (Satan, his Anointed One and all their Christians) care for the latter... Since they defend their occupation of the social buisiness as source of revenue as any other Mafia their protection money zone, they even might be right... So, do not chide the Christians for always lying and deceiving...
Satan mainly accomplishes the advantage of his own by waging war on the first one (god) and Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) and his negative selection of the sick needing a physician (Christians) on the healthy (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10), viz, on those to which they cannot hold a candle. This is unbearable for these megalomaniacs. Their war on the healthy or first as they pretended as care of the sick, disables and homless etc. So, depravity, criminality and abomination, i.e. foul play, is fobbed off as "moral execellence"!
Nothing is free of charge! Thus, the homo scelestus (homo=human, scelestus=criminal), i.e. Ben-Pandera, wants to become “god” of the Christian shmucks by flattering the Christian impostors as "the salt of the earth" etc. The fact that no disable one is allowed to become shmuck of Christian priest, monk or nun debunks hypocrisy, falsehood, mendacity and venom camouflaging Christians' "commitment" to the infirm. This fake of "charity" or "sacrifice for their next" is as an artifice of destroying any greatness the Christian unscrupulous creep, crooks and miscarriage of nature do not have, under "moral" pretense. Christian sect is the only sect with such an apartheid of excluding the "beloved" disabled from such „jobs“. For instance, in Islam there are many blind ones as priests, unimaginable in Christianity! More over, this speaks volumes on that what is veiled behind the mask of “charity”, “brotherly love”, “spiritual welfare” etc. Christian sect is a Satanic enterprise accomplishing Satan’s program on god... The disabled and the sick even serve as pretence for the Christians' war of envy, hatred and vindictiveness on those being better than those furtive and unscrupulous desperadoes are that compulsively suffer from delusion of grandeur (thieves' cant: Christians).
Why is Christian shammed „charity“ and „brotherly love“ Satanic even according to the Christians’ doctrines? Basically, both (Satan and Jesus) want to rub god’s nose in the failures of nature and thus “morally” puff themselves up. This even verbatim is expressed in early Christian gospels, which the Christians later wanted to annihilate. In the “apocryphal” "Gospel of Philip" that Nietzsche or any other anti-Christ did not write one can read:
“The world came about through a mistake. For he who created it wanted to create it imperishable and immortal. He (god!!!) fell short of attaining his desire. For the world never was imperishable, nor, for that matter, was he who made the world...“
I.e., similar to Satan – according to the doctrines of their own – Christians deem „god“ to be a failure… That is why they lift up that Satanic monstrosity –- (Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) instigating the outrages and abominations of this sect -- as their „god“… That alleged „brotherly love“ and „charity“ for infirmed, disable and sick ones turns out to be a masquerade of Satanic hatred on god, humankind and humanity.
This is also confirmed by the "Letter to the Romans":
Ro 5:10 NRSV
10 For if while we (Christians) were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son,
I.e., the trinity of Satan, his Anointed One (Greek: Christos) and all the Christians only reconciles with god, on condition that god makes a fellow of theirs (Satan or his Anointed One) as Co-God and obeys to this contrived "Co-God"... The author of this treatise is able to demonstrate that this "death of Satan's Son" (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") did not occur in the way, this trinity lies, bluntly. Consequently, the trinity of Satan, his Anointed One (Greek: Christos) and the Christians stay the enemies of god since the condition of "reconciliation" never became fulfilled... Already, the idea of being enemies of god and to stipulate the conditions to god on which one is willing to give up enmity (on god), is an outrage beyond bounds and past description! Only a bedlam can produce such fabrications...! Is not Ben-Pandera right calling his followers he sick needing a physician (see: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10) and no physician can help (see: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34). So, do not upbraid him for always lying and deceiving...!
In addition, Christian “charity” is a lucrative business! Mostly Christianly trained Mafiosi of politicians provide this “protection money zone” for this criminal sect, so that the Christian Mafiosi do not need to raid banks in order to finance all the foul mouth and foul play...
Conspicuously the Christian doctrines also say that Satan is ugly because he is evil. This means that evilness of the scum of creatures is to realize by their insufficient physical appearance, too… As far as Christians are concerned, this knowledge undoubtedly is correct. Christians' foul mouth (perfidy) and foul play results from the Christians' inferiority hidden by decked-out outfits... According to the Christian doctrines, god took away all beauty from Satan – who is used putting upside down and downside up like Jesus "Christ" and the Christians - he (god) had bestowed to him (Satan) as former angel. So it came to happened that Satan is as ugly and misshapen as Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and sin...[iii] What a coincidence…! Thus Satan (and Jesus as well the Christians) downrightly became a ganging up and conspiracy of desperado-felons wanting to unleash their resentment, hatred and avenge under moral pretence:
“Having said this, Satan became horrid and of fearsome look, and his followers became hideous; because for their rebellion God took away from them the beauty wherewith he had endued them in creating them. Whereat the holy angels, when, lifting their heads, they saw how terrible a monster Satan ;had become, and his followers, cast down their face to earth in fear. Then said Satan: ‘O Lord, you have unjustly made me hideous, but I am content thereat, because I desire to annul all that you shall do. And the other devils said: ‘Calf him not Lord, O Lucifer, for you (Jesus "Christ") are Lord.’ “
In contrast with usual Christian faking, feigning, hypocrisy, falsehood and mendacity even according to Satan’s, pardon, Christians’ views god and the angels are nice and Satan as ugly as Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) or sin… Here, Christian „charity“ pertaining infirm, disable and sick ones etc. indirectly and inadvertently, this debunks the mind of avenge on god. The hypocrites and liars „thank“ god for so many things but behind the mask or even thank they are that angry with god's purported failures as to declare and wage war on him like Satan modelled it to do… You never guess how much Satan’s and Jesus’ Christ’s views resemble each other:
One can say that Christianity is the continuation of Satan's revolt on god. Here, avenge is expressed which this Mafia in disguise of a religion sect lives off to the full in the criminal history of this (Christian) sect. Finally, Christian history is the most conclusive evidence that Christianity "apparent is in the working of Satan" (2Th 2:9). Satan as well Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ“) – as far they are not the same chew revenge for their conceited or real inferiority by god or nature. This precisely is the nature of Christian “charity” and “brotherly love”...
Why are the Christians used to disguising this by such a lot of affectation and fuss of shammed “morals” ?
Satan and/or his Anointed One (Greek: Christos) are not stupid. They know that one has to deprive the opponents or enemies of the arguments they fatally can fight the lies, deceits, crimes, outrages and abominations of theirs. Furthermore, at first one can fight crimes and criminals by moral standards. Consequently, Satan and Jesus manipulate moral concepts by semantic simulations („juggling with names“) , psychological projections and even provocation crimes. Thus, in advance the opponent or enemy is deprived of his most important weapon in order to fight that ganging up of religious Mafiosi:
For Satan, his son or Christ, other sorts of felons, Mafiosi and murderers semantic simulations („juggling with names“) of „morals“, „charity“, „loving the enemies“, „brotherly love“ „justice“, „truths“ , etc. only serve the purpose of cribbing in advance the weapons from the opponent or enemy by which the latter could defend themselves against the evil and their foul play. Christianity is a religious Mafia or desperadoes' sect with criminal morals. The Christians morally even rank below top life-forms of mammals and marsupials since the latter even love their parents what the Christians demonstrably are unable to do (see: Lu 14:26).
By Christian sect, Satan accomplished his program putting upside "down" and downside "up", i.e. making the very, very last regarded to be the “first”, the perpetrators as “victims”, the felons as “saints” and Satan as the “god”… That is why Christians incessantly talk about "god"... Christianity is Satanism because Satan, his son or some else Satanic biped has become the sect’s “god”…
Deformity Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and all his spiritual cripples and brutes of Christians want to poison each interpersonal relationship. And in order to get that poisoning unassailable, this spiteful little devil of Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and all his fellow desperadoes are used to faking that venom as “brotherly love”, “charity”, intrinsic and summit of all “morals”… Thus he and his fellow Christian terrorists want to get their victims guilelessly be trapped.
The Christians’ allegation that others allegedly want to slaughter each sick, invalid, disable ones or those that turned out badly by nature is nothing but a psychological projection of their own. Otherwise, it is not to understand why disabled are banned from the job of Christian clergies etc.
Christian terrorists are only capable of poisoning good interpersonal relationship. Insinuating to others that they want to kill all the disabled is also their self-hatred due to their inferiority. This indeed is Satan's Anointed One's (Greek: Christos') commitment to "charities" to the "disabled":
Lu 19: 27 RSV
27 But as for these enemies of mine (Jesus "Christ"), who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them before me.’
Because the Christians want to inflict that on their adversaries or enemies they insinuate that fiendishness and abomination of their own by another psychological projection on others. Nothing but a psychological projection of those fiends of humankind (Tacitus).
A superior one does not need to murder the inferior (or Christian) in order to demonstrate his superiority. However, the “weak” have to assassinate the superior in order to get rid of their recognition to be the inferior or the last ones. If everything thus is levelled to the Christian niveau of the very, very last ones, the Christians or the last one can play the "strong" and "first"… Those are the reasons for Christian murders, outrages, abominations and other sorts of Christian foul mouth and foul play…!
Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and his negative selection of the fiends and brutes, i.e. Christians, rebel against god, truths, beauty, good and nature (while feigning the reverse). They want to fob themselves, i.e. the miscarriages of nature, mind and morals that turned out worse than the average human by nature, i.e. the last, off as models of humans (i.e. as the "first"). Consequently, Christianity is war of the homo scelestus on the homo sapiens! This further means, that Satan's, his Christ's and their Christians' foul play is not only rejected by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and any sensible one but also by god, according to the Christians’ own doctrines on Satan. Hark, hark!
So, according to that Christian “tenet”, this precisely is intrinsic of Satan. Being a former Angel, Satan rebelled against god because he wanted to make the first one (god) inferior to him and himself (Satan) to be the first one (“god”). That is why – again according to Christian sect – god took away all beauty Satan had as former angel so that he became as ugly as Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ"), the sin or most of the Christians. Satan or Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and most Christians became those miscarriages of nature because they are such of mind and morals. I.e. according to the „tenets“ of their own, Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and his negative selection of fellow desperadoes want to accomplish the the program of Satan praising all the evil as "good" (theives' cant: "salt of the earth" etc.) and to wage war on any greatness these impostors do not have, in particular, by foul play (perfidy and criminality)!
Everybody is measured by the measure he defines for himself. Therefore, it is no disgrace having turned out badly by nature or being disabled etc. On the contrary, it is to appreciate helping those ones needing assistance of others to master their hard lot. Nobody but brutes can enjoy seeing the homeless starving or freezing to death. However, it becomes ridiculous if those miserable ones want to pose as the ideal (model) for humans everybody has to strive for or even emulate. Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and his fellow Christian terrorists shrink from nothing in order to achieve that. That is what makes Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") and his fellow desperadoes as well ridiculous as felonious and atrocious, i.e the top threat for human civilization.
In Christian sect it is only about the hatred and avenge of those that turned out badly on those that turned out better by nature. Moreover, in order to do that, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") realized that one needs „morals“ and an own sect-made “god” tailored to those needs of evil, fiendishness, crimes and abominations. That is what Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") is providing to those dastards. Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") recognized that these desperadoes (thieves' cant: "Christians") also need criminal “morals” canting each whatever atrocity, terror and barbarity so that they can unleash their depravity and criminality from the bottom of their evil heart, to the full. Exactly, for that he provides “Glad Tidings”, of course, for being addressed and worshiped as "god" , in return...! Nothing is free of charge, at least, among desperadoes! So, in Christian sect Satan achieved to become worshiped as the “god” and evil and depravity the reputation of the “good”, "saint" and "martyrdom for the truths" etc…
Nietzsche only mentions the failures of Germans of the last Millennium. He does not argue why the Germans behave that way. Since I lived in Germany for many decades, I can say that the Germany easily become beasts because they are that soulless and paltry so that one can call them disable ones. The average German is a desperado already from his national mind. Being German means being desperado. Inasmuch a German is not typical German, he is no desperado and vice versa. For Germans, becoming adult inexpressively means death of the soul. As soul, here we understand the capability of sensitiveness and feelings. In General, the Germans are working like zombies or machines easily to program for anything, even for any barbarity. Furthermore, the poorer one’s soul is, the more there is lust for power as substitution for a dead soul. This makes the Germans often to be beasts. One just needs to hit the nerves of envy of a German in order to make him forget whatever he learned about culture and civilization. It belongs to that paltriness that the Germans delude themselves to be supermen and “country of the poets and thinkers”. I lived for many decades in Germany and I can assure that I did not encounter even one thinker but a lot of goofs, biological robots, clumsy oafs, ugly as well repulsive. Germans are the finest working biological automatons. As long as robots do not replace humans, the Germans will be admired by ignoramuses who do not know the mire they admire....
The fact that some of the significant European philosophers of the last centuries were Germans is not due to a conceited German superiority but stems from the religious split (of Protestants and Catholics) in Germany and the thus resulting competition between the two Christian denominations. However, this fact is not due to any (conceited) superiority of the Germans. Furthermore, the competition of Catholics and Protestants led to a third thing both do not intend: a certain latitude for science. I.e., the pope or any other Christian clergy could not eliminate a philosopher only by a nod – without the victim's awareness, whoever bumped him off…
Since about hundred years the Germans only play a part in philosophy by incident, if at all. Those are personages slipping through their grudging fellow Germans' fingers... E.g. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860) was a private scholar and thus did not depend on the mercy and envy of German clumsy oafs’ mediocrity. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 –1900) became professor of philology only by recommendation of a patron in Switzerland – that is not Germany! – for about ten years (1869 - 1879). Afterwards he left university and even worked as a private scholar. When he later tried to lecture at the university of Leipzig (Germany) the goofy clumsy oafs impeded him to do so. In addition, the only reasons those German clumsy oafs of professors had, was that they could not hold a candle to Nietzsche. They could not resist the opportunity to score off someone to whom they could not hold a candle... Finally, the applied Christianity, i.e. to impede any greatness these creeps n' crooks -- compared to Nietzsche -- did not have!
German goofiness is that far-reaching that even today German clumsy oafs at universities deny the excellence of philosophers like that one of Arthur Schopenhauer or Nietzsche. However, I never heard somebody drivelling that way, who was a patch on those belittled. Against the exaggerated opinion of the last or Germans that so arduously want to become the first, even the gods fight in vain.
It is a very Christian and German way of thinking that everything that differs, that is not the average, that is alien, is to destroy, exterminate and to annihilate. They do so because they feel inferior to it. Therefore, they fancy to "reestablish" their conceited "superiority" by erasing that what is superior to them.
The Nazis precisely were very, very Germans, in this sense. It is not to question if the Germans are Nazis still today. On the Contrary, it is to question if the Nazis were Germans. Nazism is only an aggravation of German and Christian traits. That what happened ever can repeat because the Germans’ nature never changed.
Nietzsche and the German (Nazi) riff-raff - don’t make me laugh!
Finally, let us repeat the charge Nietzsche brings against Christianity nobody ever worded better than he did:
“This eternal accusation against Christianity I shall write upon all walls, wherever walls are to be found--I have letters that even the blind will be able to see. . . . I call Christianity the one great curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct of revenge, for which no means are venomous enough, or secret, subterranean and small enough,--I call it the one immortal blemish upon the human race. . .” (Anti-Christ § 62)
Further information to this topic by Atrott’s Information Service
· The Gospel of Barnabas (a very intelligent debunking of Christian sect)
©2003, revised 2008 Hans Henning Atrott
For minutiae to this topic see: http://www.bare-jesus.net/e00.htm
German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) once couched it in the following way, verbatim: "Until now, one did not see: that those who in their own views are outstandingly favoured <the elected> at least could outdo the commonly honest man in which one can trust in business and needs. Quite the opposite, on the whole they hardly could bear comparsion with him.” Translation from the German by my own. German text: „Noch aber hat man nicht gesehen: daß jene, ihrer Meinung nach, außerordentlich Begünstigten <Auserwählten> es dem natürlichen ehrlichen Manne, auf den man im Umgange, in Geschäften und in Nöten vertrauen kann, im mindesten zuvortäten, daß sie vielmehr, im ganzen genommen, die Vergleichung mit diesem kaum aushalten dürften...“ Immanuel Kant, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, in: Immanuel Kant, Werke in zwölf Bänden. Band 8, Frankfurt am Main 1977, S. 879, elektonisch veröffentlicht auf: http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Kant,%20Immanuel/Die%20Religion%20innerhalb%20der%20Grenzen%20der%20blo%DFen%20Vernunft/Viertes%20St%FCck.%20Vom%20Dienst%20und%20Afterdienst%20unter%20der%20Herrschaft%20des%20guten%20Prinzips,%20oder%20von%20Religion%20und%20Pfaffentum/Allgemeine%20Anmerkung, letzter Aufruf: 13.5.2011
The Gospel of Philip, NHC II, 33, Translated by Wesley W. Isenberg, Sying 99, on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html
Gospel of Barnabas, As Edited and Translated by Lonsdale and Laura Ragg (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1907, published to the Web by Hans Henning Atrott, Chapter 35, auf http://www.bare-jesus.net/gospelofbarnabas/verbatim.htm , last call: 01/05/2007
The Gospel of Thomas, NHC II,2, Translated by Thomas O. Lambdin , Logion 71, on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html
Concerning Jesus‘ inferior outward appearance see: H. Atrott, What does Jesus look like, http://www.bare-jesus.net/e401.htm, last call 05/11/2011