Introduction, Part: 3

How the Christians concealed Jesus monkey-God's  Homosexuality even by Perjury

 

 

The "Love" Jesus "loved" his Accomplices

The Suicide of Jesus’ favorite Accomplice John

 

To John Jesus was smarmily polite,

He took his dick off with a knife!

That way, John's life was "sacrificied",

To Satan's Christ ending  up by suicide!

 

This file is also available as PDF,   zip or word.exe

 

 

Table of Contents:

1. Lying as a matter of course and the Christian foul mouths’ “lifestyle”

2. The suicide of Jesus’ favorite accomplice John - a sacrilege of Christian sect

 

 

 

1. Lying as a matter of course and the Christian foul mouths’ lifestyle

 

        Well, if here one reads something quite different with that what those "Saints of The Latter Days“ dictate others in schools, other facilities of brainwashing, media etc. what the Christian barbarians accomplished by millions most abominable murders, then this is due to the fact that lying, hypocrisy and deceiving are very matters of course to Christian barbarians. Those who make use of "god" to  promote their advantage, their selfishness even by murders and other barbarities make use of lies and deception, anyway. To say something else means to pull the wool over the eyes of the duped. (Christian) hypocrisy solely is an especial high degree of lying, namely, lying as (Christian) lifestyle and (Christian) habit! Therefore, we attain completely reverse evidences than Western people get to know and from the Christian foul mouths. Let us demonstrate this by two examples:

 

       Right now, we can stick to the already – in the first part of this introduction -- mentioned Clement of Alexandria and his early Christian accomplice – a certain Theodore. Now, there are two early Christian foul mouths in private, Clement -- the well-known sect's "father" and the other Christian that is called Theodore -- never supposing that their letter will become accessible to the public after more than 1700 years.  Therefore, they are speaking straight from the shoulder and not the usual Christian way that shall blind the slaves. 


Click on the picture  


        Now, they think they can show their true faces and selves. We already quoted Clemens of Alexandria that Christian foul mouths cannot say all truths to their slaves. Before, we were interested in this quotation because it also debunks the anti-democratic fundamental mind of Christianity; here however, it is significant regarding another context. That is why we want to recall it here, again. Clement advises his fellow Christian slaveholder Theodore:

 

 

"For not all true things are to be said to all men. [i]

 

      

      Thus it is confirmed that there were always two „truths " in Christianity, one for the slaveholders, which are the deceivers (brainwashers) and the other ones for the slaves, the deceived (brainwashed ones).  That is the first principle of all deception. Deceit does not work without concealment and lies. Only swindle is in need of lies -- not the truths.  Lying and deceiving is the soul of all crime and Christendo(o)m.   


Christianity the attempt at the perfect crime

Christians while accomplishing their "love": "Jesus came to crucify the world" (The Gospel of Philip). Who is worse - the Nazis or the Christians?




      The second example for lying as a very matter of course to Christian foul mouths is Paul – mostly regarded as the most important Christian next to Jesus:

 

 

 

Ro 3:7-8 RSV 

7 But if through my falsehood God's truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner?

8 And why not do evil that good may come? --as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just.

 

 

       Note carefully: It is not only what the adversaries but also the Christian foul mouths say about themselves: "Let's do evil...“  In addition, they did, do and will do so, so long as this sort of barbarians , viz, Christian foul mouths ever will exist! However, Paul also calls the truth slander. That means the truth is an insult for those barbarians (Christians).  That means, lying is a matter of course in a sect, where the closets are brimming  with   skeletons and where its proponents feign that its instigator died innocently and miserably just because of the truths and nothing but because of the truths - and not for making his lies and deceit to be reputed as truths etc.!

 

      Since we right now are demonstrating  Jesus' sexual misconduct, here we want to illustrate how very much Jesus’ perfidious schmucks  are right when saying that not all true things can be told to all, if the Christian want to continue benefiting from their lies and deceit.  The affair faking  "eunuch" Jesus had with his catamite Lazarus as it is described in the secret gospel of Mark was  -as already mentioned in the first part –  not a unique one and no exception.   Likely, Mark and Peter make fun of their “renouncing the world” faking horny “eunuch” Jesus "Christ" and deride their "god".

 

       Later, some early Christian foul mouths obviously recognized how  “big boss” (Jesus) was debunked that way and therefore removed the story about the amorous tête-à-tête both catamites (Jesus and Lazarus) had when talking about the “realm of heaven” all over the night, while scantly dressed… Misshapen Jesus provided that "realm" of hell for his catamites in a quite barbaric way, namely, by hypnotizing his victims to  get them subservient for his (gay) sexual desires and pleasures.  Hence, it is not to contest that Jesus undoubtedly had a hypnotic ability -- the Christian foul mouths falsely called a divine one and its products they evenly falsely call miracles. To Lazarus (according to "Secret Gospel of Mark") he obviously did not apply hypnosis because Lazarus was gay by nature.  Quite different with that is Jesus’ sexual assault on John as it is reported in the “Acts of John”.  There, we demonstrated that John complained of Jesus having cut off something of him (John) that made his (John's) soul ill. However, that was the topic in the second part of this introduction.

 

 

2. The suicide of Jesus’ favorite accomplice John -  or how John scored reproaches to Jesus before dying

 

To John Jesus was smarmily polite,

He took is dick off with a knife!

 

    In the Christian (barbaric) sect, hardly anything is more banned but suicide. For Christian barbarians suicide is a sacrilege like sexuality is one. For both they lack any reasonable argument.  They are hatred and vengeance incarnate on those that turned out better by nature or god. How should the Christian predators keep their slaves under control and continue tormenting them, if the slaves can escape from their slavery and tortures  by suicide? The more inhuman a society is the more suicide is tabooed.     

      To murder others, to burn them alive or to expose them to the most abominable tortures, bipeds ever could fabricate, is no problem to Christian barbarians. Hardly the couple Ananias and Saphira of the early Christian community had not delivered all their money to the new greedy Christian sect and their "Saints of The Latter Days", when they became assassinated by Peter (rock on which this barbarity is built...) with the barbarian "god’s" help as those rascals claim that have the cheek to pass off as the "god" as an accomplice  of their murders, atrocities and beastliness:

 

 

Ac 5:1-13 RSV

1 ¶ But a man named Ananias with his wife Sapphira sold a piece of property,

 2  and with his wife's knowledge he kept back some of the proceeds, and brought only a part and laid it at the apostles' feet.

 3  But Peter said, "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and to keep back part of the proceeds of the land?

 4  While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? How is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God."

 5  When Ananias heard these words, he fell down and died. And great fear came upon all who heard of it.

 6  The young men rose and wrapped him up and carried him out and buried him.

 7  After an interval of about three hours his wife came in, not knowing what had happened.

 8  And Peter said to her, "Tell me whether you sold the land for so much." And she said, "Yes, for so much."

 9  But Peter said to her, "How is it that you have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? Hark, the feet of those that have buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out."

 10 Immediately she fell down at his feet and died. When the young men came in they found her dead, and they carried her out and buried her beside her husband.

 11 And great fear came upon the whole church, and upon all who heard of these things.

  

 

 

       No problem for Christian barbarians and their homemade (fellow barbarian) faking "god" to send somebody to kingdom come.  Never,  blame the Christian foul mouths for faking  prophecies! Each prophecy happened, that those sorcerers and deceivers could fulfill themselves -- like Peter fulfills the prophecy of his own that the wife will be carried out as a corpse like the one of   her husband just was carried to the grave...  Peter knows what he is going to accomplish and so he "divinely" can foretell it...   

       The wife of the murdered one is told by the Christian barbarian: Behold the feet of those carried out the corpse of  your husband, and they will immediately carry out your corpse. Aren’t Christian murders able to foretell precisely…? So, you can "trust" in all the Christian foul mouths' foretelling of "doomsday",  "downfall of the Earth", "hell" and "heaven"   - you can "believe" in all those tortures you getting brainwashed to believe  to  become their servile slave!  

      Again, murder is no problem to Christian barbarians but the one thing, they are unable to overcome that is suicide.  Rather they would clash, smash, bash and slay everybody or even set fire to our whole planet than allowing their slaves the freedom of choice of death. As Peter was helped by Jesus -- his barbaric homemade deceiving “god”  -- when murdering the mentioned couple each Christian will be assisted by idol Jesus when murdering the Jews in concentrations camps or his neighbor right down the corner that has more money than he or she has and is not willing to deliver all he or she has to the conceited “Saints of The Latter Days”…    

       However, this instruction that a good Christian always murders but never commits suicide is also only one for the slaves but not for the slaveholders according to the already mentioned Latin proverb: Quod licet Iovi non licet bovi (what is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the cattle).  Of course,  Christian predators have the  freedom of choosing death, i.e., of committing suicide, as we are now going to produce evidence by the example of John, Jesus’ favorite accomplice.  

      Jesus’ already mentioned catamite John -- among Christian foul mouths known as Jesus' favorite accomplice -- quite obviously has died a self-determined death. This means that John committed suicide.

       Before dying, John scores  a very debunking accusation to  Jesus. Facing death, he has nothing to lose and nothing to gain any more what is making his indictment against Jesus very credible.   That speech of John unveils Jesus as sexual offender. It was the topic in our previous part.  

However, now to John’s suicide: John instructs a (Christian) helper -- a certain Verus -- to hire two men with shovels and baskets.

 

 

 

After that he (John) said unto Verus: Take with thee some two men, with baskets and shovels, and follow me. And Verus without delay did as he was bidden by John the servant of God.”[ii]

 

   

      With these three men and their tools, John leaves the house he just was sojourning and the city.  When arriving at the tomb of an already deceased Christian, he orders  the three “children“ to dig a grave.  

 

    

“The blessed John therefore went out of the house and walked forth of the gates, having told the more part to depart from him. And when he was come to the tomb of a certain brother of ours he said to the young men: Dig, my children.”[iii]

 

 

     They even are still instructed to dig the grave deeper than they wanted to do:

 

“And they dug and he was instant with them yet more, saying: Let the trench be deeper.”[iv]

 

 

       Now John drops his clothes into the trench, he obviously gives himself the Catholic  extreme unction and lays himself down into the grave – after having said a short good bye (“peace with you”) to those he is departing from, he   dies as scheduled.

 

 

“And having sealed himself in every part (extreme unction?), he stood and said: Thou art with me, O Lord Jesus "Christ" : and laid himself down in the trench where he had strown his garments: and having said unto us: Peace be with you, brethren, he gave up his spirit rejoicing.”[v]

 

 

       That here-described "wonder" of dying is nothing but a classic suicide.  It is not difficult to take a drug without the bystanders’ notice. John wants to die. John arranges a group of men digging a grave for him.   He gives himself the extreme unction. He says good-bye  (“peace with you”) to the bystanders, lays himself down into the grave and dies.

 So, what is the problem that this should be no suicide? Because he does not show the drug he was going to take or had already taken or the writers do not mention it? Well, it is not unusual for early Christian foul mouths to withhold the tools of killing, for example, in the Acts of the Apostles, chapter 5, regarding the case of  Ananias and Saphira as already quoted. There is also left the sword or knife Peter  slew or  stabbed the ones to  send both to kingdom come... Evenly there, it is only reported that the two -- who did not satisfy Peter’s and the early church’s greediness -- gave up their ghosts. 

Since the Christian foul mouths have a homemade "god" (Jesus) of their own, death to themselves and to their adversaries or enemies occurs always as desired. However, for such accomplishments they always care themselves… Regarding the case of Ananias and Saphira it is also concealed how murdered  Peter – e.g., by what exact kind of weapon and action – perpetrated those  “deliverances of their lives”…   Only the result matters to the Christian foul mouths, not the embarrassing and barbaric way and mind how it became accomplished! The stuntman on the cross has forgiven all the Christian foul mouths’ bestiality and atrocities -- already before they committed them…  So, do not worry…! 

    None of the twelve accomplices of the Jesus gang died naturally. Eleven died by execution of death penalty for most abominable outrages. Moreover, the only one that was not executed died by self-deliverance -- driven to commit suicide by misshapen cripple Jesus "Christ" , who sexually abused, physically and psychically crippled him - as Jesus "Christ" himself is a cripple. In addition, John was not the only one the venom of Jesus had crippled, driven to commit suicide or even killed...  

Jesus bragged about the  "love" he and his perfidious schmucks   "loved" one another. However, the   "love" they "loved" one another was a love-hate relationship.  Exactly John witnesses that. Even John as well   hated as "loved" Jesus. He as all the other infamous schmucks  "loved" him because of all the advantages resulting from sorcery and deceit and hated him because of the infamy of his trait and his deception.

 

 

 

PREVIOUS | HOME  | TABLE OF CONTENTS| NEWS THE CROSS DECEPTION | CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRISTWHAT DID JESUS LOOK LIKE? | THE (STOLEN) STAR OF BETHLEHEM | APHORISM | MY STUFF |NEXT |

© 1998 - 2003 

HANS HENNING ATROTT -  All rights reserved.- Reproduction only for private use and/or purposes of studying and archiving by research and/or library institutes - otherwise without permission strictly prohibited. This site is still under construction.

 

 

Annotation:


[i] The Secret Gospel of Mark, THE GNOSTIC SOCIETY LIBRARY, Gnostic Scriptures and Fragments, Last call: 06/14/2008 http://www.gnosis.org//library/secm.htm     

[ii] ACTS OF JOHN, From "The Apocryphal New Testament", M.R. James-Translation and Notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924, Scanned and Edited by Joshua Williams, Northwest Nazarene College, 1995, § 111, on: http://web.archive.org/web/20041220220424/http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/noncanon/acts/actjohn.htm, last call 08/11/2013,

[iii] ibid.

[iv] The Acts of John, ibid., § 115