Introduction, Part: 1

How the Christians concealed Jesus monkey-God's  Homosexuality even by Perjury

"Eunuch" Jesus Caught with Naked Man in The Act

This file is also available as PDF, ZIP or WORD.EXE and in German and Arabic

Revised version of Summer 2007

Prefatory note:

Here, it is not about to praise or denigrate homosexuality. Here, it is about an impressive example, how

· those hypocrites -- that allegedly do sacrifice themselves for their next  – are used to lying, deceiving and leading others up the garden path -

· the Christian foul mouths are used to putting yokes on others about which they just laugh up their sleeves, in private –

· Jesus lied when alleging “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Mt 28:18), because he even was unable to change then views on homosexuality as an abomination in view of god according to Le 18:22. This means that homosexual, alleged “god's son”, in truth even is an anathema to god. If this view is right or wrong is irrelevant. Relevant is what the Bible says, i.e., the scripture he refers to sham evidence of the “humble” and “modest” claims about himself. According to this evidence, he is an anathema, i.e., miscarriage, to god, already because of his homosexuality but also because he hangs on a cross (see: De 21:23).

· Jesus "Christ" , who gladly wants to associate as peer to  god, in truth is an abomination to god like Satan is one? If so, then Christians are an anathema to god, too! God does not want and love abominations and miscarriages. However, infamous Christian foul mouths are used to shamming so and the one, who is called Satan by the Christian foul mouths… Hereby, both (the Christian foul mouths and Satan) promote the benefit and selfishness of their own. This sheds light on Christian sect’s doctrines and criminal history -

· the early Christian foul mouths knew  that the purported evidence (the Jews’ Bible) does not turn out Jesus as “god’s son” or “Messiah” but debunks him as an abomination   (see: Le 18:22) and an anathema to  god (see: Gal 3:13). So, the early Christian sinners decided to save their deceptive faith,viz, organized crime by committing more crimes including the crimes of perjury to deny Jesus’ homosexuality.  Later, the Christian foul mouths even did not refrain from murder to do so.

· If Jesus "Christ" even would have had a spark of decency he would have started fighting to change those wrong and inhumane views about  homosexuality -- which he practiced and enjoyed! - of his time instead of shamming a eunuch. This, he could have done quite according to this swanky slogan: (Christian desperadoes’) faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and inhumane views about homosexuality, anyway. It seems that Jesus lacked this grain of mustard seed of faith, so he could not change the common belief about homosexuality among his contemporaries and he finally contented with practicing  homosexuality secretly rather than swimming against a current in an already troubled waters!

· Jesus wants to be „god“ and „modest“? Oh yes, I already heard about it. My word! One never knows what things folks sometimes fancy to be...! My goodness, who on earth and in heaven wants to be “god”? For instance, Satan – the same anathema (see: De 21:23) the same deformity (see: here part e401!) and abomination (see: Le 18:22) to god as Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" )!

     Clement of Alexandria, a prominent early Christian -- so called "church father"  (150 - 215 C.E.) -- writes to a fellow early Christian at the end of 2nd century – both surely never dreamt of such a thing that once their letter  would become public, after many centuries: 

“... should one concede that the secret Gospel is by Mark, but should even deny it on oath."[1]

     Whoever defends his „faith“ by the felony of perjury or even does it by murder?     Here, truth is called falsification -- and thus indirectly falsification is called truth. Truths are to deny by perjury according to the views of (early) Christian foul mouths, too.  Later they added further still more dreadful weapons but perjury to succeed. This notion of "truth" -- the early Christian foul mouths confirm in private -- is what sincere people accused Christian sect from its very outset.

     My word, one never knows how easily Christian sect gets “apocryphal” – that means false – chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels")! A little bit of truth, and hey presto a gospel becomes non-authentic, even by perjury… That is why only four of 72 chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") are regarded as genuine in Christian sects. No other “religions” is that “persecuted by “forgeries” all over!

     It is about a sect, a “religion” that alleges even to die for the truths. Do they die for the truths or for the purpose that their lies -- which promise extraordinary advantages to them -- are reputed to be the truths?  Here in private, they confess even to die for a perjury. Why did the early Christian foul mouths even conspire to forswear and thus made up their mind to deny even perjuring that the secret chronicle of Mark was written by the well-known gospel-writer Mark? 

   Here are not only gay amorous adventures of Jesus "Christ", at stake.  It is about debunking Jesus "Christ" as an abomination to god by the scripture to which  he refers to fake (spurious) evidence for all his presumptuous claims and demands, for instance,  being the topmost slaveholder of humankind (what indeed is the meaning of his terms like „son of god“,  „son of man“ or "god").

It is a common error of today  that Ben-Pandera and his early henchmen were people living as ascetics and being chastely.

Already the Christian chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") leak something else on the faking "martyr of the truths":

Mt 11:19 NRSV

19 the Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds."

Lu 7:34 NRSV

34 the Son of Man has come eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look, a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’

If on those conditions somebody is deemed to be ascetic and chaste, it either is due to deception or to deficiencies , e.g. of money or to lack of sexual attractiveness, so-to-speak due to a bad sexual market value. For the latter reasons many Christians resort to chastity pretending their shortcomings as "excellence" to the goofs n' fools stooping to all shrews spoofs...

 Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (nickname: Jesus "Christ")  claims to be Messiah (Greek: Christos) like the Jewish prophets predicted and designed him. However, this scripture (Bible, “Old Testament”) provides evidence to the contrary. Hence, if necessary, everything the Christian foul mouths are used to denying by the felony of perjury:

Le 18:22 RSV

22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

That is       Christian sect’s “god” Jesus "Christ" , instead of being “lamb of god that carries the sins of the world on the cross” in truth an abomination onto god? 

And so his Christian foul mouths, instead of “god’s children”, “god’s chosen ones”, “salt of the earth”, “light of the world” abominations onto god, i.e., a sect of infamy as reason turns them out by criminal history of their sect? The Bible both Jesus and the Christian foul mouths desire refer condemns the Christian foul mouths’ sect’s god (Jesus) even still tougher:

Le 20:13 ASV

13 And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Jesus’ homosexuality turns out his allegations of suffering „as god’s lamb for the sins of the world on the cross“ as fiddlesticks by the Bible as well as by reason. Evenly by reason, it is beyond comprehension how Jesus ever could have atoned the mass murder of the holocaust committed by Christian Germans on the Jews that did not exist when Jesus "Christ" was executed death penalty.  Jesus "Christ" was not convicted death penalty to atone the sins of the world but because of failing to usurp the Jewish crown (“King of Jews”). Perhaps, in that way that such easy faked expiation instigates to perpetrate such outrages and barbarities, more easily and without scruples! In truth, that is one reason why the Christian foul mouths are very interested in remission of sins by a “god” they made themselves, for the advantage and selfishness of their own!

Of course one can consider the Bible’s punishment of homosexuality to be inhuman.

Of course death penalty is to reject.

· However, here is it to evaluate what Jesus "Christ" passes off as the “evidence” for all his claims and demands, e.g., being “Co-god”,”lamb of god” etc. According to his (spurious) evidence (“Old Testament”) Jesus is no “son of god” or “lamb of god” but an abomination onto god – and not only an abomination onto god but also one, that even deserves death penalty. Nobody suffers innocent death penalty on the cross that deserves death penalty. That is what the (spurious) evidence is saying, by which Jesus and the Christian foul mouths want to trick reason. That is why early Christian Clement of Alexandria instigates to deny Jesus’ homosexuality even by perjury.

· Here, it is to provide evidence that the (spurious) evidence (Bible of the Jews) rejects and condemns Jesus and the Christian foul mouths not less than reason does.

· It is to provide evidence that the proofs Jesus pretends for the advantage of his own, i.e., that everything he claims to be is predicted and designed in the Bible (“Old Testament”), e.g., being “Messiah”, “god’s son”, “lamb of god” at best demonstrates that he is Satan’s Messiah, Satan’s son and Satan’s lamb suffering that “innocent” like Satan suffers “innocently”… That evidence (“Old Testament” turns out Christian sect as a community, in which Satan accomplished being worship as “god”. And that is what we are demonstrating here.

· However, here it is not about how moral Commandments or laws generally are to evaluate. Concerning this question I like to confine myself to my judgment that overall, they are by far better as the Christian ones and not to compare with them. That is why the Christian foul mouths cannot do without the Bible of the Jews (“Old Testament”), even if it debunks them as hideous and atrocious liars, deceivers and abominations onto god worth punishing death penalty. However, its views about homosexuality are not to approve.

     If one considers the Christian foul mouths’ outrages and barbarities that are past comprehension, then nobody can deem the Bible’s indirect condemnation of Jesus and the Christian foul mouths to be too harsh. On the contrary, it is to reproach that one followed Jesus and the Christian foul mouths, instead of god’s word, since especially Jesus and the Christian foul mouths evenly acknowledge that scripture as god’s word.

Now, we realize, why Clement of Alexandra recommends his perfidious schmucks even to perpetrate perjury, if Jesus’ homosexuality is brought up. Because death penalty of Jesus "Christ" providing evidence of a felon and death penalty convict further cannot be canted, like for instance, passed off as “suffering for the sins of the world as god’s innocent lamb”. Already Jesus’ homosexuality unmasks the Christian foul mouths’ god sufficiently as liar and deceiver.

Hence, according to that “god's word”, the alleged “son of god” -- for whom the Christian foul mouths burnt millions of individuals alive – Jesus is not only a swindler but a horror to god worth punishing death penalty... That is what the Bible, i.e., the so-called “evidence”, Jesus and the Christian foul mouths refer says.

Jesus "Christ" – innocent lamb of god? Ah, ah, ha! Do not make me laugh! Homosexuality is by far not the only reason for Jesus deserves death penalty according to that (spurious) evidence (“Old Testament”) he and his perfidious schmucks (Christians) refer to. That is what we are going to produce evidence in this treatise.

     Here, it is about the sexual wantonness of Jesus and his gang. They preach chastity to others. The boss of the gang who later is lifted to their "god" even fakes having castrated himself for the "realm of heaven" -- likewise his warriors ("disciples"). Until the present day, the slaves of that slave holder feel very embarrassing about it. 

Mt 19:12 RSV 

12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it.

    The monkey-god is playing the eunuch...! You never know what the monkey-god has to suffer...! He even has to play the eunuch...! This is the trick how the last are used to canting their inferiority as "superiority". Since the last do not want to admit their inferiority they lie their deficiencies and shortcomings as "excellence" to dupe their fellow human beings. An early Christian "gospel" Christian sect wanted to destroy forever but finally failed to do so leaks the reverse of Ben-Pandera (nickname: Jesus "Christ").

In the suppressed "Gospel of Thomas" -- the Christian shysters and predators wanted to destroy forever -- divulges this matter still a little bit clearer.

Jesus said to them, "If you fast, you will give rise to sin for yourselves; and if you pray, you will be condemned; and if you give alms, you will do harm to your spirits.[2]

Isn't Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") a monkey-god, isn't he..? Oh yeah, Christians do not forget that not only your alms but also your prayers to your monkey-god Ben-Pandera the latter attributes to your goofiness, imbecility or insanity...! And you, Christians, cannot stop but harming your "spirits"... Here, indirectly Ben-Pandera (nickname: Jesus "Christ") calls Christian monasteries as bedlams and lunatic asylums. Christians, hand on heart, is not he right...? So, do not  always upbraid Ben-Pandera for being a liar and deceiver...!

Due to their falsehood, in particular, perfidy, Jesus and his gang feign having castrated themselves for the "sake of the kingdom of heaven. However, the truth is that neither big boss (Jesus) nor his perfidious schmucks ("disciples") have castrated themselves but all hypocritically indulge sexual pleasure, often, indeed shameful ones.  Christian miscarriage of nature and mind, Shaul Paul wails about the behavior of his fellow Christian desperadoes he declared to be "discharged from the law" (Ro 7:6).

1Co 5:1 ¶NRSV

1 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you (Christians), and of a kind that is not found even among pagans; for a man is living with his father’s wife.

 This is the behavior of people feeling "discharged from the law" (Ro 7:6)...! Did not monkey-god Ben-Pandera free his fellow desperadoes and henchmen from the law (see: Ro 10:4)...? So, do not always chide Ben-Pandera (nickname: Jesus "Christ") for being only the great pretender (of Satan's gender)...! As we are going to demonstrate below, it is not reported that Ben-Pandera laid with his mother in bed but enjoyed as nacked man another nacked man... The former is not reported...

Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant:  Jesus "Christ") preach chastity according the Latin proverb: Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi, i.e., that what is allowed to (the god) Jupiter is not in the least allowed to the cattle. Here, it is not about for or against sexuality or homosexuality. Here it is about hypocrisy, lies, deceit and malice. And here, sexuality or homosexuality models to what extend depraved Christian foul mouths lead others up the garden path. 

     The boss (Jesus) is homosexual and indulges that kind of pleasure especially with his gay friend Lazarus. He wants to interdict that what he is used to enjoying to others by pompously feigned "morals" just in order have the upper hand of his slaves or conditioned sheep dogs. His insidious schmucks ("disciples") are heterosexual and mutually grudge their concubines. Since each of them has skeletons in his closet, they mutually conceal for the advantage of all. Only by chance, or by envy or vindictiveness the facts indirectly come to light.  So very typically of Christian, for example, Paul sees too much arrows of venom and jealousy directed at him by his insidious Christian schmucks because of the women he takes along with him, and thus he feels compelled to defend himself:

1 Co 9:4-5 RSV

4 Do we not have the right to our food and drink?

5 Do we not have the right to be accompanied by a wife, as the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?

     They torment their stupid addled-brained slaves and/or simpletons by chastity. However, for them sex is a matter of course like food and drinking. Each of them - including Peter - has its concubines. And Jesus has his catamites as we are going to produce evidence now. They preach asceticism. They preach renouncing the world; however they do not forgo any pleasure that is offered to them. They poison pleasures to others just because of their grudge and envy that other shall not do better than they do -- those "Saints of the Latter Days" - that turned out badly by nature or even "god".  

     That is the "mystery" why others should forgo the pleasure they can have, those dark "Saints of the Latter Days'" do not reject if offered to them...  And always there are enough morons being taken in by those malicious and envious liars and deceivers. Those "renouncing eunuchs" used to booze, guzzle and fuck unrestrainedly like barbarians are used to doing so. They were only restricted by the poor opportunities that happen to miserable creatures, however not by their desires and "morals". And their instigator (Jesus) is the worst of all. He even depravedly uses his hypnotic abilities to make heterosexuals subservient homosexual slaves to himself - and in one case he will drive one of his disciples (John) to commit suicide. This we are going to prove now -- almost 2000 years ago when those abominations happened.

     Paul asks: Why do you grudge my sexual pleasures while being presumptuous taking the same liberties? And just by those mutual jealousies we get to know what those "Saints of The Latter Days" really are used to indulging... Indeed, most of his insidious schmucks finally achieved those women and sexual pleasure by "mastering" lies, fraud, deceit and hypocrisy what obviously impressed some depraved Christian female wantons. 

      However, not only because of grudge but also because of derision and disdain the disciples of the Christian foul mouths' Christ (Jesus) "extended" to their super-eunuch, "god”, "god's son" and catamite ("All authority is given to me in heaven and on Earth", " heaven and Earth will pass by but not my words..."), we still are able to experience what concealed was going on in that Jesus' gang. His own family that should had experienced his swindled "wonders" deem him to be nuts (see Mark 3:21; Luke 8:19-20; Matthew 12:46-50; John 7:1-9, especially verse 5) and his perfidious schmucks ("disciples") jeered at him because of his dwarfish deformity and being a gay (faking a eunuch) wanton. 

       The boss (Jesus) was used to indulging males and in one case (his disciple John) we are able to produce evidence that he psychically raped that male to be sexually subservient to him. Even, here once again, we presumably get to know only because of envy and vindictiveness what had happened among those "Saints -- or better: Demons -- of The Latter Days". Jesus and his disciples were connected by a love-hate relationship with one another.   When hatred prevailed, they were used to debunking one another.     

     But let us proceed systematically.

      It is the year 1958 C.E... Scene is a monastery called “Mar Saba” southeast from Jerusalem. A US-American doctoral candidate is rummaging around old papers that are already stored for centuries in this convent. He shall catalogue them. Suddenly he finds three pages fixed in a book, which obviously are no part of that one he is holding in his hands.  "To Theodore” is the address of this letter. The young scientist has a foreboding having made a unique find of far reaching consequences. He takes the tree pages along home to the USA and shows them to his professor. The professor also evenly and immediately grasps the significance   of that discovery and expresses himself in a sense like this one: God knows what you have brought along. However, let us discuss some notes before continuing that exciting discovery that Christian authorities now anxiously are trying to pass over in silence.

     If one watches the courtship the Christian foul mouths are doing, then one can get the impression that Christendom is about a worldwide organization that again and again is persecuted by other human beings, in fact just because it says nothing else but truths. The Christian foul mouths pose as if they are absolutely guileless, harmless and apart from alleged or putative truths they just have" charity" in their mind by what they understand helping the sick and the handicapped. That is what they are used to making belief until the present day. So to speak, because they allegedly tell the truths those Christian folks apparently is persecuted. The Christian foul mouths try to give the impression: Well, here it is not about a sect of perpetrators but one of victims.

     Nowhere a Christian sect without cults of alleged martyrs like nowhere Roman Catholics or Orthodox Christians without ostensible apparitions of Mary! And nowhere even one monument for the victims of Christian atrocities that indeed are past comprehension...! Already their "prophet“ Yehoshua  (Jesus) who is passed off as a divine person by them allegedly was executed  death penalty merely because of the alleged severe infirmity of the traits of his Jewish competitors -- as the Christian foul mouths eagerly try making the world believing.

     However, on a closer inspection, the matter looks to be quite different with  that. It is conspicuous that:

1.) Truths mean an egregious menace for Christian sect, although it purports to suffer and even to die for them. The own "prophet" who is not only worshiped as somebody enunciating "god’s" word -- as in Judaism or Islam prophets are worshiped -- but as "god" or an associate of the "god" -- passes the following treacherous verdict on his own henchmen and henchwomen:

Joh 16:12 RSV

I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. 

     That doesn't match: A sect that purports shedding its blood and allegedly being determined to suffer and even to die for the truths are attested by the  prophet or even god (slaveholder) of its own not  being able to bear truths at all and therefore, yes,  even being spared  from them. My word, imagine those “lovers” of truths…! In effect, truths turn out to be a scandal for the adherents of this sect. More over, this already is debunked in the hour zero of the existence of this sect and by the topmost position they have -- that means by their "god" himself. We are going to produce evidence  that:

· Truths always were the utmost menace hat could ever happen to this sect already from the very outset. 

· The "prophet" or "god" of the Christian foul mouths indeed said what he now refused to tell  his crowd.

· That his closest perfidious schmucks ("disciples") -- getting into difficulties -- barely could suppress the scandal that is named: Truths! 

      Furthermore, it is conspicuous that Christian sect alleges to be persecuted like no other organization is persecuted in the world. However, those Christian claims of alleged prosecution on the one hand, and the Christian foul mouths' bestiality, atrocities and abominations on the other hand, are conspicuously and deliberately quite in a reciprocal relationship. Actually, this Christian sect tortures, torments, plagues, agonizes and assassinates its dissidents, rivals and competitors as no other sect, well, any other organized crime  of human beings ever doesn't do that much. Christian sect is always faking the reverse of that what it really is and does on the one hand, and what it really is and means mischief on the other hand.

      However, let's go back to Clement's letter. This mentioned letter is a writing of an early Christian to another fellow. It is a letter, in which two early Christian foul mouths are chewing over how to muzzle a dissident or competitor who knows too much about gay Jesus. It throws light in the dark or in the execrable manner, by which the much-vaunted early Christian foul mouths proceeded to pull the wool over the eyes of their  conspecifics. Both Christian foul mouths (Clement and Theodore) have an enormous problem: How to do away with the truth? This means, to know how to do it and/or how far one can go setting oneself such a target? 

     It is about an undisclosed second gospel of Mark beside that one that became part of the Christian foul mouths’ “New Testament". At that time and  like today hardly a Christian knew respectively knows something about the strictly secret kept (second) gospel of Mark that was concealed  so much that it finally got lost -- presumably, when the large majority of the Egyptian population elevated themselves leaving  Christian sect and all its deceit. 

Let’s go back two millennia that means to outset of Christian sect. Again and again sects split from Christian sect. On the on hand, some Christian new sects do not want to be confronted with „Pagan“ religions that harshly, as the upper Christian swineherds always instigate to hate them and on the other hand, they do not want that sexual repression the  other  Christian swineherds are imposing. Already in „John’s revelation“ Jesus loses control of himself, if it is about the sect of the “fornication” of Nicolaitanes:

Re 2:6 RSV
6 Yet this you have, you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I (Jesus) also hate.

Jesus,  does not lose self-control? Then, let’s compare:

Lu 6,27 ASV

27 Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you

     My word, what a paragon of hypocrisy and „love“ towards his enemies! However, here this is less our topic. Even the just founded Christian community in Pergamos gets its comeuppance, because its ideas are close to those ones of the Nicolaitans (see: Re 20:12). Completely Jesus loses self-control if it is about the sect of prophetess Jezebel:

Re  2:20 RSV

20  But I (Jesus) have this against you, that you tolerate the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and beguiling my servants to practice immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols.

Quod licet Iovi not licet bovi, i.e., that what is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the cattle, or: That what is allowed to Christian foul mouths slaveholders is not allowed to Christian slaves…

     Jesus being fobbed off as standing for „love“ and „mercifulness“ even unable to hurt a fly on the Christian deceit’s victims, announces crucifixion (death penalty) on his enemies:

Re 2:22-23 RSV

22  Behold, I (Jesus)  will throw her on a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her doings;

23  and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches shall know that I am he who searches mind and heart (even by infanticide and other murders!)...

     Where is the Father God as regards this all?..... What is his stance about all these threats?........ Did he give it all to Jesus to do whatever he likes?!!!..... If he can do so?!!!..... And can revenge so badly; why he did not defend himself or revenge the people who crucified or killed him?!!!...... Just threatening in words while he is far away and out of reach, while in the time of action (kicking, spitting at, whipping, beating and finally crucifixion to death!), there is no action nor even words! 

     The “mercy” and “love” of Jesus "Christ" and his perfidious schmucks (Christians) are tribulations on their rival. Since, Christians lose any fair competition they perfidiously feign the tribulations and crimes they want to inflict on others as "love" of their neighbor. Christians even do not refrain from perfidy as feigns their crimes on their rivals as "love of their enemies". No wonder that those objectifications of perfidy, i.e. perfidy that has become human bodies, sham that foul mouth as “god’s word”.  Maybe, some day we will see in a movie how Jesus – completely touched by “brotherly love” -- throws her rival on a sickbed (imagine what happens then…!) and afterwards – still more touched by “love” and “mercifulness” – murders the children of his rival just because they are children of his. Oh yes, this is the one (“To him that smites thee on the one cheek offer also the other”, Lu 6:29) the Christian foul mouths palm off as “god of love“, “remission“, “meekness” and “mercifulness” on their victims of deception... Once inflamed with thirst for enslaving others and corresponding vindictiveness, Jesus stops at nothing. He even does not shrink from crucifying (murdering) a lot of children! My word, what a paragon of slaveholder! The same model as his sect! Like master, like man!

Early Christians did not regard "Eucharist" only as a ritual but often as a party followed by sexual orgies.  The author George William Foote and  Joseph Mazzini Wheeler write in the book "The Crimes of Christianity":

Tertullian, indeed, after becoming a Montanist, divulged the fact that in the Church which he had before so zealously defended the young men lay with their sisters in the Agape, and wallowed in wantonness and luxury. Such accusations were made by those who had been Christians themselves, in places as far apart as Lyons, Rome, and Asia Minor. Trials took place before competent tribunals, and the Christians were punished. When we know that the Agape were prohibited by several councils because of the scandals to which they gave rise, it is difficult to exonerate the early Christians from these grave charges. Much of the persecution to which they are alleged to have been subject by the best and wisest emperors, probably arose from these secret midnight meetings.[3]

Ben-Pandera and his instigation of Christian sect on the one hand, and sexuality on the other perform a bedlam and a hell of crimes. It is not off the mark to call Christian sects a heaven for sexual criminals. Today, we especially  experience those sexual criminals from their sexual abuse of children. As in ancient times sexual shameful madness (intercourse of sons with their mothers, brothers with their sisters etc.) were reported from all part of the then world where is organized crime in disguise of a religion was spread, we today in the same hear of sexual abuse of little children from all over the world. Christian rogues with frocks are the most professional group of sexual criminals but not only of those sorts of crimes. Sexual criminals come to light today, because Christian sects are unable to condition their prey (thieves' cant: "sheep") to keep quiet about this sort of their crimes.

Christian try keeping their mask working by firstly concealing, secondly contesting and thirdly prevaricating their crimes that their topmost impostor Ben-Pandera was "good" and only the Christians and the church purportedly "vitiate" him.  This is only a trick to keep criminality of Christianity in disguise of a religion working.