Chapter: 9, Part: 3 of 4

Miscellaneous - The Bible and the Christians' illicit annex of "authentic" and "apocryphal" chronicles ("gospels") Part: 3 of 4

"Authentic" and "apocryphal Gospels" Part: 3 of 4

The so-called apocryphal “Gospels” (Chronicles)

“God’s Word” as self-Service for Impostors in a Parrot’s Clothing

This file is also available as PDF, ZIP and WORD.EXE

As we expounded before, already the Christian notion of “gospel” is non-authentic, since Ben-Pandera (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ”) only conceived “moral” teachings as such and no biography (chronicle) of his life as such. Already from this fact, there is no difference like black and white or truths and lies regarding the so-called “authentic” and “non-authentic” chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”).

In contrast with later Christians' faking, early Christian sect did not know any normative chronicles, from the very outset.[1]   At least at the time of the “Canon Muratori” (about the year 200), features (standards) for chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) were fixed. 

In the year 1740, L. A. Muratori from the Bibliotheca Ambrosiana of Milan (Italy) detected a scripture containing a complete list of the canon of the „New Testament“ Catholic sect acknowledged as  "authentic" about the year 200. The first known Catholic canon therefore is called “Canon Muratori”. Here, the author inadvertently or deliberately reveals the already mentioned features making a scripture to be an “authentic” one in views Catholicism and for all later Christian sects: They shall contain the lies about:

· “birth,

· suffering,

· resurrection,

· how he associated with his disciples ,i.e., miracles,

· his twofold arrival, the first one despised in lowness having already occurred, then in the glory of royal authority, what is still to happen”[2] and

· will to power (Christians’ cant: potestas ligandi et solvendi).

The latter demand, of course, is concealed. Hereby, Christians changed the term of "gospel" as coined and used by Ben-Pandera. It is not to assume that he spoke about the first mention point (birth) and the following ones ("suffering" and "resurrection" from the dead after three days).  Those things were not contrived before Palm Sunday nor did those "happenings of salvation" take place before the mentioned day.  As we proved in another context, "vicarious atonement" and "vicarious suffering" are canting of the disgrace of a death penalty convict, with hindsight.  For instance, the first ever Christian Church Order (Didache) -- presumably from the year 50 C.E. -- knows nothing about that. It demonstrably does not know that Ben-Pandera gave his flesh and blood "for the sins of those, who believe in him" but warns of the "purifier" and teaches a quite different meaning of the Eucharist, as we already demonstrated in the precedent parts of this chapter... Therefore, there are two notions of "gospels" in Christianity, one of Ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") and one of Christian sect, respectively, that one of canonized chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") as described by the Canon Muratori.  Ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") completely is excused. He did not study "wise" Catholic "theology"...!

“Authentic” in later and today Christian sect is that what makes the human prey submitted and obeying to the Christian bigwigs and their lust for power! Early Christian slaveholders (Christians’ cant: “good shepherds”) only were interested in lies and deceits.  The early Christian bigwigs’ (Christians’ cant: “good shepherds’”) were busy to style Jesus (the death penalty convict) as a figure of misery to make the victims feel pity with their slaughterer:

“…for Jesus came to crucify the world.”[3]

Already for betraying the real goal behind the mask of "vicarious suffering" and "vicarious atonement" for those who fall for his trap addressing and worshiping him as god, the chronicle imputed to Philip (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of Philip“) is declared to be “apocryphal”. One cannot but repeat it again and again: In contrast with the drivel of Christian perfidiologians (Christians' cant: "theologians"),  even mistakes, errors and deceits, each of them, have their premises of possibilities and do not grow on trees. Christians are not out of the wood by calling a debunking matter "non-authentic". Even "non-authentic" matters have their premises of possibilities. This means: Christians, on the one hand, declare scriptures to be “non-authentic” even if they report genuine words of Ben-Pandera (agrapha). On the other hand,  they  declare sheer fabrications to be “authentic” only because they correspond to the just mentioned structure  of a scripture as pointed out in the Canon Muratori, i.e. to that what  they deem to be expedient to trap their victims. 

Imagine the crime the author of “The Gospel of Thomas” committed…  He presents only a collection of sayings, no sorcery, no declaration what the faking Messiah (Greek: Christos) or even “son of god” purportedly has to suffer for the depravity and perfidy of his, pardon, for the sins of his believers… More over, no account what Judas Iscariot, pardon, Jesus (the death penalty convict) had to suffer on the gallows or cross...  However, the most "abominable sin or crime" the author of "The Gospel of Thomas" perpetrated is that his "gospel" is in accordance with the notion of "gospel" Ben-Pandera coined, i.e. it does not correspond to the meaning of a "gospel" as chronicle Christians later contrived. Already this fact sufficiently demonstrates who really is "god" (the leader of Christian clergies, popes etc.) and who is only a dummy of "god" (Ben-Pandera), in Christianity.

Oh my god, you never know what Christians have to “suffer”, even from Balaam’s (villain’s) chronicle (Sanhedrin).  However, this is still the least reason why in particular Catholic sect has to insist on feigning "The Gospel of Thomas" as a non-authentic one. This gospel reports that Ben-Pandera named his “brother” James in place of Simon Peter as successor of his.  Hereby the corresponding passages of the “authentic” chronicles turn out as interpolations with hindsight, obviously perpetrated by the followers of the Christians’ bigwig of Rome (claiming to be successor of Simon Peter). Why do the "authentic" chronicles deceive in this case and not the “gospel” of Thomas? The evidence is given by the historic fact that indeed James – and not Simon Peter -- became head of the Christian community after Ben-Pandera’s disappearance from the scene in Palestine. Again, we find the scheme we called “Constantine Subreption”, i.e. grifting that what one cannot obtain by reason and fair play by imputing one’s lust for power as will to an authority. In this case, the authority is Ben-Pandera, in other cases “god”, Emperor Constantine or an “apostle” etc.

Now, we want to demonstrate how much the “authentic” chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) miraculously confirm in particular Rome’s lust for power and how less the very early Christian scriptures (e.g. the Didache) and the “non-authentic” do so.

“Authentic gospels”: To the question who was Jesus (the death penalty convict) Simon Peter answered according to: - Matthew (16:15-19): Jesus (the death penalty convict) is a) Messiah (Greek: Christos, b) son of god, c) man for founding a new sect - Mark (8:29): Only Messiah (Greek: Christos) - Lu (9:20): Only Messiah (Greek: Christos)

The “non-authentic” Gospel of Thomas: To the question who was Jesus (the death penalty convict) Simon Peter answered according to Logion 13: Jesus (the death penalty convict) is - no “god”, - no “son of god”, - no “part of god”, - no Messiah (Greek: Christos) - no angel but - only  l i k e  an (righteous) angel

The “authentic” Didache or Teaching of the Apostles, i.e., early Christian church’s order, if not the first one: - no “son of god”, - no “part of god”, - no Messiah (Greek: Christos) - no angel but - only a servant of god. - According to this scripture “son of god” is the “world-deceiver” (Did 16:4).

According to the very early scripture (Didache) and “apocryphal” (“non-authentic”) chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) Ben-Pandera is no Messiah (Greek: Christos) because he failed to turn out as Messiah (Greek: Christos)   by failing to accomplish the feature of being “King of Israel” (Joh 12:13)… We do not need to mention that he even is rejected as "Son of God" in the "Didache" and not mentioned as such in the just quoted apocryphal "gospels".  Therefore, those scriptures  correctly do not call him Messiah (Greek: Christos). However, Christian desperadoes want to hide and conceal addressing and worshiping someone as “Christ” that failed to turn out as such. Very typical of desperadoes, Christians made this failed “Messiah” (Greek: Christos) even “god” to divert attention from the fact that he turned out as an impostor instead of a Messiah (Greek: Christos), on Palm Sunday.

As already clued, it is to assume that the passages of claiming Peter as successor in canonized gospels (e.g., Joh 21:15ff) are already the first “Constantine Subreption”, pardon, “donation” of Catholicism, respectively, of the popes, i.e. here it is about deceitful afterwards interpolations.

 Who wonders that the popes want to get rid of everything impairing and restricting their lust for power…? Oh my goodness, what Christian criminals have to suffer, all over and everywhere…! They even have to suffer from their own scriptures because “heretics” always prosecute liars…

Correspondingly, the most important features what the canonized have to conceal – what is as important as that what they have to contain -- are kept secret. At most, it is about features, which necessarily come into being when lies and deceits are presented: suppression, concealing and hiding of the truths.  Regarding “authentic gospels”, this means:

· Docetism, i.e., eliminating those passages debunking  the “prophet’s” of perfidy (Christians’ cant: “love”) deceit about crucifixion and resurrection -

· Embarrassing facts  about Ben-Pandera, e.g., as illegitimate child[4], miscarriage of nature,[5] “career” as slave  in Egypt[6], homosexual inclination[7], sanctuaries after his fake of ascension to heaven “residing to god’s right” etc. -

· Examination of   the “tenets” before Palm Sunday, on the one hand and those uttered afterwards, on the other, i.e., if the corresponding “tenets” before Palm Sunday are to reconcile with those ones after it, especially with Ben-Pandera’s defeat (on Palm Sunday) and becoming a  death penalty convict. This means that the Christian censors had to scrutinize what expression of Jesus before Palm Sunday contradict the latter canting of his defeat as “vicarious suffering” and  “vicarious atonement”. One can put is also this way: Christians censors had to scrutinize if later (after his defeat on Palm Sunday) contrived “vicarious suffering for the sins” for his believers does not contradict what Ben-Pandera said before.[8] This was the most difficult job when concocting and editing the chronicles (“gospels”) and is still the best way to debunk “vicarious suffering as lamb of god for the sins” for his believers as sheer lie, deceit and outrage on humankind, until to today!  For instance, when pointing out Ben-Pandera's purported tempations by Satan in the desert on e101 of this expostion, we already mentioned that Christian censors missed to correct Satan's and Ben-Pandera's common point of view that -- referring to Ps 91:11-12 -- both took the view that a "son of god" does not have to suffer in the least (see: Mt 4:6, Lu 4:9-12). Here, they missed to see that after his wretched defeat on Palm Sunday their "god" had to answer to Satan that "the son of god" even has to suffer death penalty. The Christian correctors failed to see that here as well Satan as Ben-Pandera (Christians' cant: Jesus "Christ") turn out to be Docetists. That is the utmost heresy in very early Christianity...!

· Elimination of expressions confessing  the “prophet’s“ of  perfidy (Christians’ cant: “love”) obsession to hatred and vengeance, too open, e.g. as existent in the "gospel" imputed to Thomas (see, for example, logion 98) or in “The Gospel of Philip”, e.g., “…for Jesus came to crucify the world” (Gospel of Philip).

· Blotting out all clues giving grounds for the “desposyni” (except Mary), i.e., that the blood relationship of Ben-Pandera is authorized to govern Christianity. (This did not comply with the already growing will to power of Rome, e.g., that Jesus’  „brother“ James and not Peter is the lawful  successor of Jesus). More over, at least John and James Zebedee of his closest henchmen (Christians’ cant: “disciples”) were relatives of Ben-Pandera.

Very early Christian chronicles report that Ben-Pandera (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ”) revered his brother James whereas the canonized gospel only call his name (see: Mr 3:17, Mr 5:37, Mr 6:3) so that one is very surprised to see him among the closest henchmen (Christians’ cant: “disciples”) in the Acts of the Apostles. This is one of the most conspicuous as striking difference between “authentic” and “non-authentic” gospels. It is to presume that Rome’s "Constantine Subreption" (Christians' cant: "Constantine Donation") about Peter as “legitimate” successor of Ben-Pandera by far was not the only one but already a sufficient reason to denounce a corresponding “gospel” to be “non-authentic”! "Humble" and "modest" Christians rather would lay the world in ruins as to give up their lust for power! We will return to this revealing fact, below.

Scrutinizing the “tenets” before and after Palm Sunday, we expound in another exposition. We already said that in contrast with Christian imploringly beseeching to make us believe that Jesus (the death penalty convict) did not desire anything else but to be hanged on the gallows or cross, we do not believe that he ever wanted to become debunked as an accursed one of god.  This means hanging on a cross according to De 21:23.  The latter but not only the latter is the most convincing argument that Christian illicit annex to the Bible (Christians’ cant: New Testament) is not to reconcile with the Bible (Christians’ cant: “Old Testament”).

 Embarrassing truths about Ben-Pandera (the death penalty convict) means that the chronicles have to keep silent about his ugly outward appearance (miscarriage of nature)[9], his disgraceful biography, sexual life[10] and how he juggled his sorcery.

Docetism means that Jesus (the death penalty convict) did not suffer on the cross already because a god cannot suffer (see: Ps 91:11-12, Mt 4:6, Lu 4:9-12), viz, the purported happenings of “salvation”, i.e. crucifixion,  for the Christians' prevention to go hell did not take place, at least they did not happen by Ben-Pandera's hanging (but by that one of a double).  This means, salvation for Christians by Ben-Pandera failed, and they still have to go to hell (see: Koran, Su 4:159). Talking about the fact that Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera did not suffer on the cross since he replaced himself by a stuntman (double) was already tabooed when the Canon Muratori was written.

This means further that Christian sect is nothing but an abominable fraud and criminality, nobody is able to outdo!  Finally Christians make slaves, robots and cash by putting out bait that Ben-Pandera (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ”) enabled those who believe in him to go to heaven. Without his faked suffering on the gallows or cross, each purportedly would have to go to hell. With this psychological terrorism and terror, Christian terrorists go fishing, i.e. catching their prey. Indirectly, even the earliest Christian Church Order (Didache) calls this deception. 

Even if Ben-Pandera really had suffered on the gallows, nevertheless Christianity would be abominable criminality by canting the ignominy of a bad loser, in that way. However, Christians do not only cant a bad loser, they always try averting attention from the fact addressing and worshiping someone as Messiah (Greek: Christos)   that failed to turn out as such. “King of Israel” (Joh 12:13)   is a necessary feature (condicio sine qua non) of the Messiah (Greek: Christos), i.e. failing to turn out as “King of Israel” (Joh 12:13)   also means having failed to turn out as Messiah (Greek: Christos). I.e., Christians want to hide and conceal addressing and worshipping someone as Messiah (Greek: Christos)   that failed to turn out as Messiah (Greek: Christos)!  On this lie, Christian organized crime is based requiring innumerable other lies, deceits and foul play, in its wake!

Generally, mammals and marsupials have more morals than those perfidious criminals that call themselves Christians.

Beside greediness (see: Ac 5:1-10), Docetism became one of the first reason for Christians’ perfidious murders.

Already ancient Roman Emperor Julian (332- 362) watched how perfidiously the henchmen of the sect of perfidy “love” one another.

“I  (Roman emperor Julian) experienced that even beasts of prey are not that hostile minded on human beings than one Christian on another one.”[11]

· That is the “love” of perfidy!

· This is the “love” of the perfidious!

· This is the sect of perfidy called Christianity!

· Christian sect is no vitiation of the hatred and vindictiveness of a miscarriage of nature but genuine application of perfidy!

It is to doubt that those the perfidious know anything about love… What desperadoes lack at most, they are used fooling and flattering themselves keeping...

“The Gospel of Peter” originally being part of Christian canon (Muratori) finally became removed since it was "judged" too much “docetic”. In this case, “docetism” is the information that the instigator of planet earth's most organized crime (Jesus “Christ”) was wanted for arson on the Jerusalem Temple…  The firebug shall be styled as “innocent lamb”… Everything else is “non-authentic”… The way the “The Gospel of Peter" became removed from the desperadoes' "New Testament" provides evidence that the desperadoes, i.e. Christians, selected the "books" of that "canon" corresponding to that what they liked but not corresponding to authenticity! "The Gospel of Peter" is as much or less "authentic" or "non-authentic" as all other chronicles of the "New Testament"! Everything else is "argued" according to the desperadoes' supreme credo: Faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:29, Mt 21:21) and the truths, anyway!

However, nobody is perfect and Christian hypocrites and the perfidious , not at all! Even, in the canonized gospels, in particular, in the chronicle imputed to John (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of John“) there is enough “Docetism” as to convict planet Earth’s most atrocious and abominable felons of deceit.

 “Authentic” gospels just have to keep the victims waiting for Godot[12] so that Christian rogues with frocks (Christians’ cant: “good shepherds”) can lead the victims up the garden path and fleece them for their benefit. Already the “Canon Muratori” relates that early Christians mutually reproached forgeries one to another.[13]  Among forgers, the one finds fault with the other with doing that what each among them is used to doing (psychological projection)…  Therefore, do no blame Christians to lie incessantly…!

As already mentioned, early Christian censors imputed "authoritative" names to fob their concoctions off as “gospels” on Christian deceivers that wanted to be deceived (application of the trick of "Constantine" subreptions). Even if those Christian authorities (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) wrote something, that what is imputed to them until today, it is nothing but Christian bigwigs’ (Christians’ cant: “good shepherds’”) contrivances of will to power (Christians’ cant: potestas ligandi and et solvendi) insinuated to those “authorities”.  We only know that Christians wrote the chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”). We do not know the name of the authors and we do not need to know them!

Today, as we already demonstrated not only those combating (religious) crimes and criminals but also  Christian “theologians” do not contest  firstly that none of the canonized chronicle (Christians’ cant: “gospel”) was  committed to paper by that individual to whom it is imputed and secondly that the writers of the canonized chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) cribbed from others’ writings. 

· The chronicle imputed to Matthew (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of Matthew“) is not written by “apostle” Matthew, a tax collector (Mt 9:9, Mt10:3), who is said to be one of the twelve apostles (Mt 10:3, Mr 3:18, Lu 6:15, Ac 1:13).[14]

·  The chronicle imputed to Mark (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of Mark“) is not set down by John called Mark (Acts: 12:12; 13:5, 13; 15:37, 39), who is said to be a companion of Simon Peter in Rome being at loggerheads with Saul Paul.[15]

·  The physician Luke doubtfully composed “The Gospel of Luke”. [16]

· The chronicle imputed to John (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of John“) is not written by fisherman John (Zebedee) (Mt 4:21), who, like Matthew, belonged with the so-called twelve “apostles" (Mt 10:2, Mr 3:17, 6:14, Joh 21:2, Ac 1:13). With certainty, it is to assume that the latter did not write the chronicle since no sane individual could assume that an illiterate one is able to write a gospel. [17]   Christian “theologian” Vielhauer: “We do not know who wrote the 4^th gospel.”[18]

Everything provides evidence that lying and deceiving is a matter of course for Christians, in principle and from the very outset. Lying and deceiving are the least difficulty for the negative selection of those dregs of humankind (Ben-Pandera’s cant: “the sick needing a physician”, see: Mt 9:12. Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31)! Christians' chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) were concocted and fabricated as everything is done in a sect of perfidy (Christians’ cant: “love”), viz, according to the slogan of desperadoes:

Mt 17:20 NRSV

20  He said to them, "Because of your little faith. For truly I tell you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you."

In particular, no perfidy and abomination are impossible for Christian desperadoes! Indeed, here the word “nothing” is restricted to nothing…! Nothing is impossible only for god, due to his omnipotence. My word, this miscarriage of nature[19] gathering miscarriages of nature (his jargon: “the sick needing a physician”, see: Mt 9:12. Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31) fools himself and his fellow creeps, crooks and rogues to be “god…!

I see:

· If everything is possible for  believers why should one not fake contrivances of perfidy (Christians’ cant: “love”) to be “god’s word” or why not imputing writings to authorities they never have written them?

· If nothing were impossible for  Christian rogues with frock, why not committing the crime of forging a "Constantine Donation" and hereby bagging even one third of a whole continent, one never would obtain when keeping to fair play? Did Ben-Pandera say: Everything is possible to believers, except "Constantine Donations"? Did Ben-Pandera say that only to god nothing is impossible...?

· If nothing is impossible for the Christian rogues with frock and without frock why should one not fake to be “Messiah (Greek: Christos), “god’s son” or even “god”?

· If nothing is impossible for the (Christian) believers, so why should one not palm lies off  as “truths” and a death penalty convict off as “god” or even why not a stunt  off  as “resurrection from the dead”?

· If everything is possible for the (Christian) believers, why  felons should not pose as “martyrs” or even “saints”?

· Where is the limit if nothing is impossible for deceivers, pardon, for the Christian foul mouths, criminals and mass-murderers?

Whoever understands Mt 17:20 (faith shifts mountains) that one has not only understood the desperadoes' supreme credo and real "god" but also completely Christian organized crime! Mt 17:20 is the desperadoes’ passion to perfidy (Christians’ cant: “love”)!  It is not only the manner, in which the chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels) became concocted,  but it is that what the “chronicles and Jesus (the death penalty convict) convey: The rules of perfidy always are applied. 

Obviously not only Judas Iscariot was a heretic among the closest henchmen (Christians’ cant: “disciples”) of Ben-Pandera (the death penalty convict). Oh what a poor sod, pardon, “god” to be that mistaken when choosing his henchmen…! Nothing is impossible for Christian “god”. So, why  not making mistakes by mistakes or errors by errors?

Imagine one of the “Twelve” preached a heretic gospel expressively condemned by the Decretum Gelasianum (at the end of the 5th century). Listen what early Christian rogue (Christians’ cant: “church father”) Eusebius (he died 342) conveys to us:

” Matthew also having first proclaimed the gospel in Hebrew, when on the point of going also to other nations, committed it to writing in his native tongue, and thus supplied the want of his presence to them, by his writings.” [20]

One never knows what Christians have to "suffer"… Oh my god, not only “authentic gospel writer” Matthew one of the closet twelve henchmen (Christians’ cant: “disciples”) quoted “apocryphal gospels” but -- what an impertinence! – even Atrott does so…

“Martyrdom” for Christians all over and at every turn…! Quod licet Iovi non-licet bovi (What is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the cattle)… One never knows what “martyrdom” the henchmen and henchwomen of perfidy have to “suffer”…

No poet could contrive a better comedy!

Oh yeah, liars and deceivers have to suffer “martyrdom”, all over. In particular, if the opponents and enemies are enjoying free speech and cannot be burnt at stakes while being alive…! Do not forget that the Christian felons and murderers want you to feel pity with them… The more murders they commit, the more they desire to be regarded as "martyrs of the truths" and not a murderers... They believe it is sufficient to call the murdered victims "murderers"...! Finally, faith shifts mountains and why not the reputation of "martyrs" to (Christian) murderers? 

Faith shifts mountains, so why not making others feel pity with planet Earth's most foul mouths, criminals and murderers, i.e. Christians?

Nothing is certain in Christian sect but the lust for power, at any price and the triumph of will according Christian desperadoes’ really credo: Faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and the truths anyway.  Therefore, everybody has to obey us (Christian foul mouths, miscarriages of nature, damp squibs, creeps n’ crooks dolled up like parrots wanting to vicars of “god” on earth…). Everybody has to comply with that what Christian impostors and Mafiosi hiding their fatuity behind a mask of “law of authorization by god” concocted corresponding to their obsession of triumph of will, lust for power and birdbrain… Finally, since 1870 (Vaticanum I) Christian sect has established the fake n' fraud of “infallibility”. Since then, Christian Mafiosi need neither chronicles (“gospels”) nor god, any longer since then finally their most impostors in a cockatoo's clothing does the job of “god”… 

Oh yeah, for Satan so loved the world that he gave his only Son Jesus and all  his Christian miscarriages of nature, creeps n’ crooks and   Mafiosi to the world to put upside “down” and downside “up” taking revenge (Christians' cant: "love")  on everybody who turned out better by nature than they do…

Concerning the concoction of the gospels this means that the latter already became “enhanced” by necessities of the lust for power of then dominating Christians. Self-service is no invention of the 20^th century. The Christians’ “New Testament” is the first self-service, however without paying, in exchange.

Christians' fabrication of a "god's son" purportedly ranking as equal to god is self-service in religion... In the same way, all Christian terms, for instance,  "love", "truths", "god", "humbleness", "vicarious atonement" etc. are self-service...

I see:   Matthew did not write “The Gospel of Matthew”. The chronicle imputed to Mark (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of Mark“) is not committed to paper by Mark. The chronicle imputed to John (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of John“) is not written by John and even half of the amount of “epistles” of Paul canonized to Christians’ “New Testament“ is not written by Paul, among others, the “The Epistle to the Hebrew”.  What else one ever could expect from the sect of perfidy obsessed with lust for power (faith shifts mountains and the truths, anyway) worshiping a lawfully convicted felon, respectively, a death penalty convict as “god”…?.

The only one -- possibly having written the gospel that is imputed to him -- is Luke. Even this stays a more or less founded assumption without conclusive evidence. Therefore, even this does not mean that one can be sure that the chronicle imputed to Luke (Christians’ cant: „The Gospel of Luke“) really was written by the physician Luke, an attendant of Shaul Paul.  Nothing is certain in Christian sects but the triumph of will and lust for power: Faith shifts mountains and the truths anyway (see: Mt 17:20)!

More over, Luke certainly being no eyewitness even admits  that he did nothing but compiling and  concocting that what he found to be said and that what was already written before him as Christian “theologians” like, for instance, Bultmann and Vielhauer “revolutionarily” detected in the 20^th century.

Lu 1:1-4 NRSV

1 ¶ Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us,

2 just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word,

3  I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,

4  so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed.

Luke only demands having investigated carefully what is written and said about Ben-Pandera (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ”) and therefore believed among Christian. This is a fallacy since that what should be proven is presupposed, already. Christians’ prey shall believe everything written in their chronicles (Christians’ cant: “New Testament”), because it is feigned “god’s word” (application of the trick of "Constantine" subreption). However, this “god’s word” Luke indirectly  admits as record of rumors… There is no belief without reason. The reason for Christian belief is bagging that by foul play what the concerned cannot obtain by fair play, unless it is about the sheer and open lust for power of Christian slaveholders.  In addition, Christians believe those chronicles as “god’s word” because they flatter

· foul mouths to pose as “martyrs of the truths”,

· the felons to pose as “reverends” and “saints” and

· the miscarriages of nature and damp squibs to cant themselves as “first ones”, due to a parrot’s clothing…

In short: The Christians’ “believe”   their chronicles (Christians’ cant: “New Testament”) as  “god’s word” since they  flatter their lust for power and even enable them to rule those to which they cannot hold a candle by imputing their own lust for power to “god” as words of the latter (Constantine Subreption)…  Christian slaveholders believe the chronicles (Christians’ cant: “New Testament”) as “god’s word“ since they concocted them as “law of authorization“. While again imputing the latter to god, the Christian criminals live off their lust for power and all the criminality that necessarily is in the wake of it, to the full. Christians’ illicit annex (Christians’ cant: “New Testament”) is nothing but a faked “law of authorization” imputed to “god” to rule the world what they cannot do when keeping to fair play (application of the trick of  "Constantine" subreption). Christian “god’s word” are the by-laws of an organized crime (religious Mafia) with a "god" of its own and "morals" of its own, precisely adjusted to the foul mouth and foul play of those organized criminals faking a "religion".

For instance, the concoction imputed to Luke became canonized since it at most complies with the mentioned requirements for the fabrication of a Christian chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel”) as early Christian sect fancied them to be. That means Luke concocted that what he presents corresponding those features that are mentioned in the already quoted scripture of the Canon Muratori.

What does it mean that writers of the canonized chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) selected their concoctions from oral and written tradition that already existed when they started compiling their scriptures (“gospels”)? It means that claiming everything outside the four canonized chronicles as non-authentic, indirectly and inadvertently turns out the canonized chronicles also as non-authentic since on that condition, they are composed of non-authentic materials. What is composed from non-authentic pieces evenly stays to be non-authentic. That is why Christians disingenuously – as Christians are -- pretend that eyewitnesses of Ben-Pandera (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ”) wrote the chronicles. Indeed, Christians never succeeded in passing those 68 chronicles (Christians’ cant: “gospels”) they did not canonize off as non-authentic ones without concealing that  the canonized scriptures even are composed of other chronicles (they declared as  non-authentic ones, since 367).

However, even being supposed to be an eyewitness but not complying with that what  Christians fancy to be expedient for their lust for power does not help from becoming rejected and denounced as “non-authentic”. This lot happened to the "Gospel of Thomas".

 On top of everything, here it even is to add that Christian deceitful chronicle writers did not only copy from already existing Christian writing but also from non-Christian ones. For instance, the story of Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera’s (Christians’ cant: Jesus “Christ’s”) birth and begetting presented by Matthew and Luke but obviously (not only) rejected by Mark and John is cribbed from Christian rival Mithras religion[21]. There is no splendid plume in the world Christian Mafiosi and impostors would not filch…!  One never knows what “miracles” happen if the lastsucceed in posing as the “first ones” to all the goofs n' fools stooping to all (Christian) spoofs…!

R. Bultmann is famous among his Christian fellow deceivers for having demonstrated that all the canonized chronicles are compositions from that what Vielhauer calls “pre-existing literary specimen”.  Therefore, one cannot emphasize enough:  Declaring all Christian writings beside the four canonized ones to be apocryphal or non-authentic ones also means to declare the canonized chronicles as apocryphal and non-authentic.  Trying to save their crimes of deceit, Christians declared that much as “apocryphal” that finally there is nothing but apocryphal “gospels” in this sect. Therefore, finally Catholics resort to infallibility of their topmost impostor (Catholics’ cant: “pope”). Here once more, Christians made themselves  “god” since god does not do what the Catholics want… Christians following Satan’s Christ know that they cannot rely on god.  Therefore they rely on the fake of "god" Ben-Pandera and their Roman creep n’ crook  playing “god” on earth…

That is Satan's Christ doing for you, oh Christian!  Satan even makes a cerebellum and birdbrain of pope “infallible” and the utmost felons of humankind posing as “martyrs” and what, you Christian, oh yeah, what do you do for him, in exchange?