Christian cannibalism (Communion, Eucharist)

Chapter: 7, Part: 1

Satan has a Catamite -- his name is Jesus "Christ"

"Do not resist the evil" (Mt 5:39)

The credo of all organized crimes, Mafiosi, Satan and the "Sermon on the Mountain"! CHRISTIANITY THE "HUMAN RIGHT" OF CRIMINALITY...

Christian Cannibalism (Communion, Eucharist)

Sometimes there also is Honor among Thieves

“Jesus said, ‘Blessed is the lion which becomes man when consumed by man; and cursed is the man whom the lion consumes, and the lion becomes man.’” (The Gospel of Thomas)

"If, however, you (Christians) bite and devour one another, take care that you (Christians) are not consumed by one another." (Paul, Ga 5:15)

This file is also available as PDF and as ZIP or WORD.EXE

Firstly: Christian sham-morals (Eucharist, "crucifixion", "vicarious atonement" etc.) very typical of honor or morals among thieves and rogues

Secondly: Jesus’ passionate commitment to cannibalism

Thirdly: What is honor among thieves or rogues' moral?

The Difference of the Exposition of this Topic here (of the year 2000) and in the book "Jesus' Bluff - The universal Scandal of the World (M.Magnes)" in 2009, See:

This treatise was written in the year 2000. It is one of the first contributions to bare-jesus.net. In the meantime research and knowledge have advanced. The results of them are set down in the 17^th chapter of the book “Jesus’ Bluff – The universal Scandal of the World (M. Magnes)”, published by PublishAmerica, Baltimore MD, USA, 2009, p. 232-259. Chapter: 17 is called. "The Fuss of Deliverance of Jesus’ Body to Judas—the Origins of Christian Eucharist”. There, it is spelled out that Ben-Pandera (nickname: Jesus „Christ“) fooled himself that by passing the (in wine) dipped morsel to Judas Iscariot) he passes his own blood and flesh, i. e., his body, to Judas so that Judas‘ hanging on the cross (of Calvary) was that one of his (Jesus‘). The book also demonstrates that Ben-Pandera (Jesus „Christ“) hardly succeeded in convincing his fellow desperadoes of this inventively self-deception. At least the majority of them, if not all the twelve closest henchmen, rejected this self-deception. John -- disclosing the truth about Jesus' bluff of "crucifixion" and "rising from the death" in a ciphered way, anyway -- jeers at the “Holy Communion” of desperadoes’ boss (Jesus) with one of his fellows (Judas). He ridicules his boss by saying that hereby Satan entered Judas (13:27). Here, he indirectly calls Jesus Satan... General "Eucharist" or "Holy Communion" later came into being by the inference of other early Christians that what Judas did with Ben-Pandera („Jesus“) they also can do with him (Jesus). (Greater details in the book). In a final edition of bare-jesus.net I recommend to replace this part (701) by chapter 17 of the book “Jesus’ Bluff”. I do not possess the copyright of “Jesus’ Bluff”, any longer and therefore, cannot do it now. Until then, I only can state that this treatise stemming from the year 2000 is much superior to everything that is unloaded to the market regarding this topic (in order to blur and darken the matter in place of enlightening it).

Hans Atrott, in December 2009

You can read excerpts of the book and chapter 17 on google books.Go to www.google.com. Click on books and insert in the search list "Jesus' Bluff". At the first place will appear "Jesus' Bluff" - click on it and you can read the excerpts.



Firstly: Christian sham-morals (Eucharist, crucifixion, vicarious atonement etc.) very typical of honor or morals among thieves and rogues



      Nowhere else the mon(k)ey-Christ's load of rubbish frankly emerges more than here. Jesus mon(k)ey-Christ and his mon(k)ey-Christians try fobbing cannibalism off as utmost "morals" on themselves and on the victims of their trickeries. As we are about to demonstrate, Christian Eucharistie is cannibalism, monkey morals and all my eye and Betty Martin!

          However, this ravenous wolf in a sheep's clothing knows how he can finagle others. Presumely, the mon(k)ey-Christ believes in his monkey morals ... Of course, he is a very cunning, sneaky, crafty and shrewd rogue without frock but a philosophical ignoramus what he ties hiding by faked miracles. So, this nutty habit came into existence.

Now as a paperback for 10.95 US$ and E-BOOK for 9.95 US$!

PublishAmerica just has edited as well an inexpensive paperback version of "Jesus' Bluff" (price: 10.95 US$) as an E-Book that also is compatible with Apple's new IPAD (price: 9.95 US$). For the E-Book version there are no additional costs but the fee of 9.95 US$. In order to download the e-book version of Jesus' Bluff click here. Shipping of other versions within the United States amounts to 3.99 US$ and to each other country in the world 12 US$. So, in the United States the book as a material copy now is available for about 15 US$ (including shipping) and outside the U.S.A. for about 20€. Softcovers of the book (ISBN: 978-1-61582-816-6) also are still available by Borders. com (click here) or Amazon.com and its national branches, e.g. in Germany by Amazon.de (click here) or in Japan by Amazon Japan (click here) etc. In India flipkart.com ships the book to all locations over the subcontinent at a price of 1713 Indian Rupees. That are about 28€ (click here). Here, shipping fees also are included and not pay in addition. Ordering the book as a paperback from the publisher (click here) reduces the price about one third, even compared to India. PublishAmerica ships the book by airmail. One gets the book within two weeks in all countries, at the latest. There are two possibilities of getting excerpts of the book: 1.) at Goggle Books - click here. 2.) On the Chinese website bookpreviewer. com which is run by Xiamen ChinaSource Internet Service Co,. ltd. - click here.

      Sometimes, Mafiosi have strange manners and quaint customs of their own and those ones Christians foster.

Christian sect is the only sect making e a "god" of its own by lifting a fellow desperado of its own to "god".

However, the holy scripture to which this faking "god" and his Christian henchmen are used to referring for (sham-) evidence (the Jews' Bible or "Old Testament") , in fact, simply turns Christian "god" Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") out to an accursed one of god (see: De 21:23).

You understood correctly: The holy scripture to which Jesus "Christ" and his Christian henchmen (the Jews' Bible or "Old Testament") refer to produce (sham-) evidence of their claims and demands as purported evidence about divinity of Jesus "Christ" does not turn out the latter to be preferred -- in whatever way -- to god. On the contrary, it proves him (Jesus Satan's "Christ") to be an accursed one of god like Satan is accursed of god (see: De 21:23. More over, the Christians claim this scripture to be absolutely true. Who objects?

Consequently the henchmen of an accursed one of god worshiping him as god, viz, Christians evenly turn out being accursed by god.

Therefore nobody should wonder about those strange things Jesus "Christ" introduced, for instance,   foul play as "love" or "morals", lies as "truths" etc. and vice versa. Consequently, nobody should wonder those quaint customs, for instance, cannibalism he introduced as pretended utmost "love" and "morals" to his sect. That's sod's law! Those are rogues' quaint customs!

What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

Correspondingly are the "morals" and those quaint customs Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") the accursed one of god

Christian swineherds and their slaves even practice cannibalism introduced by instigator of Christian sect, Jesus "Christ" .

      However, at first let us start with a small quiz.

Query no. 1: Who did coin the following saying?

"He who will not eat of my body and drink of my blood, so that he will be made one with me and I with him, the same shall not know salvation…” [i]

      Well, who did it? Jesus? The well-conditioned Christian sectarian could think so. However, zero points for the Christian. This passionate commitment to cannibalism – „come and see how friendly the Lord tastes” – was coined by the cult of Mithras. The quotation itself is attributed to Zarathustra (about 600 B.C.E.).

And now query no. 2:

Whoever did coin the following saying?:

So Jesus said to them, "Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.. [ii]

    Answer: Jesus!

    That’s right.

      Now and then, there are also “morals” and "honor" among thieves, crooks and Mafiosi. In German one even speaks about a rogues' honor. However, the perceptions of "ethics", “morals” or "love" among thieves or Mafiosi talliy with the strange convolutions of their brain, which normally an individual does not comprehend. So, for example, some Mafia or gangsters' gangs have the habit of drinking the blood of its accomplices, especially when new members are initiated.

    The Christian "Communion" or „Eucharist“ is nothing different with that but more abominable. There, the Christian foul mouths do not only drink the blood of their instigator, boss and “god” but even eat his flesh. Those folks that committed humankind’s most abominable atrocities and mass murders that are past comprehension thus perform cannibalism...!

     Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (magician name: Jesus "Christ" ) fancies magic powers to the flesh, all over.

Joh 3:6 NRSV

6 What is born of the flesh is flesh, and what is born of the Spirit is spirit.

           Those magic powers he fancies about the flesh constitute his cannibalism as well his and his Christians' hostile as lunatic mind on sexuality! That is why Christian Mafiosi at least fake to be abstinent from sexual intercourse as lifestyle, on the one hand and even perform cannibalism, on the other. Both is due to the magic power conjurer Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Jesus "Christ" ") attributes to the flesh.   Flesh is not only food for quenching hunger. Flesh is spirit! By flesh one eats the spirit of the being to which the flesh belongs.

“Jesus said, ‘Blessed is the lion which becomes man when consumed by man; and cursed is the man whom the lion consumes, and the lion becomes man.’” [iii]

The lion becomes human being because he ate a human being. In addition, why is that human being abominable when having eaten a lion? Because human being becomes a lion! Thus, each eating Satan's Christ in Christian Communion become a Christ (or Christian of Satan) ... Therefore, mark the words of Christian bedlam: Whoever eats Jesus becomes Jesus! Analogically, prophet Muhammad could say: The Christians are those swine because the used to eating that much pork! That is Christian cannibalism.

What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

    Indeed Christian Eucharist correctly was perceived as cannibalism. Early Christian Mafiosi feasted it as a cannibalistic orgy on such a large scale so that Paul feels forced to warn his fellow Christian underhand foul players that they even will not get out of this orgy as corpse but in the stomach and guts of their fellow Christian Mafiosi!

Ga 5:15 NKJV

15 But if you (Christians) bite and devour one another, beware lest you be consumed by one another!

      So Paul to his fellow early Christian underhand foul players! Paul gives evidence that Christian Communion is perceived as cannibalism, already from the very outset. He is correct because nothing else did Jesus "Christ" mean by it, even if Christian sect tries hiding this embarrassing truth. Devouring one another – that is the „love“ Christian Mafiosi „love“ one another! In particular because of its Eucharist Christian sect is a bedlam of murder, hypocrites, man-eaters, ogres and ogresses! In the beginning, Christian sect is as barbaric and as terrorist as later. Christian foul mouths devour Christian foul mouths!

What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

     That is the peak of “civilization” and “culture” those barbarians and underhand foul players „contributed” to humankind. Ugh, Christian foul mouths, ugh! Do you trust in man-eaters telling the truth?

      In such a “miasma” of religious bastards n’ dastards, schmucks n’ thugs and fools n’ goofs full of spoofs spite, crimes, murder, perfidy and infamy are a matter or course (see: Ac 5: 1-10) and cannibalism not only becomes a custom but even a sacrament.   Those are the sacraments of a sect, in which Satan or his Anointed one (Greek: Christos) are worshiped as “god”.

     How much a matter of course cannibalism is to Christian foul mouths demonstrates another passage from the „god’s word“ of this heinous and abominable sect that already murdered about 300 Millions of individuals – more than all other organized crimes together. Whoever murders that much finally devours his corpse and that is said verbatim:

Re 17:18-19 NRSV

17 …"Come, gather for the great supper of God,

18 to eat the flesh of kings, the flesh of captains, the flesh of the mighty, the flesh of horses and their riders—flesh of all, both free and slave, both small and great."

          What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

       I see, Christian bastards n’ dastards eat, eat and eat human beings as if you eat pork or beef …! Drink blood as if you drink beer! Eat, eat and eat human beings, you ugly and perfidious Christian rogues n’ frogs or schmucks n’ thugs!

    Ugh, Christian Mafiosi, ugh – shame on you! Is it possible that a creature (I intentionally do not say human being!) can fall more than those heinous man can eating Christian miscarriages of nature? Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (cannibal name: Jesus "Christ" ) has no qualms about introducing cannibalism to Mafia. However else could be customs of a sect or Mafia, in which Satan and his son are addressed „god“ and likewise worshiped?: Murder (see: Ac 5: 1-109, cannibalism, barbarities – and on top of everything all is camouflaged by „love“, „charity“, yes, even perfidiously as „enemy love” ... Those are the „loves“ and „charities“ of Satan, his (Jesus) Christ, murderers and man-eaters, in particular, how they “love” their enemies!

      However one could speak about lies and deception? Does not Satan or his Anointed one (Greek: Christos) and their Christian foul mouths honestly think that to be “love” and “charity”? Cannibalism belongs with a felons’ sect and evenly with a Satan’s sect and therefore to Christian Mafia, anyway. However, do not forget what Saul Paul rightly tells you: As member of this (Christian) Mafia you cannot always rely on “playing” the active part pertaining to that deadly game …! Those are the Christian foul mouths’ contrivances about “protecting lives” and being “pro life” …! Are Cannibals afraid of running short of their source of food?

      The “Brother of the Lord” James gives evidence that murdering is the Christian foul mouths’ lifestyle from the very outset:

Jas 4:1-2 NKJV

1 ¶ Where do wars and fights come from among you (Christians)? Do they not come from your desires for pleasure that war in your members?

2 You lust and do not have. You (Christians) murder and covet and cannot obtain. You fight and war.

       What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

     “War”, “waging war”, envy (“desire and do not have”), and “murder” – that is Christian barbarians’ sect! Murdering is the Christian foul mouths’ lifestyle from the very outset! Christian sect is foul play, in the very principle and from the very, very outset. Christianity is a gathering of underhand foul players, i.e., of the moral scum of nature’s creation! That belongs with Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy.

     Now, everybody knows why these anti-sexual miscarriages, failures and damp squibs of nature, goofs n’ fools, bastards n’ dastards, mugs n’ schmucks etc. hate to make love. Why? Because they prefer murdering and eating one another! They do not only murder they even eat human beings, their fellow Christian underhand foul players, oh yeah, even their “god”, who is the topmost hoodlum of theirs! Do you trust in murderers telling the truths?

     Who wonders with regard to those spiteful creatures? So, the Christian foul mouths even outdo „normal“ Mafiosi and gangsters because the latter do not eat the flesh of their boss but confine themselves to drink blood. „Come and see how friendly the Lord tastes...“, i.e., come and see what thrilling cannibalism is...! That is very genuine and typical of convolutions of thieves’ honor or rogues' moral!

      Of course, thieves or terrorists consider their honor and morals to be superior to that one of the common respectable and decent citizen. Christian foul mouths alike are used to doing if on top of everything they still palm off their thieves' honor or rogues' morals as “mysteries” of their deception the apostrophize "belief".

     On top of rogues’ morals are: Blood, death, slaughters, bloodthirstiness, tortures, stakes and bestiality. Only in that way, rouges, Mafiosi, villains, blackguards, felons and Christian foul mouths can imagine salvation – quite according to their depraved nature. So even, or all the more Jesus! For this reason there is his irresistible will -- anyway and by hook or by crook -- to accomplish execution, bloodshed, killing, murder, torments, tortures, i.e., crucifixion for himself or a stuntman.

     Therefore, man's crook, man's deceiver, Pardon, "man’s son" implicitly, anyway and at all costs has to be executed -- respectively a stuntman of his, because the loudmouth itself was too coward and too perfidious. This is very genuine and typical of the way how rouges, villains, blackguards, Mafiosi and other creeps n' crooks --like the Christian foul mouths are -- think. The Christian foul mouths’ ideology – so far one pompously can call it an ideology – is a paragon of honor among thieves or rogues.

     Islam declines those Christian rouges' morals. According to my knowledge Muhammad had been the first widely known figure smelling the rat that the Christian foul mouths’ instigator and boss (Jesus) was not executed on the cross in person but mendaciously, hypocritically and insidiously -- like he and his fellow Christian foul mouths ever had been, are and will be – replaced himself by a stuntman for that “vicarious atonement”:

That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Apostle of Allah". But they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not…[iv]

Undoubtedly that is true as we produce evidence in another treatise,[v] in many respects, Moslems are much closer to the truth about Jesus than the Christian foul mouths are. The latter are remote at the utmost from it, due to their swindling and deceitful, hypocritical, mendacious and barbarian mind. Muhammad, indeed rightly, refused those Christian thieves' honor or rogues' morals instinctively.

   According to this prophet, god does not need any bloodbaths and massacre, due to his infinite mercy. However, rogues, murderers, Mafiosi, desperadoes and barbarians need them and Christian foul mouths anyway.

   This indirectly produces psychological evidence that the conversion of former greater early Christian geographical regions (e.g., in Asia Minor and Northern Africa) to Islam is a moral and intellectual progress. Those parts of the globe made an effort to overcome the catacombs of Christian barbarians - even if Muhammad did not realize – at least, the full extend -- of the grimace of this instigator.

Indeed, the Christian foul mouths’ claims of any morals are nothing else but honor among thieves or rogues' moral – in view of all the outrages, atrocities and abominations that sect perpetrated and that are past comprehension. Jesus' sham-morals enable those barbarities and even justify them.

   And "morals" enabling and justifying those abominations or something similar, are honor amongst thieves and rogues or Christian sham-morals. Justification of these outrages by Christian sham-morals is already proven by the fact that even the most abominable atrocities perpetrated by Christian sect cannot do any harm to Christian sect's "moral" reputation in Christianly enslaved countries.



   This precisely produces evidence that the Christian "morals" are “honor” and “morals” among thieves or rogues. In order to make it understandable also for less intelligent folks: What is honor amongst thieves and rogues? Definition: “Honor” and/or “morals” amongst thieves or rogues is evident, if even the worst outrages and barbarities cannot do any harm to those perpetrating ones. This evidently is the case concerning the worst organized crimes of our planet: Christendo(o)m.

   Any (honest) moral one says as Jesus himself admits:

Mt 7:16-17 RSV

16 You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles?

17 So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit.

   This saying turns Jesus and the Christian foul mouths out as unscrupulous and brazen liars and ruthless deceivers, because they (Jesus and the Christian foul mouths!) always claim precisely according to the "honor" amongst (Christian) thieves and rogues: No, one never can know and especially judge us by our lies, deceits, crimes, felonies, outrages, crusades, mass-murders, genocide, atrocities, barbarities and abominations but only by our "excuses" we (Jesus and the Christian foul mouths rogues) always palm off on you for them -- as each rogue claiming honor is used to doing so...!

   Jesus judges himself by the words of his own and debunks those, who worship him as the "god"... Anyway, Christian faith and reason, both equally turn out Jesus and the Christian as the Planet’s most outrageous and organized crime and barbarity.

   Jesus himself was a felon, whose crimes were already judged to be worth punishing death penalty. However, the additional felonies he perpetrated, are out of all proportions to this one that was already deemed worth punishing maximum penalty. Jesus already killed several little children of rival prophetess Jezebel:

Re 2:22 -23 RSV

22 Behold, I (Jesus) will throw her (my rival Jezebel) on a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her doings;

23 and I (Jesus) will strike her (my rival Jezebel's) children dead...

    What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

    More over, this above-mentioned slaughterer and children's murderer (Jesus "Christ" ) is the instigator of all his perfidious schmucks' (Christian foul mouths') spite, lies, deceits, crimes, infamous murders, mass-murders, outrages, abominations and other barbarities. Already the latter makes him to the first , most (execrable) felon among all bipeds, to the incarnated abomination in a human shape.

   Anyway, if there is a devil or not, there is a human being having the traits of Satan: Jesus "Christ" ! There is a place where Satan is worshiped as the "god": Christendo(o)m. And Satan even has a name: Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" . In What way do Satan and Christ differ from each other? By faking "god", "god's son", "love", "charity", "morals", "truths", "spiritual welfare", "vicarious atonement" or "remission of sins" etc.? No, those are essential parts of the perfidy of both!

   Is not Christendo(o)m -- that barbarians' sect -- a fruit of Satan, pardon, Jesus, is not it? Whom do the Christian worship as their teacher, respectively, coach? Did he say that his absolutely correct recognition ("you shall know them by their fruit") is to apply to everybody but not to him and his infamous schmucks of Christian foul mouths?

   Wherever does he restrict this knowledge to everybody but not to himself and his perfidious schmucks (Christians) ? However, are not those real creeps n’ crooks (Christians) directly or indirectly, always and deceitfully used to faking the reverse (that they and their “god” Jesus are not to known by their fruits but only by their excuses)?

   Corresponding to the Christian foul mouths' deception, barbarities and atrocities all their “sacraments”, e.g.,, of “Communion”, or the Christian doctrines, for instance, of crucifixion, vicarious atonement, remission of sins, sexuality, euthanasia, abortion, illegitimate children etc. are nothing else but honor among thieves or morals of terrorists and if still something else, then variants of their infamy.

   Those "sacraments" and "doctrines" – so far those concepts are not pompously applied to Christendo(o)m -- are „morals“ like Satan, Christ, their sects, terrorists, desperadoes and felons fancy them.

Secondly: Jesus’ passionate commitment to cannibalism

   Jesus "Christ" deems cannibalism among human beings as a very matter of course:

“The savior (Jesus "Christ" ) said, "Truly, as for those, do not esteem them (who do not believe in him) as men, but regard them as beasts, for just as beasts devour one another, so also men of this sort (that do not believe in him) devour one another.” [vi]

   What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

For the instigator of the globe's most organized crime that -- until now ! -- assassinated about 300 millions of human lives, mostly in an atrocious way, cannibalism is quite a usual lifestyle among human beings like he fancies pertaining to the animals (even there, it is only an exception)... The animals devour one another -- why not human beings? That is the way, Satan, pardon, Christ thinks ...!

    However, the Christian cannibals fancy devouring "god" when eating their topmost fellow schmuck... Ah, ah, ah...! Nothing ever could debunk that monstrosity of the scum of humankind (Jesus "Christ" ) more than this admission about cannibalism: The one that fakes to "love" human beings all over, indeed and in truth deems them all to be carnivores!

   How does he get those disgusting as abominable views? He thinks himself to be like a carnivore and is projecting that what he thinks about himself on all his congener (psychological projection). Who wonders about all the Christian outrages, atrocities, barbarities, murders, mass-murders, genocide and other abominations? Christendo(o)m - that is the lowest gutter and cesspit an individual ever can end...!

o Those are the views of humankind most felon!

o That is the instigation of our planet's utmost (religious) Mafia!

o That is the Christian foul mouths' faking "god!

o Those are the Christian foul mouths!

o That is the most danger to humankind and humanity!

   The background of the Christian farewell dinner ("Communion", "Eucharist"), by which cannibalism was introduced into Christian barbarian sect, is not Mithraism, because even in late occidental Mithraism no cannibalism took place. The Mithraic folks consumed flesh and blood of a bull.

   Therefore, they did nothing else what civilized people of today are used to doing, provided they are not vegetarians. There is nothing to object. It is possible that the Mithraic religion made a laughing stock of the Christian cannibals by the mentioned quotation.

   The cause of Christian cannibalism is indeed Jesus’ cannibalistic way of thinking. He really was in favor of man-eaters. Until today, the Christian foul mouths try palming off that abominable depravity of their cannibalism as “mystery of all mysteries” onto their slaves, morons, mugs, duffers, and dunces and onto all that regarding morals still are below most more highly developed mammals.

   In fact, there are further passionate commitments of Jesus to cannibalism. However, before he starts doing so, he ensures that everybody that believes in all the baloney he is driveling, of course, will be rewarded to heaven – even if he or she is most abominable mass-murderer, gangster, killer etc. – and those who do not believe it are condemned to hell even if they are distinguished people or even models of humanity -- the Christian foul mouths are no patch on them.

   Those are the strange convolutions of the brain of rouges’, murderers’, felons’ and barbarians' “god”. Who wonders in view of this thieve, rogue, death penalty convict, felon and barbarian?

Joh 6:47 RSV

47 Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life.

    Ah, ah, ah – do not make me laugh, cannibal. Always, when you start by saying truly, truly etc. you are lying very, very shamelessly... That’s your spurious money you dwarf are distributing by your big mountain…

Joh 6:48-57 RSV

48 I am the bread of life.

49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died.

50 This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die.

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh."

52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"

53 So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you;

54 he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.

55 For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56 He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.

57 As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me.

That is the way how thieves or objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) fancy morals: Instead of qualifying for an imaginary heaven by friendliness, amiability and humanity the Christian barbarians gobble, guzzle, booze and on top of everything they devour the boss of their own! My word!

Whoever can still doubt that the Christian barbarians confuse god with Satan and the hell with the heaven? Precisely according to their well-known ploy: to put upside down and downside up!

   As we will demonstrate below, everything is to comprehend literally – apart from the fact that neither Jesus nor his followers or the addressees of his tirades had any capacity of abstract thinking. Jesus’ flock, the members of his barbarian gang were folks of coarse, even terrorists – what the term of zealots means. Yes even according to their own "god's word": idiots (see: Acts 4:13, ancient Latin Vulgate Bible).

    Even Peter belonged with the zealot terrorists[vii] and murderers. Why should his perfidious schmucks differ from him? Jesus the prophet of nonviolence – that is the laughingstock of our Planet!

   Jesus' man eating “ideas” even become more clearly in the chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") that were oppressed by the Christian swineherds as "apocrypha". Let us remember Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera's (conjurer name: Jesus "Christ" ) addiction to cannibalism. Such a saying of a so-called "god" does not grow on trees, even if Christian imploringly want us to believe that:

“Jesus said, ‘Blessed is the lion which becomes man when consumed by man; and cursed is the man whom the lion consumes, and the lion becomes man.’” [viii]

    What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

The idea of cannibalism - provided one here can speak of an idea - is the assumption that while eating the meat of another being, one consequently also is absorbing the psyche or nature of the eaten being. That is precisely what Jesus says.

   Like an individual of the Stone Ages, Jesus believes that one absorbs the being of a lion while consuming such an animal. This means that the Christian barbarian god is on the same level or below of the barbarians of the Stone Ages or other primitive ones in the African bush.

Those are the fundamental principles of Christian cannibalism of Christian barbarity, at all. The Christian cannibals believe that they become "god" by materially and physically (flesh by flesh) devouring their "god". However, by doing that, they do not become "god" or like "god" but just monsters like carnivores. Two millennia of Christendo(o)m and all their skeletons in their closets illustrate that.

   They fool themselves being gods or like god but indeed they are comparable to hideous brutes in the wilderness.

   Ugh, Christian foul mouths, ugh! Ugh, barbarians, ugh!

Because they mix up god and sod,

They're deeming Jesus to be a god...

   What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

Pertaining to its nature cannibalism and so also Christian doctrines of Communion or Eucharist – provided it is not too pompous to speak about doctrines in this context – are nothing but sheer primitive and stupid materialism that contradicts any claims of human beings as spiritual ones. Everything that exists is matter and what is no matter, does not exist, either. That is what Jesus’ cannibalism is “teaching”.

   Only in this manner, one can acquire the psyche or nature of another being by consuming its meat, i.e., by devouring it. Once more, those convolutions of brain the Christian foul mouths ostentatiously label “theology”, turned out to be thin air of depraved morons.

   "The Acts of John" – the biography of Jesus so-called favorite disciple -- passes on the following saying of Jesus:

“I would eat, and I would be eaten.” [ix]

   The cannibal, “god” of the Christian barbarians and of the utmost depraved , among others tries to substantiate his cannibalism by saying that the one that eats also should be eaten… „Ingenious“...!

    In view of this fact the conjecture is not unfounded or wide off the mark that the early Christian foul mouths eat up the corpse of Jesus or his Stuntman – whoever was executed for the felonies Jesus committed. According to then level of technology, this was the most secure technique of removing a corpse without running the risk of getting convicted as deceivers.

    As it is well known, for those reasons the Christian barbarians do everything, really everything! Do not the Christian barbarians have „mysteries“ that really defy description? My word, what a confusion of brilliance with imbecility!: I eat that, so I must be eaten.

     It is really dangerous to go into a restaurant that is run by robots of the Christian barbarian sect... Let’s hope that those cannibals will not say to the guests: Did you finish? So, you have eaten and now it is your turn to get eaten... To eat and getting eaten that are -- according to barbaric „god“ Jesus "Christ" -- two sides of a coin.

    Especially Communion or Eucharist, this cannibalism is a Freudian slip debunking Jesus and the Christian foul mouths more than they could imagine. The bloodline of their history is completely expressed in the blood they drink and the meat of the desperado boss they devour. Who wonders that Christian barbarity burned innumerous human beings at the stake, committed the most execrable abominations -- except the perpetrators and their insidious schmucks wanting to be reputed the reverse they indeed are?

   Evenly the oppressed gospel of Philip produces evidence that the Christian barbarians, i.e., Jesus and his “disciples” or fellow objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy were passionate cannibals while fooling themselves to be very "moral" minded -- so false, hypocritical, mendacious and depraved they are:

"God is a man-eater. For this reason, men are sacrificed to him. Before men were sacrificed, animals were being sacrificed, since those to whom they were sacrificed were not gods."[x]

Ah, ah, ah…!

The “god” of the (Christians) cannibals is a cannibal!

The "god" of the barbarians a barbarian. The “god” of the devils Satan….

In addition, the "god" of planet Earth's most organized crime a death penalty convict canting his disgrace to the utmost (However could it be else?)!

   What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god? That is „honor“ amongst thieves or “moral” among terrorists! Everybody has a "god" of his own – and the Christian foul mouths cannibals even eat him up!

    That, what I am writing here, could be refuted at the easiest, if somebody could provide evidence that a Satan's sect ever would behave basically different with the Christian ones. That is already impossible to do, because rivals or competitors never can outdo Christian sects pertaining to crimes, felonies, outrages and barbarities.

   Let's put the due questions:

·       Would Satan ever "love" else than Jesus and the Christian foul mouths do?

·       Would Satan ever "unify" himself with his adherents but by cannibalism Jesus and the Christian foul mouths are used to doing?

One reaches the conclusion that already there is such a sect: Christendo(o)m. No religious Mafia ever durably could exists without doing that, what the Christian foul mouths are used to doing: Especially because of their spite, malice, lies, deceits, crimes, felonies and outrages they would feign the "god", " morals", " truths "-- exactly what the Christian foul mouths simulate. I.e., wickedness would never succeed but by insidiousness, perfidy and infamy.

   Christian sect and its "god" Jesus "Christ" precisely match those patterns. Christendo(o)m that is almost the perfect crime and therefore it cannot be outdone by any other evil.

    That is the "religion", in which Satan or Satan's son or just a devilish rogue, man's deceiver, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ" ) has become "god"...

   Like Jesus Satan would say: I eat and I have to be eaten. This carcass the Christian foul mouths call Eucharist...!

   Barbarian and cannibal Jesus "Christ" likes to unify with his own cannibalistic kind. Say this comfort the depraved and all the felons that exist...!

Thirdly: What is honor among thieves or rogues' moral?

    Honor among thieves or rogues' moral is the result of a bad conscience that is reproaching to the objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, i.e. "the sick needing a physician" (Lu 5:31) being scum of the earth... Therefore, they suddenly develop – comparably to lunatics - on tiny selected sectors somewhat “moral” behavior, that they, so-to-speak, overall ruthlessly are used to trampling underfoot.

   Normally, thieves or rouges act according the maxim that everything is just a means to an end. So, the thieves and terrorists suffer a bad conscience that is reproaching to them being just a piece of crap.

Thus, desperadoes now develop one, separated tiny “islands” within their ocean of depravity, in which they play the “moral“ , for example, that one doesn't stab the rival or enemy cowardly from behind but openly give battle or that one may not fight woman etc.

   However, the rouges ‘or thieves’ general ruthless behavior makes a mockery of those principles. For instance, in the first crusade the Christian foul mouths massacred - without any exception - the entire population of the city of Antiochus and Jerusalem within only few days.

   Those were about 50.000 human beings. The drains of sewage system of these cities could absorb all the blood of the Christian foul mouths’ outrage, not at all. The Christian cannibals murdered everybody: Men, women, children, infants, the pregnant, the elderly, sick persons, the dying, the rich or the pauper, mendicants, invalid or the handicapped, even Christian fellows of those cities etc., because they did not want to share their hereby cribbed new properties even with their Christian fellows in both cities.

   Paintings are demonstrating that during the crusades the Christian foul mouths indeed ate up their enemies, preferably the Muslims. So, Christian cannibalism is not only done symbolically. More over, there is a theory of "transubstantiation", in particular, in Catholic sect, i.e., that Christian foul mouths do not only symbolically but really ate up Satan or his son Jesus "Christ" !!

However, sometimes there is even honor among thieves, psycho-terrorists, murderers and terrorists – and Christian cannibals, anyway! The Christian foul mouths always claim to be moral whoppers, don't they? Crusading Christian cannibals took along military hospitals, for example, in which they “of course” cared for sick persons and the handicapped.

   While slaughtering women, innocent children, elderly, the sick, the handicapped etc., the Christian cannibals cared for a few elderly, sick and the handicapped they took along from Europe for the crusade.

o That is honor among thieves!

o Those are Christian "morals"!

o Those are the variants of Christian foul mouths' perfidy!

    What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god? Do you still doubt that there can be honor among thieves and rouges? There can be honor among thieves and terrorists and among Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy and cannibals, anyway!

Also in other sense, the Christian foul mouths insist on honor among thieves or rogues' moral. Hardly other bipeds or human beings have unmasked themselves being that murderers and mass-murderers like the Christian foul mouths are doing. However, these thieves and/or desperadoes have their "honor" or moral faking.

o Do not they fight - by the way like rogue Hitler and his fellow desperadoes - against the abortion, if necessary with guns?

o And do not they have a crazy "honor " if it is about biotechnology, for example, embryos?

   Those are the places they give themselves air in order to compensate their dark mind and avert attention from their depraved, yes, and even murderous traits and last not least, deceive themselves. The worse the conscience of objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy, the more they are used to faking "morals".

   The Christian foul mouths name that thieves’ or terrorists’ honor "charity". That is why Christian (cannibal) sect mostly looks like a mental disease because it is a typical case of rogues' moral and honor or moral of thieves or terrorists that it usually looks like insanity or a lunatic asylum.

     And even Jesus ‘washing of his disciples’ feet is a typical case of honor or moral among thieves or terrorists. That spiteful creature that had fallen ill with megalomania (“All authority on earth and in heaven is given to me”, “heaven and earth will pass but not my word”) who even fancied being a "god", is faking a humble servant he himself never believe in…

    From the outset and in principal the Christian megalomaniac is used to shamming servility.

   Similarly, the popes and Christian swineherds used to behaving according to the principles of honor or morals among thieves or terrorists. Evenly Christian barbarians' "love“ or “charity” is just an emanation of honor or moral among thieves or terrorists.

    As already mentioned, the psychological reasons for honor or moral among thieves or terrorists is the awareness of moral depravity reproached by the conscience of one’s own. By those "honor "or "moral" among thieves or terrorists the concerned want to withstand their bad conscience.

     The thieves and desperadoes deadly believe in their crazy honor or morals. Therefore, one is running the risk even getting murdered by them when deriding their funny and foolish behavior.

     The bad conscience, e.g., is reproaching to the thieves or rouges: You are a nasty, filthy, depraved and spiteful creature. And the objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy try withstanding their bad conscience: No, I am not – look, yesterday, I helped a disabled one crossing the street.

    However, moral quality of human being does not depend on hospital services and even not on any medical care or any other job's activity. Morals are not that, what one is doing, it is the way one is it doing. Otherwise, e.g., a physician would be the most moral individual, what is not the case.

That “charity” and “love” the Christian cannibals "love" one another was accurately described by Roman emperor Julian (332 – 363 C.E.),

„I have experienced that even carnivores are not hostile minded on human beings like Christian foul mouths against each other!“ [xi]

   What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god? That is what the world looks like if thieves and terrorists lay claims on morals.

As already mentioned, Muhammad says that god’s goodness, grace and mercy are infinite and do not require any rogues' honor, rogues' love, rogues' customs, bloodshed, bloodsucking or even any cannibalism, eating the flesh of a gangster boss. The Christian way of thinking is typical of rogues' moral.

   Muhammad's way of thinking is that one of willing and good people, as Jesus himself acknowledged in the contrast with his adherents (Christians) as the following one: The healthy do not need the doctor but the sick persons, i.e., the Christian foul mouths and the rogues.

   Crucifixion and Communion are real manifestation of such Christian sickness, i.e., rogues' honor! "Crucifixion of Christ" that is "salvation" how "the sick needing a doctor" (verbatim Jesus "Christ" ) fancy redemption of their selves! Basically, by "crucifixion" and the last meal (cannibal communion) the Christian foul mouths' trail of blood, i.e., the outrages and barbarities of this sect, is already designed.

      By means of that idea of "crucifixion" and last meal, an astute psychological expert immediately can recognize and predict the history of this barbaric Christian sect with all its spite, maliciousness, outrages, atrocities and barbarities. The hardest evidence that pertaining to Christian sect it is about a rogues' and barbarians' one, is provided by:

1. The jerky idea of crucifixion ,

2. Cannibalism of last meal (cannibal communion) and

3. The theoretical reflection how a deceiver' and Mafiosi ever would be and would behave and the fact that Christendo(o)m is the corresponding reality to those (theoretical) patterns.

    However, the fact, that only a few people are up to the Christian foul mouths' tricks, lies, deception and perfidy, does not mean that the latter does not exist... Otherwise, the Christian deceivers would not be that successful.

   In his drama „Die Räuber“ (The robbers) German poet Friedrich of Schiller (1759 –1805 C.E.) makes the character Karl Moor saying the following: „One can be mistaken - believe me, one can deem that to be strength of spirit, what in the end is despair, however. “ [xii]

   All thieves or terrorists that foster honor or morals just are used to confusing superiority (of them) with desperation they are driven because of their depravity. Not better “ideology” -- i.e., “sacraments”, “doctrines”, and chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") -- of Christian cannibals' sect ever could be described as the German poet does it, here.

   Such self-deceptions of “confusing“ spiritual strength with abysmal imbecility, yes abomination -- as described by outstanding German poet Schiller - especially come into existence if terrorists, murderers and barbarians set "moral" standards for societies, what is more or less the case in all occidental countries.

   Here, not by chance but inevitably "honor" and/or "morals" amongst thieves or terrorists are confused with „divine mysteries “, because thieves, terrorists, creeps n' crooks do not and will not getting rid of their nasty, messy, filthy as depraved selves when trying to play great philosophers...

Jesus is a model to study it.

What else one ever could expect from a sect of the accursed of god, accursed like Satan is accursed by god?

Ugh, Christian foul mouths, ugh!

PREVIOUS | HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS| NEWS | THE CROSS DECEPTION | CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRIST | WHAT DID JESUS LOOK LIKE? | THE (STOLEN) STAR OF BETHLEHEM | MY STUFF |NEXT |

© 2002 HANS HENNING ATROTT - All rights reserved. - Reproduction only for private use and/or purposes of studying and archiving by research and library institutes - otherwise without permission strictly prohibited. This site is still under construction.

Annotations:

[i] Quoted from M.J. Vermaseren, Mithras, the Secret God, London (Chatto &Windus) 1963, p 104

[ii] Joh 6:53 NRSV

[iii] The Gospel of Thomas, NHC, Logion 7, Translated by Thomas O. Lambdin, on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html

[iv] Koran, Yusuf Ali Edition of 1935, Sure 4:157

[v] See: http://www.yeshu.net/

[vi] The Book of Thomas the Contender, Translated by John D. Turner, http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/bookt.html

[vii] See: H. Lincoln, M. Baigent, R.Leigh, Das Vermächtnis des Messias, Bergisch Gladbach 1987, S. 67 (English: The Messianic legacy). I refer to the German edition

[viii] The gospel of Thomas, ibid.

[ix] ACTS OF JOHN, From "The Apocryphal New Testament", M.R. James-Translation and Notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924, Scanned and Edited by Joshua Williams, Northwest Nazarene College, 1995, § 95 http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/noncanon/acts/actjohn.htm

[x] The Gospel of Philip, translated into English by Wesley W. Isenberg, on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html:

[xi] Kurt Eggers, der Kaiser der Römer gegen den König der Juden – Aus den Schriften Julians, des Abtrünnigen, Berlin 1941, S. 63, Translated from the German of my own.

[xii] Friedrich von Schilder, die Räuber, (The Robers), III,2 Translation from the German of my own, German original text: „Man kann sich täuschen- glaube mir, man kann das für Stärke des Geistes halten, was am Ende doch Verzweiflung ist.“ In his poem about Rousseau this outstanding poet called Christendo(o)m an insanity governing the world...