Jesus' posing as „God“, „God’s son“, God’s Father, "Prophet", "human being" etc.

Chapter: 1, Part: 6

Evidence of Jesus' Deceits, Depravity, Megalomania and Satanism

The difficulties of Jesus "Christ" to accomplish his delusion of grandeur

Jesus' posing as „God“, „God’s son“, God’s Father, "Prophet", "human being" etc.

This file is also available as PDF, ZIP and WORD.EXE

^1stly:     Jesus is no „god“ but expressively human being

^2ndly:    Jesus is no associate of god of equal (god’s) nature („son of god“)

^3rdly:    Jesus is not only „god“ (in place of god)) but a sort of superior “god” or god’s guardian

4^thly:   Jesus is god (instead of god) what the Christian foul players are used to faking as „god’s son“

^5thly: Jesus is not even a Messiah but just an apostle, high priest, advocate or comforter

^6thly: Jesus is father – not „son of god“

7thly: Only swank of an accursed one by god (De 21:23)

8thly: Jesus Christ Satan as described by prophet Isaiah

9thly: Summary

Introduction: Jesus Christ’s early scruples faking to be good and „god“

Here, we are going to demonstrate that Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") provides evidence of all points of views about his nature, viz, if he is „god“, not god or only rabbi or if he is superior, inferior or equal to “god”. The one Christian that is stabbing the other Christians because the latter does not consent Jesus „Christ“ to be „god“ evenly can refer to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) and the Christian “New Testament” as the stabbed one contradicting it.

First, the fact that Christians „god’s word“ provides „evidence“ for all those points of view, i.e., for the one and its contrary, debunks first Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera and his   Christian desperadoes ("sinners" unparalleled felony of deceit. Secondly this unveils that – at least in the beginning -- Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) had to suffer scruples perpetrating humankind’s most and most abominable crime.

This paragraph also is part of chapter 1 starting with the evidence that the instigator of this organized crime is bragging about his skills of deceiving. In the second paragraph of this chapter: 1 we produce evidence that Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, aka Jesus "Christ" suffered from his bad conscience reproaching the abomination of his perpetrations to him. That situation of an inner war is related by the alleged encounter of Yehoshua (Jesus) with Satan in the desert.

As we point out in the second paragraph of this chapter, the encountering of his with Satan in the desert depicts a dream of Yehoshua (alias: Jesus „Christ“) he dreamt that intensively that he could not differ between dream and reality. In this dream, his bad conscience reproaches to him (Jesus) that he (Jesus) is the devil of imagination of his own. His conscience is reproaching to him that in seizing all “kingdoms of the world” (Christian jargon) he gives up all truthfulness, morals, love etc.

This shows the gravity about his war on his own conscience, at least in the outset of his deceiving. This dream demonstrates that he is on the defensive: It is not me (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera or Jesus "Christ"); I (Jesus) am not this unscrupulous one. That is another one! That is Satan becoming an unprincipled bastard when bagging all kingdoms of the world.

However, such a situation is only dreamt because the bad conscience reproaches to him (Jesus) being Satan of the imagination of his. Otherwise, such a dream would not come into existence. The rest of the story is how he (Jesus) represses the truths about himself.

In a similar way, the “arguments” (quotations) he delivered for different points of view about his nature are to understand. E.g., when asking:

Mr 10:18 NKJV

18 So Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me (Jesus "Christ") good? No one is good but One, that is, God.” -

he was suffering from scruples to call himself good (shepherd), not to mention to pose as „god“. Here god is told to be one and not three and because he is differing between himself and god, he does not belong to god (as a part). Here he says that the desperado is saying that he is no god and not good. He is completely right since no desperado is good but an insidious foul player, in a sheep's clothing of "morals". Later, he obviously repressed those scruples when blathering:

Mt 28:18 NRSV

18 And Jesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me (Jesus "Christ").

This quotation does not only mean that he was an associate or shareholder (“son”) of god but that he was “god” instead of god. The one who is keeping or faking to keep “all authority in heaven and on earth” that one is “god” and nobody else. Viz, at least in the beginning Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (alias: Jesus „Christ“) had scruples to pretend and to boast to be „god“ or to be shareholder („son“) of „god“.

Scruples obviously aroused more when he was facing educated Pharisees and less when he blathered to credulous ones. Those scruples once more provide evidence of an inner war on the conscience of his. The latter impressively expressed by pictures to him to be Satan of his and his fellow desperadoes’ (Christians’) imagination.

There is no god suffering from a bad conscience. This is additional evidence that Christians worship Satan, respectively, his son as "god“...

There is no god wanting to be pitied by beings inferior to him. This is additional evidence that Christians worship Satan, respectively, his as "god“...

That is why this paragraph is part of chapter 1.

Firstly:  Jesus expressively is no „god“ but human being

Joh 8:40 (NRSV)

40 but now you are trying to kill me (Jesus), a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God.

I (Jesus) was human being. This –- precisely this – is what the “god” of Christian foul players’ sect says about himself. That is what the instigator of Christian foul mouths’ and foul players’ sect says about himself if scruples of his are strong enough to keep him to the truths!

Here, he differs between human being (himself) and god. Once more, his scruples are establishing its place. In this case, he keeps to the truths instead of playing an impostor and living delusion of grandeur to the full, viz, palming himself off as “god” on the victims of his deceits. What honest one sincerely ever could contest that at least in the beginning Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) suffered from scruples committing his crime of posing as “god”?

One should think it over: Millions of individuals are tormented, tortured and massacred by Christian foul players (desperadoes) because they say that this instigator of Christian organized crime („religion“), i.e., Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) was a human being. On top of everything: he calls himself like the murdered ones called him. More over, bear in mind that Christian torturers und murderers desire to be called „god“, pardon, “good shepherds” and even „martyrs“… Even in Christian desperadoes’ countries of today, whoever does not comply with that is running the risk of being kidnapped, respectively, jailed by Christian desperadoes.

I see, in contrast with Christian doctrines allegedly „infallible“ Christian „god’s word“ witnesses that this unique specimen of instigator of Christian sect is a human being (and no god)! I see, he (Jesus) calls himself to be a human being according to the “infallible” Christians’ “god’s word”, pardon, desperadoes’ word.

Indeed, it is about the individual that otherwise is palmed off as associate or shareholder (the latter is the meaning of „son“) of “god”. I see, the “god” of Christian foul mouths and foul players calls himself to be a human being. The only matter that is to object is that more precisely he rather should had named himself an inhuman being or monstrosity.

Christians’ “infallible” „god’s word“ – allegedly delivering sham-authorization for desperadoes with lust for power to exalt themselves as „shepherds“ over individuals humiliated to be their subservient animals (“sheep”) -- calls him no „god” but just a human being… Baer in mind, this “god” that allegedly „authorized“ all those Christians’ barbarities and other sorts of foul mouth and foul play of theirs on humankind and humanity …!

Whoever, oh yeah, whoever doubts that in Christian desperadoes’ sect “wonders” happen, all over and all the time…

That is nothing unusual! Obviously, sometimes even the most felons have to suffer from scruples! That Christian(s) („martyrs“) torture and murdered millions of human beings because the latter said that what even Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) told, viz, that he is a human being, is nothing new for true-blue desperadoes or foul players, i.e., Christians.    Desperadoes of the Christian stamp know that they know everything better than their “god” does, anyway. Especially they know everything better than their “god” does, if it is about grift and subreption of sham-legitimation to reign and hence abasing   their fellow human beings to be subservient sheep to them! Finally, desperadoes’ and other foul players’ faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and blathering that is fobbed off as “god’s word”, anyway!

What matters to Christian foul players, desperadoes and Mafiosi is how to exalt themselves as “shepherds” and humiliate everybody else to be their subservient sheep… Everything else, e.g., “god”, “truths”, “god’s word”, “love” and “morals” is to subordinate and to cant according the megalomania and foul play.

In addition, he is no god when referring to Psalm 82:6-7

Joh 10:31 -35 RSV

31 The Jews took up stones again to stone him.

32 Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these do you stone me?"

33 The Jews answered him, "It is not for a good work that we stone you but for blasphemy; because you, being a man, make yourself God."

34 Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your law, 'I said, you are gods'?

35    If he called them gods to whom the word of God came (and scripture cannot be broken),

36    do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, 'You are blaspheming,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God'?

Here, Jesus is referring to Psalm 82:6-7 and faking that the “son of god” is no unearthly, supernatural feature of one unique person but a common attribute of each priest. Allegedly, therefore, each priest can call himself not only “son of god” but also "god" himself... Here, nobody is a component of a “god”, e.g., of “trinity”, but each priest is a god of his own…

Therefore, claiming to be a god in this sense does not mean being master of humankind or slaveholder what otherwise is demanded, e.g., when he is alleging: “All authority on Earth and heaven is given to me”. In view of so many “gods”, all those numerous “authorities” of “gods” would bump into each other, sonly.

Among so many “gods”, the same would happen what is used to occurring among Christian sects: They would try wiping out each other. Furthermore, in this case if simulating Jesus really had thought so, he would have behaved quite snotty towards personages that are “gods”, as he tries bamboozling us.

If Christian sects understand the notion of "god” –so far one can admit a notion of god to this heinous sect -- in this manner, as Jesus is lying and pretending here, then its " three-parted" polytheism (“trinity ") would thus inadvertently be proven as an absolute stupidity, unless one has to say that Jesus here himself already unmasks Christian „trinity“ as sheer deception.

He and his infamous schmucks (Christian desperadoes) pretend exclusivity (of the “son of god” as one of three constituents (father, son and holy spirit) of “god “(equally natured beings) and besides them there are no gods but inferior beings. i.e., Jesus flagrantly lies to the Pharisees in order to get out of them. However, while deceiving that way he inadvertently admits his

a)     his defeat and

b)     his complete deception towards the Pharisees.

“God’s” son thus turns out to be man’s deceiver! Because by calling all the other priests „gods“, he admits not believing in a unique god that is three parted (“trinity”). This is what he exactly and inadvertently unveils to the Pharisees. He and his insidious schmucks pretend his exclusivity as constituent ("son”) of “god” and there shall be nothing more divine but these three components: father, son and holy spirit.

Here, he refutes that “trinity“ and thus uncovers it as sheer deceit to the Pharisees, since he claims to call himself “god” not because of any exclusivity (e.g., “son of god” or similar stupidity) but because he is a priest, too.

The concepts of “immaculate conception”, “salvation” and “redeemer” that are cribbed from the rival of Mithraic-Religion only serve Jesus' intent of exalting himself. Jesus lies to his partners in the talks, because he does not claim to be “god”, because he is a real or conceited ordinary priest but because he is faking to be" redeemer“, “savoir“, “vicarious suffering” and similar nonsense. Jesus deceives, once more1

Yes, because to other partners in talks and another time he argues a reverse way why he claims to be a “god” or “god’s son” and all the other deceitful contrivances (e.g., to be “redeemer“, “savoir“, “vicarious suffering“ and therefore a god but not because he is a priest!). He lies either here or there.   Here, Jesus turns out to be a proven, brazen liar, because he normally always assumes that only one individual can be „god's son” and not each (piggy?) priest as he is claiming here.

Otherwise he simulates that „god's son is a type of junior boss to whom „god“ allegedly has passed all authority on Earth, cosmos, universe and heaven, that is to say that„god“ is proclaimed having retired in favor of this would-be “god”. Mendaciously Jesus deceives the Jewish partners in his talks and more over he is  infamous enough to project the defect of the traits of his own on his opponents or his rivals by calling the other ones (not himself) being liars.

Lu10:22 RSV

22 All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, or who the Father is except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him."

Mt 28:18 RSV

Mt 28:18 And Jesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

To his Jewish partners in the talks the swindler (Jesus) lies that the term of "god’s son" was just an ornamental title for preachers, while in Luke 10:22 he claims that this means having got exclusively all the power of the universe and consequently being the unique ruler of the universe instead of the god, who now is called (retired) father (in heaven).

"God's son" is a contrivance of Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy in order to get rid of the “god” by dismissing him as retired "father", so that the upper hoodlum and terrorist of the Christian) sect Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, aka Jesus "Christ" , can sham the “god". That is from what mendacious Jesus "Christ" once more deceitfully is diverting.

Lu 4:6 RSV

6 and (Satan) said to him, "To you I will give all this authority and their glory; for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will.

How closely the words of Jesus and that ones of Satan resemble each other and that according to the doctrines of his own, so far one can speak about doctrines pertaining to this scrap and crap! Jesus does what Satan modeled to him in the desert. When Jesus said that he and the father are one, then here is the evidence that Satan is the father.

Both are fancying the same “power” of keeping the keys on earth and in heaven and to pass it on to those that worship them as the “god”. Whoever wants to deny that they are one? To me Satan never proffered to encounter. Why does Satan meet Jesus? Because bird of a feather flock together!

Truly, it seems that according to Jesus’ opinion Satan pretends having got all authority in heaven and on earth and that he is able to pass it on as he arbitrarily like to do it…Thus Jesus debunks himself being a liar and deceiver comparable to Satan's depravity and this all turns out according to the standards of his own!

In order to proceed let us state Jesus and Satan consent that all authority can be handed over arbitrarily to someone, in return for being worshiped as the god. Whereas the god of the (Jewish) bible never is willing to pass his authority to some one else, even not to a would-be god, co-“god” or underdog, pardon, under god that wants to dismiss him as (old retired) father and replace him as alleged son, i.e., new boss:

Isa 42:8 RSV

48 I am the LORD, that is my name; my glory I give to no other, nor my praise to graven images. ...

Alas, who is the Lord in Christian sect? Oh yes, Christian, answer the question: Who is the Lord in your sect? God? No! It is the Christian desperadoes’ upper hoodlum, desperado and terrorist: Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, gang name: Jesus "Christ“! If you do not believe it, go in a Christian toilet (“church”) and listen to those suckers of sewage! That means the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy try abolishing the “god” by replacing him by a fellow swine of their own with the gang name: Jesus "Christ“!

Therefore, evidently Jesus likewise Satan, provided both are not the same, transfers honor, glory, authority and power as business in return to those that worshiped them as “god”, for instance. This, Jesus even does in favor of Peter, the serial killer, who killed several human beings, among others early Christian community members, Ananias and Saphira (see: Ac. 5:1-11)and committed perjury several times (see Mt 26,71).

However, he worships Satan, Pardon, and Jesus "Christ" as the god. That is what counts…! Even the Christian pope terrorist claim this "counterfeit money” they are used to calling “powers of keys” passed on from Jesus to Peter and from allegedly to them – and most pope terrorists were still worse murderers than Peter.

Mt 16:19 RSV

19 I (Jesus) will give you (Peter) the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Oh yes, the main, the only thing that counts is that Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ" is worshiped as the "god”. For that, Jesus gives you all his counterfeit money like Satan model edit to him, before. Oh yes, oh yes: Precisely as Satan modeled it to Jesus he does it likewise towards his submitted creep n’ crooks.

Obviously Satan authorized him to do so, when both encountered in the desert in order to enter a pact and deliberated how to recruit creeps n’ crooks the easiest way. Of course, Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy deny having entered a pact with Satan.

However, Christian, do use your brain: Supposed, Jesus and Satan entered a pact: Would Jesus and his perfidious schmucks ever admit having done so, would they? Of course, you Christian can answer: Yes, our Jesus would have done it to those “who are poor in spirit” (Mt 5.3), because you can lead all the weak-minded up the garden path…

Anyway, it is very conspicuous that the misdeeds of Jesus very resemble much those ones of Satan as Jesus himself describes them but not those ones of the “god” as prophet Isaiah describes the behavior of “god”. In addition, to prophet Isaiah Jesus and the Christian desperadoes
are used to referring when trying to produce evidence that Jesus allegedly is the predicted Messiah.

Those “keys” are the “counterfeit money” of Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ" and all the deceitful Christian creeps n’ crooks. This "counterfeit money” is the “currency “ of all the Christian religious rogues, of the scum of the earth.

The god of the Bible the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy degrade as “Old Testament“ keeps his omnipotence and is not willing to become depended on decisions of others, especially on perjurers, knifers, criminals, felons, murderers, mass-murderers, barbarians and the scum of the earth and on the "poor ones in spirit” other morons that presume to decide instead of him (god)...

Cross my heart: That is the best protection against abuse of god’s will, in particular, against all the lies, deception, perjuries, crimes, barbarities, mass-murders, genocide and other abominations of the Christian swineherds' sects!

God as prophet Isaiah – the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy wrongly and falsely refer to – tells us about his management is right, however Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy just want a business: You worship me Satan or Jesus) as the god and I (Satan or Jesus) give you a lot of “counterfeit money” of alleged „god's" authority by which you can enslave your conspecifics subservient to yourself… Moreover, both, Satan and Jesus, stop at nothing in order to succeed that way...!

Once more it becomes clear that nobody but Jesus himself provided ideological „arguments“ for each point of view a Christian might have about the question as what he (Jesus) shall pose in his sect (e.g., “god”, schmuck of priest, advocate etc.) . Hence, Jesus himself cared  for all the stabbing, blinding or prying of his Christian perfidious schmucks.

Thus, Jesus has taken care that everyone can refer to him: The one that is stabbing because the other one does not consent with him about the “true“ nature of man’s deceiver (Jesus "Christ") and even the one that is stabbed or burned, because he or she contradicts those views.

The last mentioned quotation produces evidence that Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ“, indeed exalted himself to the “god” and lied. The liar and deceiver just is accomplishing his true depraved nature: Telling lies to conspecifics and deceiving them for the advantage of his own:

Mr 10:18 RSV

18 And Jesus said to him," Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.

“Become better than I (Jesus am); make yourselves like the son of the Holy Spirit."[ii]

Conspicuously,   alleged aprocryphe chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") and the "canonized" ones correspond one another!

Oh yes, oh yes -- you Christian desperadoes , that is the first and best advice that can be given to you from your idol: Become better than this religious rogue, hoodlum and terrorist Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ“, you worship as “god” in place of god:

·       Jesus himself is advising that to you.

·     Jesus himself knows it: He is not good.

·       Since when Satan is good?

·    Oh yes, oh yes, listen you wretched Christian desperadoes : Your gangster boss or gangster “god” is saying that!

It is exclusive Christian sect’s hunger for power to condition conspecifics to become their slaves that keep them from taking note of all the contradictions Jesus told about himself and what the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy call “doctrines” or “tenets”.

Christian sects want to disguise their disgraceful enslaving of humankind as a reputed will of Satan, Pardon, “god", to which they are used to simulating to have submitted “humbly” and "modestly”. That is why they are interested in picturing Jesus as far as possible as a “god”, oh yes, instead of the god.

However, even here they do not deprave their topmost fellow swine Jesus) in no way, who indirectly admitted that he contrived and fabricate that all in order to the reign the conspecifics, i. e., to make subservient slaves for oneself:

“Know, therefore, that he healed you when you were ill, in order that you might reign.” [iii]

Reigning, reigning, reigning, i.e., making slaves subservient to oneself, prostrating before oneself and knuckling under oneself! That is what „honorable“ Christian „faith“ is for, camouflaged by the mask of each reverse: „Humbleness“, „modesty“ etc., in order to get victims inattentive! That is what it is about -- it only is about! Those “nice” concepts of “god”, “truth”, “morals”, „ethics”, „miracles“,„revelations“, „god’s word“, „holy spirit“ etc., etc., etc. are only contrivances of the atheist Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") to domineer over the morons, jerks, duffers, mugs, creeps n’ crooks making them slaves, knuckling under him and inducing them to kiss the rings of unscrupulous Christian rogues and religious Mafiosi.

Therefore, Jesus' insidious schmucks (the Christian desperadoes) always tried massacring everybody, who was able to debunk their infamous, barbaric and terrorist hunger for power, deceit and enslavement of humankind.

The last quotations are sayings, for which Jesus - after a certain "doctrine " had been established by Christian councils and enforced by slaughtering and murdering those, who opposed them -- today immediately would be denounced heretic or any permission of Christian teaching would be withdrawn from him. Yes, today Jesus would have to reckon with even excommunication from the sect that adulates him as "god".

In the Middle Ages, his Christian infamous schmucks certainly would have burnt him at the stake for telling the he – the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “god” – is not good but bad, so that he just can advise everybody to become better than he is... Oh yes, Mafiosi are used to behaving tough, even towards the infamous schmucks of their own!

Whoever should claim this pertaining to the “moral” quality of the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “god“ (that Jesus is not good) in a secret encounters of Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy should be glad when escaping with his life, even today…

According to our quotation from Mk 10:18 and the following we quoted from the Apocryphon of James, Jesus is no “god” by distinguishing between himself and the “god” and by rejecting being good, at all.

Whoever could not consent with him that the first thing a human being has to be, is to be better than a liar, deceiver, desperado and terrorist that names himself “god” or an associate of “god” (“god’s son”), and otherwise on top of everything venomously defamed everyone that is better than he – like his insidious schmucks are still used to doing it today–as a Pharisee? Whoever could oppose that correct self-knowledge of man's deceiver?

2ndly:Jesus is no associate of god equal (god’s) nature („son of god“) when disseminating:

Joh 20:17 RSV

17 Jesus said to her, "Do not hold me, for I (Jesus) have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brethren and say to them, I (Jesus) am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God."

Joh. 14: 28 RSV

28 ¶ You heard me say to you, 'I go away, and I will come to you.' If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.

   If Jesus was god and there is still above Jesus another god, than the Christian desperadoes' ("sinners'") "god" still has a god above himself. Then, the father is to Jesus god like god is god to all human being without Christianity. That means, that in Christendo(o)m human beings are dehumanized and abased to the level of animals, so that there is only one human being ("man's son" or man's deceiver) that is superior to all his conspecifics like human beings are superior to animals (without Jesus' or the Christian desperadoes' insanity).

In order to fake Jesus superior to all his fellow human beings the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy in truth fake him to be the only human being ("man's son", respectively man's deceiver) and that means that all other human beings are like animals to the god. Furthermore, a "god" that still has another god, is no god -- not to speak about equals to god -- at best a monster of human being because he his not almighty, since being depended on the superior god.

     That means, primarily Jesus does not lift up himself to the "god" but at first abases or degrades all his fellow human being (conspecifics) to be like animals in order to fake the only human being ("man's son", pardon, man's deceiver). That is what the matter about god and human beings look like if Mafiosi are romping about the subject of religion and god...

Denying the access to god of any individuals, in fact the Christian claim Jesus to be the only human beings that has access to the god above him and thus they cut off all human beings from god. (That alleged unique access of Jesus to the god is the "counterfeited money" of the Christian desperadoes .

    Therefore, by naming Jesus the "god" the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy make all their fellow human beings animals, slaves and robots submitted to their will to power. Thus Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy fake to be supermen and vilify, slander, libel by degrading all their, oh yes, so "beloved" fellow human being to be subhuman creatures. Jesus pretends having that access to the god each human being has without his (Jesus') and the Christian insanity.

Therefore, the Christian desperadoes' ("sinners'") power is based on dehumanization of humankind. Without Jesus and his perfidious Christian folks human beings have all those features the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy exclusively claim for Jesus in order to enslave their conspecifics submitted to their will. In addition, with regard to the Christian desperadoes' ("desperadoes' ("sinners'") dehumanization, do you really wonder about all the Christian savageness, fierce, depravity, crimes, felonies, atrocities, barbarities and abomination?

This sect makes human beings more depraved than higher developed animals are! Whoever can doubt that the aims of the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are the Middle Ages with all their Christian savageness, outrages, atrocities and other abominations?

     Here, let us ignore that at least once the megalomaniac hoodlum allows god to be greater than himself --this dwarfish deformity. You don’t believe it but it is true: There are still some contesting "modesty" and "humility" of man’s deceiver... Oh no, these „stubborn hearts“...!



     In views of the allegations that the "father" and the "son" are of equal nature, how is it possible that one (equal!) component (of the "god"), e.g., the father, is greater than the other, e.g., the son?

1^st question: How can two thing be equal if the one (father) is superior to the other (son)?

Answer: While lying and deceiving, two parts that are different can be completely equal and even the same! When lying and deceiving, all things are possible that are otherwise impossible (see Mt 17:20). Lies and deceptions even shift mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and the truths anyway! Lie and deceit have "truths" of their own.

2^nd question: What is the “truth” of lie and deceit?

Answer: Providing lie and deception with the reputation of truths and truthfulness. Those are the “truth” of lie, deception, Jesus and all the Christian desperadoes , hoodlums and Mafiosi!

Therefore, there are always" miracles" over "miracles" a necessary concomitant of deceit, because by means of wonders lies should be pose as “truths” in place of truths. Wonders shall replace the truths in the brains of birdbrains, cerebellums, and weak-minded, psychically or mentally ill ones. That is why:

Mt 5:3 RSV ¶

3 "Blessed are the poor in spirit…

Because they can be bamboozled at the easiest, can’t they?

If the one is inferior to the other but it is claimed that both are “gods”, then it is about polytheism of several “gods” that are differently ranked – regardless, if the Christian Mafiosi perjure the truths about their toilet-religion or not!:

“The Father does not need me (Jesus). For a father does not need a son, but it is the son who needs the father.“ iv

Mr 15:34 RSV

And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice…"My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

Oh my goodness, now the superior “god” is leaving the inferior one… Oh no, what a fine friend god is…! This mischief happens, although the inferior “god” Jesus wants the be superior to the “father god”…   How times are deteriorating more and more –and the “god” evenly is no longer that he once had been…

In both last quotations, Jesus admits that the father doesn't need the son, however the son the father. Here, once more the megalomaniac one very, very “generously admits his inferiority to the "god". The father doesn't need the son, but there is no the son without father... Whoever, except Christian religious Mafiosi, ever could dare to contradict?

Once more, one can realize that Jesus provided all his Christian sects that venomously denounce and fight one another about the question of what nature their topmost desperado, hoodlum and terrorist is, with corresponding "ammunition" for their stabbing, blinding and stakes …? Don’t they claim that Jesus “loves” each of them…?

He Jesus once more is no "god“ by differing between himself and the god now is able to decide and act without his (Jesus’) permission, like every „sensible “human being distinguishes between itself on the on hand, and god and/or “god’s” decisions on the other.

If Jesus was “god”, then, in this case, he should had put the question the following way: Me, faithless god, why did I leave myself? However, why does an omnipotent, omniscient “god” has to put such questions and does not know it. Putting questions produces evidence of a lack of knowledge and thus that there is no “god” but deceit!

“Lack is the cause of any movement (Aristotle)” and questioning is caused by ignorance… Therefore, a questioning “god” is just a (n ignorant) deceiver…! If “god” leaves himself he is no god any longer but human being, animal, plant, perhaps Satan or Jesus because Satan also is lacking of knowledge and thus has to question.

When Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy allege pertaining to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ")
„true“ „god“ and „true" human being they evenly can speak of „truthful“ lies, what Clement of Alexandria seems to do in his letter pertaining to “The Secret Gospel of Mark”. [v] Why "truthful" lie? Because lies -- like those ones of Jesus "Christ" and his Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy -- consist of two parts: Firstly, falseness in the matter (semantics) and secondly, its reputation as truth.

Therefore for them, each lie always is “true truth” (Clemens of Alexandria). Therefore, the one is the reputation and the other its being. (There is no lie without claiming truths!). Likewise, the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy also can say: True “god” and true spiteful little devil... or true “man’s son” and true snake of venom or dwarf of poison… The first one is always as what it shall be reputed and second one that what it really is. Always there are represented both part of lie and deception.

The main principle of Christian sect conspicuously coincides with the logic of all lying and deceiving: Always claiming the one and its reverse, i.e., giving a matter its reverse reputation, e.g., claiming lies and truths together by imposing lies the reputation of truths and vice versa. If„god“ supposedly can be human being, why Jesus not Satan or Satan’s son?

Summarized: According to the words of his own Jesus is no patch on god. He sometimes very, very" generously” confesses to be inferior to “god”. Therefore, never doubt on Jesus’ “humbleness” and “modesty”…

3rdly: Jesus is not only „god“ (in place of god) but a sort of superior “god” or god’s guardian

Mt 24:35 RSV

35   Heaven (and thus god) and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

Now, Jesus is putting himself above the „god“. Since “god” is a constituting part of heaven the felon and lawfully sentenced death penalty convict (Jesus "Christ") even threatens “god” to be going to perish. Some day, the alleged almighty and everlasting (!) „god“ will be dead, however the drivel of this megalomaniac desperado and terrorist will survive... Ah, ah, ah…

Don’t make me laugh…! To where the alleged immortal souls of his Christian perfidious schmucks that supposedly shall live eternally in heaven – shall go, when heaven does not exist any longer, he forgot to tell. However, he did not threaten hell to be going to perish, so that there still a place for Mrs. Robinson and all the other Christian jerks, morons or felons and barbarian:" Heaven holds a place for those who pray”, provided it still exists and if not, then hell holds a place for all the Christian liars, deceivers, bandits, murders, terrorists, barbarians!

Mt 28:18 RSV

18 And Jesus came and said to them," All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me (and thus is not to god).

So, he accepted Satan's proffer when encountering him in the desert, since Satan and no “god” had promised everything to him, in exchange being worshiped as the “god”. Where and when god shall have promised this to him, even Jesus himself forgot to mention this “important event” – as important as to forget it…

On the contrary, as we already demonstrated, prophet Isaiah – the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are used to referring vehemently when proffering their topmost felon and instigator as the “god” or an associate of the “god” -- disputes resolutely and unmistakably that god ever would share any authority of himself with somebody else.

If all authority in heaven and on earth is given to this pretending one, then evenly that one above the„god“ („father“), who in this case is a subject of him subservient to him or otherwise it is lied and a sheer deception that all authority is passed to Jesus.

If pretending Jesus has no power over the father and is unable to rule him, his authority at least is restricted and never all, i.e., just an empty boasting of a con man “impressing” his sheep, creeps n’ crooks… If Satan would have succeeded to hand over all authority to Jesus, then there would be no “god” any longer, because omnipotence is a premise of god. If Jesus pretends to be omnipotent, then nobody (even “god”) is omnipotent but Jesus. If all authority is to Jesus, then “god” is no longer almighty. The there is no god but Jesus.

·       That is the silly Christian toilet's doctrine!

·       As silly as depraved as this sect of infamy is!

If all authority is given to Jesus, then „god“ is unable to cope with the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") topmost desperado and terrorist Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" ). Don’t make me laugh…!

On that condition, the con man truly could threaten „god“ and heaven to be going to perish and that is what the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy most want: To get rid of the god by fabricating and lifting up a felon of their own as the “god”, in place of the god.

Once more, Jesus matches precisely the traits that are used to attributing to Satan according to the doctrines of monotheistic religions. As demonstrated, the devil hands over all authority for being worshiped in return. However, god is used to doing this not at all.

Thus, Jesus consequently and inadvertently – in a sense of a Freudian slip – Jesus admits that he and Satan one and the same. I also assume that evenly no authority is given to Jesus in order to prevent being called as “god” of all the spiteful little devils and suckers of sewage in the cesspool among human beings, although he pretends having all authority!

Oh Christian, you read correctly: He is unable to prevent this, although he boasts being able to do it. Remarkable is that even according to the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") doctrines, even to those ones of Jesus: Jesus thinks the same way than he and his insidious schmucks insinuate Satan to do.

1Co 15:24 RSV

24 Then comes the end, when he (Jesus) delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power (even that of god)

1Co15:28 RSV

28 When all things are subjected to him (to Jesus but not to god ), then (but not now and not before) the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things under him, that God may be everything to everyone (what he is not now).

Imagine the Christian bedlam: Jesus is not subjected to god but the "almighty" god to death penalty convict and felon Jesus "Christ" ...

God may become some day god, if Jesus generously allows him to be almighty god... More over, god is not god because Jesus makes god "to be everything to everyone", what obviously according to the Christian desperadoes' bedlam god is not now.

In addition, this means: There is no god in Christendo(o)m because if god is not complete, there is no god. Christendo(o)m is atheism fancying that the instigator of this sects (Jesus "Christ") some day will fully create the god (being everything to everyone)...

More over, there is no omnipotence of god where there is trinity. "God" is fettered in trinity and thus is no god (omnis determinatio est negatio). If god is omnipotent, then he even must be able to get rid of trinity.

Thus it is produce evidence that Christendo(o)m is a perfidious atheism because a god that in not “everything to everyone” is no god as any incomplete omnipotence does not turn out a god.