The difficulties of Jesus "Christ" to accomplish his delusion of grandeur
Jesus' posing as „God“, „God’s son“, God’s Father, "Prophet", "human being" etc.
This file is also available as PDF, ZIP and WORD.EXE
1stly: Jesus is no „god“ but expressively human being
2ndly: Jesus is no associate of god of equal (god’s) nature („son of god“)
3rdly: Jesus is not only „god“ (in place of god)) but a sort of superior “god” or god’s guardian
4thly: Jesus is god (instead of god) what the Christian foul players are used to faking as „god’s son“
5thly: Jesus is not even a Messiah but just an apostle, high priest, advocate or comforter
6thly: Jesus is father – not „son of god“
thly: Only swank of an accursed one by god (De 21:23)
8thly: Jesus Christ Satan as described by prophet Isaiah
Introduction: Jesus Christ’s early scruples faking to be good and „god“
Here, we are going to demonstrate that Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") provides evidence of all points of views about his nature, viz, if he is „god“, not god or only rabbi or if he is superior, inferior or equal to “god”. The one Christian that is stabbing the other Christians because the latter does not consent Jesus „Christ“ to be „god“ evenly can refer to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) and the Christian “New Testament” as the stabbed one contradicting it.
Click on the picture
First, the fact that Christians „god’s word“ provides „evidence“ for all those points of view, i.e., for the one and its contrary, debunks first Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera and his Christian terrorists ("sinners" unparalleled felony of deceit. Secondly this unveils that – at least in the beginning -- Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) had to suffer scruples perpetrating humankind’s most and most abominable crime.
This paragraph also is part of chapter 1 starting with the evidence that the instigator of this organized crime is bragging about his skills of deceiving. In the second paragraph of this chapter: 1 we produce evidence that Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, aka Jesus "Christ" suffered from his bad conscience reproaching the abomination of his perpetrations to him. That situation of an inner war is related by the alleged encounter of Yehoshua (Jesus) with Satan in the desert.
As we point out in the second paragraph of this chapter, the encountering of his with Satan in the desert depicts a dream of Yehoshua (alias: Jesus „Christ“) he dreamt that intensively that he could not differ between dream and reality. In this dream, his bad conscience reproaches to him (Jesus) that he (Jesus) is the devil of imagination of his own. His conscience is reproaching to him that in seizing all “kingdoms of the world” (Christian jargon) he gives up all truthfulness, morals, love etc.
This shows the gravity about his war on his own conscience, at least in the outset of his deceiving. This dream demonstrates that he is on the defensive: It is not me (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera or Jesus "Christ"); I (Jesus) am not this unscrupulous one. That is another one! That is Satan becoming an unprincipled bastard when bagging all kingdoms of the world.
However, such a situation is only dreamt because the bad conscience reproaches to him (Jesus) being Satan of the imagination of his. Otherwise, such a dream would not come into existence. The rest of the story is how he (Jesus) represses the truths about himself.
In a similar way, the “arguments” (quotations) he delivered for different points of view about his nature are to understand. E.g., when asking:
Mr 10:18 NKJV
18 So Jesus said to him, "Why do you call me (Jesus "Christ") good? No one is good but One, that is, God.” -
he was suffering from scruples to call himself good (shepherd), not to mention to pose as „god“. Here god is told to be one and not three and because he is differing between himself and god, he does not belong to god (as a part). Here he says that the desperado is saying that he is no god and not good. He is completely right since no desperado is good but an insidious foul player, in a sheep's clothing of "morals". Later, he obviously repressed those scruples when blathering:
Mt 28:18 NRSV
18 And Jesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me (Jesus "Christ").
This quotation does not only mean that he was an associate or shareholder (“son”) of god but that he was “god” instead of god. The one who is keeping or faking to keep “all authority in heaven and on earth” that one is “god” and nobody else. Viz, at least in the beginning Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (alias: Jesus „Christ“) had scruples to pretend and to boast to be „god“ or to be shareholder („son“) of „god“.
Scruples obviously aroused more when he was facing educated Pharisees and less when he blathered to credulous ones. Those scruples once more provide evidence of an inner war on the conscience of his. The latter impressively expressed by pictures to him to be Satan of his and his fellow desperadoes’ (Christians’) imagination.
There is no god suffering from a bad conscience. This is additional evidence that Christians worship Satan, respectively, his son as "god“...
There is no god wanting to be pitied by beings inferior to him. This is additional evidence that Christians worship Satan, respectively, his as "god“...
That is why this paragraph is part of chapter 1.
Firstly: Jesus expressively is no „god“ but human being
Joh 8:40 (NRSV)
40 but now you are trying to kill me (Jesus), a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God.
I (Jesus) was human being. This –- precisely this – is what the “god” of Christian foul players’ sect says about himself. That is what the instigator of Christian foul mouths’ and foul players’ sect says about himself if scruples of his are strong enough to keep him to the truths!
Here, he differs between human being (himself) and god. Once more, his scruples are establishing its place. In this case, he keeps to the truths instead of playing an impostor and living delusion of grandeur to the full, viz, palming himself off as “god” on the victims of his deceits. What honest one sincerely ever could contest that at least in the beginning Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) suffered from scruples committing his crime of posing as “god”?
One should think it over: Millions of individuals are tormented, tortured and massacred by Christian foul players (desperadoes) because they say that this instigator of Christian organized crime („religion“), i.e., Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) was a human being. On top of everything: he calls himself like the murdered ones called him. More over, bear in mind that Christian torturers und murderers desire to be called „god“, pardon, “good shepherds” and even „martyrs“… Even in Christian terrorists’ countries of today, whoever does not comply with that is running the risk of being kidnapped, respectively, jailed by Christian terrorists.
I see, in contrast with Christian doctrines allegedly „infallible“ Christian „god’s word“ witnesses that this unique specimen of instigator of Christian sect is a human being (and no god)! I see, he (Jesus) calls himself to be a human being according to the “infallible” Christians’ “god’s word”, pardon, desperadoes’ word.
Indeed, it is about the individual that otherwise is palmed off as associate or shareholder (the latter is the meaning of „son“) of “god”. I see, the “god” of Christian foul mouths and foul players calls himself to be a human being. The only matter that is to object is that more precisely he rather should had named himself an inhuman being or monstrosity.
Christians’ “infallible” „god’s word“ – allegedly delivering sham-authorization for desperadoes with lust for power to exalt themselves as „shepherds“ over individuals humiliated to be their subservient animals (“sheep”) -- calls him no „god” but just a human being… Baer in mind, this “god” that allegedly „authorized“ all those Christians’ barbarities and other sorts of foul mouth and foul play of theirs on humankind and humanity …!
Whoever, oh yeah, whoever doubts that in Christian terrorists’ sect “wonders” happen, all over and all the time…
That is nothing unusual! Obviously, sometimes even the most felons have to suffer from scruples! That Christian(s) („martyrs“) torture and murdered millions of human beings because the latter said that what even Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (aka: Jesus „Christ“) told, viz, that he is a human being, is nothing new for true-blue desperadoes or foul players, i.e., Christians. Desperadoes of the Christian stamp know that they know everything better than their “god” does, anyway. Especially they know everything better than their “god” does, if it is about grift and subreption of sham-legitimation to reign and hence abasing their fellow human beings to be subservient sheep to them! Finally, desperadoes’ and other foul players’ faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and blathering that is fobbed off as “god’s word”, anyway!
What matters to Christian foul players, desperadoes and Mafiosi is how to exalt themselves as “shepherds” and humiliate everybody else to be their subservient sheep… Everything else, e.g., “god”, “truths”, “god’s word”, “love” and “morals” is to subordinate and to cant according the megalomania and foul play.
In addition, he is no god when referring to Psalm 82:6-7
Joh 10:31 -35 RSV
31The Jews took up stones again to stone him.
32 Jesus answered them, "I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of these doyou stone me?"
33 The Jews answered him, "It is not for a good work that we stoneyou but for blasphemy; because you, being a man, make yourself God."
34 Jesus answered them, "Is it notwritten in your law, 'I said, you are gods'?
35word of God came (and scripture cannot be broken), If he called them gods to whom the
36say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, 'You are blaspheming,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God'? do you
Here, Jesus is referring to Psalm 82:6-7 and faking that the “son of god” is no unearthly, supernatural feature of one unique person but a common attribute of each priest. Allegedly, therefore, each priest can call himself not only “son of god” but also "god" himself... Here, nobody is a component of a “god”, e.g., of “trinity”,
but each priest is a god of his own…
Therefore, claiming to be a god in this sense does not mean being master of humankind or slaveholder what otherwise is demanded, e.g., when he is alleging: “All authority on Earth and heaven is given to me”.
In view of so many “gods”, all those numerous “authorities” of “gods” would bump into each other, sonly.
Among so many “gods”, the same would happen what is used to occurring among Christian sects: They would try wiping out each other. Furthermore, in this case if simulating Jesus really had thought so, he would have behaved quite snotty towards personages that are “gods”, as he tries bamboozling us.
If Christian sects understand the notion of "god” –so far one can admit a notion of god to this heinous sect -- in this manner, as Jesus is lying and pretending here, then its " three-parted" polytheism (“trinity ") would thus inadvertently be proven as an absolute stupidity, unless one has to say that Jesus here himself already unmasks Christian „trinity“ as sheer deception.
He and his infamous schmucks (Christian terrorists) pretend exclusivity (of the “son of god” as one of three constituents (father, son and holy spirit) of “god “(equally natured beings) and besides them there are no gods but inferior beings. i.e., Jesus flagrantly lies to the Pharisees in order to get out of them. However, while deceiving that way he inadvertently admits his
his defeat and
his complete deception towards the Pharisees.
son thus turns out to be man’s deceiver! Because by calling all the other priests „gods“, he admits not believing in a unique god that is three parted (“trinity”). This is what he exactly and inadvertently unveils to the Pharisees. He and his insidious schmucks pretend his exclusivity as constituent ("son”) of “god” and there shall be nothing more divine but these three components: father, son and holy spirit.
Here, he refutes that “trinity“ and thus uncovers it as sheer deceit to the Pharisees, since he claims to call himself “god” not because of any exclusivity (e.g., “son of god” or similar stupidity) but because he is a priest, too.
The concepts of “immaculate conception”, “salvation” and “redeemer” that are cribbed from the
rival of Mithraic-Religion only serve Jesus' intent of exalting himself. Jesus lies to his partners in the talks, because he does not claim to be “god”, because he is a real or conceited ordinary priest but because he is faking to be" redeemer“, “savoir“, “vicarious suffering” and similar nonsense. Jesus deceives, once more1
Yes, because to other partners in talks and another time he argues a reverse way why he claims to be a “god” or “god’s son” and all the other deceitful contrivances (e.g., to be “redeemer“, “savoir“, “vicarious suffering“ and therefore a god but not because he is a priest!). He lies either here or there.
Here, Jesus turns out to be a proven, brazen liar, because he normally always assumes that only one individual can be „god's son” and not each (piggy?) priest as he is claiming here.
Otherwise he simulates that „god's son is a type of junior boss to whom „god“ allegedly has passed all authority on Earth, cosmos, universe and heaven, that is to say that„god“ is proclaimed having retired in favor
of this would-be “god”. Mendaciously Jesus deceives the Jewish partners in his talks and more over he is infamous enough to project the defect of the traits of his own on his opponents or his rivals by calling the other ones (not himself) being liars.
22 All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, or who the Father is except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him."
Mt 28:18 RSV
AndJesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
To his Jewish partners in the talks the swindler (Jesus) lies that the term of "god’s son" was just an ornamental title for preachers, while in Luke 10:22 he claims that this means having got exclusively all the power of the universe and consequently being the unique ruler of the universe instead of the god, who now is called (retired) father (in heaven).
"God's son" is a contrivance of Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy in order to get rid of the “god” by dismissing him as retired "father", so that the upper hoodlum and terrorist of the Christian) sect Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, aka Jesus "Christ" , can sham the “god". That is from what mendacious Jesus "Christ" once more deceitfully is diverting.
Lu 4:6 RSV
6 and (Satan) said to him, "To you I will give all this authority and their glory; for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will.
How closely the words of Jesus and that ones of Satan resemble each other and that according to the doctrines of his own, so far one can speak about doctrines pertaining to this scrap and crap! Jesus does what Satan modeled to him in the desert. When Jesus said that he and the father are one, then here is the evidence that Satan is the father.
Both are fancying the same “power” of keeping the keys on earth and in heaven and to pass it on to those that worship them as the “god”. Whoever wants to deny that they are one? To me Satan never proffered to encounter. Why does Satan meet Jesus? Because bird of a feather flock together!
Truly, it seems that according to Jesus’ opinion Satan pretends having got all authority in heaven and on earth and that he is able to pass it on as he arbitrarily like to do it…Thus Jesus debunks himself being a liar and deceiver comparable to Satan's depravity and this all turns out according to the standards of his own!
In order to proceed let us state Jesus and Satan consent that all authority can be handed over arbitrarily to someone, in return for being worshiped as the god. Whereas the god of the (Jewish) bible never is willing to pass his authority to some one else, even not to a would-be god, co-“god” or underdog, pardon, under god that wants to dismiss him as (old retired) father and replace him as alleged son, i.e., new boss:
Isa 42:8 RSV
48 I am the LORD, that is my name; my glory I give to no other, nor my praise to graven images. ...
Alas, who is the Lord in Christian sect? Oh yes, Christian, answer the question: Who is
the Lord in your sect? God? No! It is the Christian terrorists’ upper hoodlum, desperado and terrorist: Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, gang name: Jesus "Christ“! If you do not believe it, go in a Christian toilet (“church”) and listen to those suckers of sewage! That means the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy try abolishing the “god” by replacing him by a fellow swine of their own with the gang name: Jesus "Christ“!
Therefore, evidently Jesus likewise Satan, provided both are not the same, transfers
honor, glory, authority and power as business in return to those that worshiped them as “god”, for instance. This, Jesus even does in favor of Peter, the serial killer, who killed several human beings, among others early Christian community members, Ananias and Saphira (see: Ac. 5:1-11)and committed perjury several times (see Mt 26,71).
However, he worships Satan, Pardon, and Jesus "Christ" as the god. That is what counts…!
Even the Christian pope terrorist claim this "counterfeit money” they are used to calling “powers of keys” passed on from Jesus to Peter and from allegedly to them – and most pope terrorists were still worse murderers than Peter.
Mt 16:19 RSV
19 I (Jesus) will give you (Peter) the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
Oh yes, the main, the only thing that counts is that Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ" is worshiped as the "god”. For that, Jesus gives you all his counterfeit money like Satan model edit to him, before. Oh yes, oh yes: Precisely as Satan modeled it to Jesus he does it likewise towards his submitted creep n’ crooks.
Obviously Satan authorized him to do so, when both encountered in the desert in order to enter a pact and deliberated how to recruit creeps n’ crooks the easiest way. Of course, Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy deny having entered a pact with Satan.
However, Christian, do use your brain: Supposed, Jesus and Satan entered a pact: Would Jesus and his perfidious schmucks ever admit having done so, would they? Of course, you Christian can answer: Yes, our Jesus would have done it to those “who are poor in spirit” (Mt 5.3), because you can lead all the weak-minded up the garden path…
Anyway, it is very conspicuous that the misdeeds of Jesus very resemble much those ones of Satan as Jesus himself describes them but not those ones of the “god” as prophet Isaiah describes the
behavior of “god”. In addition, to prophet Isaiah Jesus and the Christian terrorists
are used to referring when trying to produce evidence that Jesus allegedly is the predicted Messiah.
Those “keys” are
the “counterfeit money” of Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ" and all the deceitful Christian creeps n’ crooks. This "counterfeit money” is the “currency “ of all the Christian religious rogues, of the scum of the earth.
The god of the Bible the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy degrade as “Old Testament“ keeps his omnipotence and is not willing to become depended on decisions of others, especially on perjurers, knifers, criminals, felons, murderers, mass-murderers, barbarians and the scum of the earth and on the "poor ones in spirit” other morons that presume to decide instead of him (god)...
Cross my heart: That is the best protection against abuse of god’s will, in particular, against all the lies, deception, perjuries, crimes, barbarities, mass-murders, genocide and other abominations of the Christian swineherds' sects!
God as prophet Isaiah – the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy wrongly and falsely refer to – tells us about his management is right, however Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy just want a business: You worship me Satan or Jesus) as the god and I (Satan or Jesus) give you a lot of
“counterfeit money” of alleged „god's" authority by which you can enslave your conspecifics subservient to yourself… Moreover, both, Satan and Jesus, stop at nothing in order to succeed that way...!
Once more it becomes clear that nobody but Jesus himself provided ideological „arguments“ for each point of view a Christian might have about the question as what he (Jesus) shall pose in his sect (e.g., “god”, schmuck of priest, advocate etc.) . Hence, Jesus himself cared for all the stabbing, blinding or prying of his Christian perfidious schmucks.
Thus, Jesus has taken care that everyone can refer to him: The one that is stabbing because the other one does not consent with him about the “true“ nature of man’s deceiver (Jesus "Christ") and even the one that is stabbed or burned, because he or she contradicts those views.
The last mentioned quotation produces evidence that Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ“, indeed exalted himself to the “god” and lied.
The liar and deceiver just is accomplishing his true depraved nature: Telling lies to conspecifics and deceiving them for the advantage of his own:
18 AndJesus said to him," Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.
“Become better than I (Jesus am); make yourselves like the son of the Holy Spirit."[ii]
Conspicuously, alleged aprocryphe chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") and the "canonized" ones correspond one another!
Oh yes, oh yes -- you Christian terrorists , that is the first and best advice that can be given to you from your idol: Become better than this religious rogue, hoodlum and terrorist Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ“, you worship as “god” in place of god:
· Jesus himself is advising that to you.
· Jesus himself knows it: He is not good.
· Since when Satan is good?
· Oh yes, oh yes, listen you wretched Christian terrorists : Your gangster boss or gangster “god” is saying that!
It is exclusive Christian sect’s hunger for power to condition conspecifics to become their slaves that keep them from taking note of all the contradictions Jesus told about himself and what the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy call “doctrines” or “tenets”.
Christian sects want to disguise their disgraceful enslaving of humankind as a reputed will of Satan, Pardon, “god", to which they are used to simulating to have submitted “humbly” and "modestly”. That is why they are interested in picturing Jesus as far as possible as a “god”, oh yes, instead of the god.
However, even here they do not deprave their topmost fellow swine Jesus) in no way, who indirectly admitted that he contrived and fabricate that all in order to the reign the conspecifics, i. e., to make subservient slaves for oneself:
“Know, therefore, that he healed you when you were ill, in order that you might reign.” [iii]
Reigning, reigning, reigning, i.e., making slaves subservient to oneself, prostrating before oneself and knuckling under oneself! That is what „
honorable“ Christian „faith“ is for, camouflaged by the mask of each reverse: „Humbleness“, „modesty“ etc., in order to get victims inattentive! That is what it is about -- it only is about! Those “nice” concepts of “god”, “truth”, “morals”, „ethics”, „miracles“,„revelations“, „god’s word“, „holy spirit“ etc., etc., etc. are only contrivances of the atheist Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") to domineer over the morons, jerks, duffers, mugs, creeps n’ crooks making them slaves, knuckling under him and inducing them to kiss the rings of unscrupulous Christian rogues and religious Mafiosi.
Therefore, Jesus' insidious schmucks (the Christian terrorists) always tried massacring everybody, who was able to debunk their infamous, barbaric and terrorist hunger for power, deceit and enslavement of humankind.
The last quotations are sayings, for which Jesus - after a certain "doctrine " had been established by Christian councils and enforced by slaughtering and murdering those, who opposed them -- today immediately would be denounced heretic or any permission of Christian teaching would be withdrawn from him.
Yes, today Jesus would have to reckon with even excommunication from the sect that adulates him as "god".
In the Middle Ages, his Christian infamous schmucks certainly would have burnt him at the stake for telling the he – the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “god” – is not good but bad, so that he just can advise everybody to become better than he is... Oh yes, Mafiosi are used to behaving tough, even towards the infamous schmucks of their own!
Whoever should claim this pertaining to the “moral” quality of the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “god“ (that Jesus is not good) in a secret encounters of Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy should be glad when escaping with his life, even today…
According to our quotation from Mk 10:18 and the following we quoted from the Apocryphon of James, Jesus is no “god” by distinguishing between himself and the “god” and by rejecting being good, at all.
Whoever could not consent with him that the first thing a human being has to be, is to be better than a liar, deceiver, desperado and terrorist that names himself “god” or an associate of “god” (“god’s son”), and otherwise on top of everything venomously defamed everyone that is better than he – like his insidious schmucks are still used to doing it today–as a Pharisee? Whoever could oppose that correct self-knowledge of man's deceiver?
2ndly:Jesus is no associate of god equal (god’s) nature („son of god“) when disseminating:
Joh 20:17 RSV
17 Jesus said to her, "Do not hold me, for I (Jesus) have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to my brethren and say to them, I (Jesus) am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God."
Joh. 14: 28 RSV
28 ¶ You heard me say to you, 'I go away, and I will come to you.' If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.
If Jesus was god and there is still above Jesus another god, than the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") "god" still has a god above himself. Then, the father is to Jesus god like god is god to all human being without Christianity. That means, that in Christendo(o)m human beings are dehumanized and abased to the level of animals, so that there is only one human being ("man's son" or man's deceiver) that is superior to all his conspecifics like human beings are superior to animals (without Jesus' or the Christian terrorists' insanity).
In order to fake Jesus superior to all his fellow human beings the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy in truth fake him to be the only human being ("man's son", respectively man's deceiver) and that means that all other human beings are like animals to the god. Furthermore, a "god" that still has another god, is no god -- not to speak about equals to god -- at best a monster of human being because he his not almighty, since being depended on the superior god.
That means, primarily Jesus does not lift up himself to the "god" but at first abases or degrades all his fellow human being (conspecifics) to be like animals in order to fake the only human being ("man's son", pardon, man's deceiver). That is what the matter about god and human beings look like if Mafiosi are romping about the subject of religion and god...
Denying the access to god of any individuals, in fact the Christian claim Jesus to be the only human beings that has access to the god above him and thus they cut off all human beings from god. (That alleged unique access of Jesus to the god is the "counterfeited money" of the Christian terrorists .
Therefore, by naming Jesus the "god" the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy make all their fellow human beings animals, slaves and robots submitted to their will to power. Thus Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy fake to be supermen and vilify, slander, libel by degrading all their, oh yes, so "beloved" fellow human being to be subhuman creatures. Jesus pretends having that access to the god each human being has without his (Jesus') and the Christian insanity.
Therefore, the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") power is based on dehumanization of humankind. Without Jesus and his perfidious Christian folks human beings have all those features the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy exclusively claim for Jesus in order to enslave their conspecifics submitted to their will. In addition, with regard to the Christian terrorists' ("desperadoes' ("sinners'") dehumanization, do you really wonder about all the Christian savageness, fierce, depravity, crimes, felonies, atrocities, barbarities and abomination?
This sect makes human beings more depraved than higher developed animals are! Whoever can doubt that the aims of the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are the Middle Ages with all their Christian savageness, outrages, atrocities and other abominations?
Here, let us ignore that at least once the megalomaniac hoodlum allows god to be greater than himself --this dwarfish deformity. You don’t believe it but it is true: There are still some contesting "modesty" and "humility" of man’s deceiver... Oh no, these „stubborn hearts“...!
In views of the allegations that the "father" and the "son" are of equal nature, how is it possible that one (equal!) component (of the "god"), e.g., the father, is greater than the other, e.g., the son?
1st question: How can two thing be equal if the one (father) is superior to the other (son)?
Answer: While lying and deceiving, two parts that are different can be completely equal and even the same! When lying and deceiving, all things are possible that are otherwise impossible (see Mt 17:20). Lies and deceptions even shift mountains (see: Mt 17:20) and the truths anyway! Lie and deceit have "truths" of their own.
2nd question: What is the “truth” of lie and deceit?
Providing lie and deception with the reputation of truths and truthfulness. Those are the “truth” of lie, deception, Jesus and all the Christian terrorists , hoodlums and Mafiosi!
Therefore, there are always" miracles" over "miracles" a necessary concomitant of deceit, because by means of wonders lies should be pose as “truths” in place of truths. Wonders shall replace the truths in the brains of birdbrains, cerebellums, and weak-minded, psychically or mentally ill ones.
That is why:
Mt 5:3 RSV ¶
3 "Blessed are the poor in spirit…
Because they can be bamboozled at the easiest, can’t they?
If the one is inferior to the other but it is claimed that both are “gods”, then it is about polytheism of several “gods” that are differently ranked – regardless, if the Christian Mafiosi perjure the truths about their toilet-religion or not!:
“The Father does not need me (Jesus). For a father does not need a son, but it is the son who needs the father.“ iv
And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice…"My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
Oh my goodness, now the superior “god” is leaving the inferior one… Oh no, what a fine friend god is…! This mischief happens, although the inferior “god” Jesus wants the be superior to the “father god”…
How times are deteriorating more and more –and the “god” evenly is no longer that he once had been…
In both last quotations, Jesus admits that the father doesn't need the son, however the son the father. Here, once more the megalomaniac one very, very “generously admits his inferiority to the
"god". The father doesn't need the son, but there is no the son without father... Whoever, except Christian religious Mafiosi, ever could dare to contradict?
Once more, one can realize that Jesus provided all his Christian sects that venomously denounce and fight one another about the question of what nature their topmost desperado, hoodlum and terrorist is, with corresponding "ammunition" for their stabbing, blinding and stakes …? Don’t they claim that Jesus “loves” each of them…?
He Jesus once more is no "god“ by differing between himself and the god now is able to decide and act without his (Jesus’) permission, like every „sensible “human being distinguishes between itself on the on hand, and god and/or “god’s” decisions on the other.
If Jesus was “god”, then, in this case, he should had put the question the following way: Me, faithless god, why did I leave myself? However, why does an omnipotent, omniscient “god” has to put such questions and does not know it. Putting questions produces evidence of a lack of knowledge and thus that there is no “god” but deceit!
“Lack is the cause of any movement (Aristotle)” and questioning is caused by ignorance… Therefore, a questioning “god” is just a (n
ignorant) deceiver…! If “god” leaves himself he is no god any longer but human being, animal, plant, perhaps Satan or Jesus because Satan also is lacking of knowledge and thus has to question.
When Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy allege pertaining to Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ")
„true“ „god“ and „true" human being they evenly can speak of „truthful“ lies, what Clement of Alexandria seems to do in his letter pertaining to “The Secret Gospel of Mark”.
lies -- like those ones of Jesus "Christ" and his Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy -- consist of two parts: Firstly, falseness in the matter (semantics) and secondly, its reputation as truth. [v] Why "truthful" lie? Because
Therefore for them, each lie always is “true truth” (Clemens of Alexandria). Therefore, the one is the reputation and the other its being. (There is no lie without claiming truths!). Likewise, the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy also can say: True “god” and true spiteful little devil... or true “man’s son” and true snake of venom or dwarf of poison… The first one is always as what it shall be reputed and second one that what it really is. Always there are represented both part of lie and deception.
The main principle of Christian sect conspicuously coincides with the logic of all lying and deceiving: Always claiming the one and its reverse, i.e., giving a matter its reverse reputation, e.g., claiming lies and truths together by imposing lies the reputation of truths and vice versa. If„god“ supposedly can be human being, why Jesus not Satan or Satan’s son?
Summarized: According to the words of his own Jesus is no patch on god. He sometimes very, very" generously” confesses to be inferior to “god”. Therefore, never doubt on Jesus’ “humbleness” and “modesty”…
is not only „god“ (in place of god) but a sort of superior “god” or god’s guardian
Mt 24:35 RSV
Heaven (and thus god) and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.
Now, Jesus is putting himself above the „god“. Since “god” is a constituting part of heaven the felon and lawfully sentenced death penalty convict (Jesus "Christ") even threatens “god” to be going to perish. Some day, the alleged almighty and everlasting (!) „god“ will be dead, however the drivel of this megalomaniac desperado and terrorist will survive...
Ah, ah, ah…
Don’t make me laugh…!
To where the alleged immortal souls of his Christian perfidious schmucks that supposedly shall live eternally in heaven – shall go, when heaven does not exist any longer, he forgot to tell. However, he did not threaten hell to be going to perish, so that there still a place for Mrs. Robinson and all the other Christian jerks, morons or felons and barbarian:" Heaven holds a place for those who pray”, provided it still exists and if not, then hell holds a place for all the Christian liars, deceivers, bandits, murders, terrorists, barbarians!
Mt 28:18 RSV
And Jesus came and said to them," All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me (and thus is not to god).
So, he accepted Satan's proffer when encountering him in the desert, since Satan and no “god” had promised everything to him, in exchange being worshiped as the “god”. Where and when god shall have promised this to him, even Jesus himself forgot to mention this “important event” – as important as to forget it…
On the contrary, as we already demonstrated, prophet Isaiah – the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are used to referring vehemently when proffering their topmost felon and instigator as the “god” or an associate of the “god” -- disputes resolutely and unmistakably that god ever would share any authority of himself with somebody else.
Joh 8:18 NRSV
18 I (Jesus) testify on my own behalf, and the Father who sent me testifies on my (Jesus) behalf."
If all authority in heaven and on earth is given to this pretending one, then evenly that one above the „god“ („father“), who in this case is a subject of him subservient to him or otherwise it is lied and a sheer deception that all authority is passed to Jesus.
Consequently, Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus Christ) is the god and the father perhaps his assistant, messenger or Messiah but not god. God purportedly only can do that what Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: "Jesus Christ") allows him to do... Ben-Pandera does that what he imputes to Satan: posing himself as "god"... God witnesses of Satan or Ben-Pandera. This is how the latter fancy the world...!
If pretending Jesus has no power over the father and is unable to rule him, his authority at least is restricted and never all, i.e., just an empty boasting of a con man “impressing” his sheep, creeps n’ crooks… If Satan would have succeeded to hand over all authority to Jesus, then there would be no “god” any longer, because omnipotence is a premise of god. If Jesus pretends to be omnipotent, then nobody (even “god”) is omnipotent but Jesus. If all authority is to Jesus, then “god” is no longer almighty. The there is no god but Jesus.
· That is the silly Christian toilet's doctrine!
· As silly as depraved as this sect of infamy is!
If all authority is given to Jesus, then „god“ is unable to cope with the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") topmost desperado and terrorist Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" ).
Don’t make me laugh…!
On that condition, the con man truly could threaten „god“ and heaven to be going to perish and that is what the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy most want: To get rid of the god by fabricating and lifting up a felon of their own as the “god”, in place of the god.
Once more, Jesus matches precisely the traits that are used to attributing to Satan according to the doctrines of monotheistic religions. As demonstrated, the devil hands over all authority for being worshiped in return. However, god is used to doing this not at all.
Thus, Jesus consequently and inadvertently – in a sense of a Freudian slip – Jesus admits that he and Satan one and the same.
I also assume that evenly no authority is given to Jesus in order to prevent being called as “god” of all the spiteful little devilsand suckers of sewage in the cesspool among human beings, although he pretends having all authority!
Oh Christian, you read correctly: He is unable to prevent this, although he boasts being able to do it. Remarkable is that even according to the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") doctrines, even to those ones of Jesus: Jesus thinks the same way than he and his insidious schmucks insinuate Satan to do.
1Co 15:24 RSV
24 Then comes the end, when he (Jesus) delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power (even that of god)
28 When all things are subjected to him (to Jesus but not to god ), then (but not now and not before) the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things under him, that God may be everything to everyone (what he is not now).
Imagine the Christian bedlam: Jesus is not subjected to god but the "almighty" god to death penalty convict and felon Jesus "Christ" ...
God may become some day god, if Jesus generously allows him to be almighty god... More over, god is not god because Jesus makes god "to be everything to everyone", what obviously according to the Christian terrorists' bedlam god is not now.
In addition, this means: There is no god in Christendo(o)m because if god is not complete, there is no god. Christendo(o)m is atheism fancying that the instigator of this sects (Jesus "Christ") some day will fully create the god (being everything to everyone)...
More over, there is no omnipotence of god where there is trinity. "God" is fettered in trinity and thus is no god (omnis determinatio est negatio). If god is omnipotent, then he even must be able to get rid of trinity.
Thus it is produce evidence that Christendo(o)m is a perfidious atheism because a god that in not “everything to everyone” is no god as any incomplete omnipotence does not turn out a god.
Christianity is an atheism fancying that its instigator and death penalty convict Jesus "Christ" some day will create a god that “is everything to everyone.” Hence, it is produced evidence that the concept of god is abused as variant of perfidy by the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy in order to enslave their fellow men.
It is easier for the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy to get folks on their kneels by making them believe that they would prostrate before god but not for their human slaveholders (Christian schmucks in frocks).
If he is unable to do that, he is not omnipotent but only limited potent. However, as it seems according to the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") New Testament the poor god at least cannot get rid of Jesus "Christ"... What a weakling, what a wimp of "god"...
However, this means quite more a disgrace than some Christianly trained German shepherd can imagine.
As generally known the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy claim that Jesus "Christ" hanged on a cross. Each crucifix shall witness that. However, about those that hang on a cross god indeed has explicitly quite a different view than the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are conditioned to believe or fool themselves:
De 21:23 (ASV)
23 his body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt surely bury him the same day; for he that is hanged is accursed of God; that thou defile not thy land which Jehovah thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.
Oh yes, he (Jesus "Christ") who hanged is accursed of God! Whoever can doubt? Are not the Christians right claiming that the Bible (Christians' cant: "Old Testament") correctly predict Lucifer (Christians' cant: "Jesus")?
Moreover, the infamous Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy want to compel god to keep company with a death penalty convict and/or an accursed one onto him... They want the almighty god to obey to such a felon and to castrate himself in order to become impotent to get rid of a felon and an accursed onto him...
The desire of Jesus "Christ" of being "god" is not different with those of Satan according to the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") own doctrines and Jesus perfidy, anyway!
This is such a bedlam that it is to question if sufficiently intelligent Paul wants to ridicule Christendo(o)m. There are some other clues - we will point out in other chapters -- that he sometimes did so.
Indirectly, Paul hereby says: Only if the universe that god has furnished deficiently
s) keep the god fettered: [vi], is successfully adjusted to the advantage, i.e., selfishness, of our satanic and dark desires by Ben-Pandera, whom we lifted as or "god", then there might be a god but only on that condition. This exactly is the same Satan fancies according to the Christians' own doctrines! As long as Jesus has not succeeded in accomplishing that, we (Jesus and his infamous schmuck
Mt 12:29 RSV
Or how can one enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? Then indeed he may plunder his house.
Mr 3:27 RSV
27 But no one can enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man; then indeed he may plunder his house.
Jesus is the personified infamy. However, even according to Christian doctrines insidiousness is a trait of Satan. How Jesus and Satan resemble each other... The real miracle in Christendo(o)m. Resemble? Who knows that they are not the same? In what way Satan ever would behave different with Jesus? By making the victims fettered and thus defenseless before assaulting them, Christendo(o) precisely turns out to be an organized crime of infamy.
Here, Jesus tell his perfidious fellow schmucks: If the victim is able to defend itself we will lose but if we worm our way into its confidence and get it confident to us, so that it falls our trap, then we will win because being captured in a trap one cannot defend itself. Insidiousness, perfidy and infamy all over where there is something or much that is called Christian!
Oh yes, you Christian, you read correctly: Jesus, your felons’ coach knows how to pilfer at best… That is you “honor” and your “charity”! Oh yes, the Planet’s greatest coach of felons knows all the dodges!!!
„God “like any other worthy matters, for example, morals, truths etc. are made harmlessly for this sect of Mafiosi by getting fettered by Satan, pardon, Jesus "Christ" and his fellow perfidious schmucks, viz, Christian "sinners"). Moreover, they shackle them by making them a mean of all their turpitude, felonies, barbarities and atrocities.
This, they are used to succeeding by semantic simulation (juggling with names), i.e., by claiming and pretending to stand for that what they most secretly are war faring on. For example, Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy pretend to obey the god and the truths.
However, these are their most hated enemies they want to extinguish. Their felons' coach (Christian jargon: "innocent lamb loving all his enemies") realized that this is the most successful thing: Getting rid off matters one want to get rid of ever by pretending and feigning to promulgate them…
There is no more abomination among human beings than Christendo(o)m!
They fool themselves rendering the strong god harmless to their turpitude, barbarities, atrocities and abominations by lifting up their topmost hoodlum (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") to the "god”. Oh yes, oh yes -- if one wages war on god, one must be up to all the scores, tricks and dodges...! Jesus "Christ" , the world topmost coach of felons is it!
Indirectly, Paul more over threatens the god that he instantly becomes fettered again, if he later changes something to the disadvantages of the Christian felons. So, they “humbly” and "modesty” fancy god as a servant of the maliciousness, turpitude, crimes, felonies, barbarities and abominations of theirs.
That means: The Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are replacing god by Jesus. Again, this is precisely an attitude what the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") doctrine attribute to Satan…! One can judge the Christian abomination by the terms of its own! Likewise, morals and truths are shackled by turning into a weapon of Christian lies, deceit, perfidy, viciousness, and wickedness. This, those perfidious biped accomplish by claiming their lies, deceit, perfidy etc.
as “truths”, “morals”, “love” etc.
There is no nasty trick Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" , cannot contrive…!
All that scrap, crap and sewage Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ" and his really very the sick -- that really are in need of a physician -- fabricate and concoct in their sick, very insane as perfidious brains...! That malicious belief never shifted a mountain and never achieved that.
These toilets' insanity, this contents of sewers, this crap, this confusion of larynx and head, anus and brain, has a name: Jesus, Christianity, Christian swineherds, trinity and similar products of human’s scum!
Jesus and his insidious schmucks fool themselves in believing that crap allegedly becomes gold when served on golden trays. For these despicable contrivances this sum of the earth even is willing to stab others and to snuff itself.
If Jesus would have had abolished every reign and authority, i.e., corrected god’s creation (that is what Paul says here!), then he evenly would have destructed god’s authority in favor of himself and his insidious schmucks (Christians) – according to that megalomania. This is what he means by boasting that heaven and earth will pass but never his blather.
According to his insane contrivances “god” passes because he will perish as a constituting component of the heaven. Therefore, as last place for the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") alleged immortal souls the hell is left – the real place where that depraved scum of the earth belongs to.
Here, men’s deceivers allege that
a) the almighty god is not omnipotent, since he is not in everything
b) he is not almighty, because Jesus does not pass all authority to him, yet
Jesus is not submitted to the „god“ but god allegedly subjugated to Jesus. Don’t make me laugh...!
Only when Jesus has arranged everything in favor of the aims of the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") world war -- of the last one on the first -- then, only then, God can be the God… Therefore, Jesus is not submitted to the god but god to him. Jesus is the guardian, i.e., the upper" god”. Ah, ah, ah…! Don’t make me laugh..!
The Christian terrorists
-- who are intellectual and spiritual midgets but morally brutes -- try substantiating this stupidity that is hardly to describe by alleging that “god” had castrated himself in favor of Jesus, so that this megalomaniac one shall correct all the mistakes and error that this duffer that is called “the god” has made when creating the world… Don’t make me laugh…!
Besides the mentioned counterfeit money, the megalomania of Jesus as being worshiped as the “god” is very popular in Christianity, because these Mafiosi do not like god’s creation– as it is unveiled in the gospel of Jesus’ disciple Philip. So, they want to have a god of their own, faked as alleged “son of god”, in order to correct all the conceited mistakes, injustices, defects etc. when this jerk, mug or duffer that is called god was creating the world...
In addition, this is another trick from the bag of tricks of man’s deceiver and the felons’ coach: Killing somebody by feigning to love him… That another trick of Jesus, the Planet’s most felons' coach: I you cannot warfare someone openly, suffocate him by faking to give him a cuddle… That is the way this sect of infamy deals with god in favor of the topmost fellow swine Jesus "Christ" !
From prophet Isaiah those foul and deceitful liars pick out what is in favor of their deception and about that, what refutes their deceit and reveals their lies they are used to simulating as if it isn’t written in the book of Isaiah.
Since, as already produced evidence, prophet Isaiah, who foretold the Jewish Messiah -- Jesus "Christ" pretends so much to be and refers so much to him -- said that god does not give up any authority of himself so somebody else, whereas Jesus is used to faking that “god” hardly can wait handing over all his authority to Jesus.
More over, prophet Isaiah did not say that the Messiah of the Jews is a god or an associate of the god… “God’s” son that is no Jewish but a Mithraic idea that deceitful and mendacious Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy cribbed from Mithraic religion before infamous Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy murdered that rival.
Above, we already demonstrated, this is exactly the scam of Satan according to Jesus himself claiming constantly that all authority is given to him and he arbitrarily could pass it to whom he likes to hand over it. Precisely the scam of Jesus is also that one of Satan or vice versa, i.e., Jesus is Satanic according to the standards of his own.. Finally both, Satan as well as Jesus wants to be “god”.
the Father loves the Son, and has given all things into his hand.
Joh 16:15 RSV
15 All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Megalomania of a religious rogue is not restricted, especially in view of the „sickness“, i.e., depravity, of the Christian terrorists . Satan, pardon, Jesus does not take anything from the god but the god has to crib from Jesus… Don't make me laugh...!
This bedlam is called Christendo(o)m!
However, again it is conspicuously that such strange transfer, by which the transferring one allegedly agrees with gettingaved ones, precisely coincides with Satan’s way of thinking and that on top of everything according to Jesus’ “doctrines” of his own: shackled in favor of the universe most depr
Lu 4:6 RSV
6 and (Satan) said to him his partner in talks Jesus "Christ" ), "To you I will give all this authority and their glory; for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will.
In addition, precisely like Satan --and in contrast with prophet Isaiah’s revelation how god
practices his authority – Jesus is used to dealing with those that worship himas the god:
18 Truly, I (Jesus) say to you (my Christian perfidious schmucks), whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Jesus and Satan produce" counterfeit money” the same way. Here, the son (Jesus)
is of equal nature to the father (Satan). In contrast with god as described by prophet Isaiah, Satan as well as Jesus offer "great” rewards of “counterfeit money” for being worshiped as the “god”. Satan, Jesus and the Christian terrorists
have the one currency, i.e., the same currency!
Also from the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'")
own writings, it can be said that the prophet Isaiah spoke the truth when revealing that god never hands over any authority of his to somebody else and share it with another person. According to Jesus’ and the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") doctrines, this is Satan’s practice, provided, that there is a business in return, i.e., if Satan is worshiped as the god by those ones receiving authority from him.
Jesus and the Christian terrorists
behave like Satan:
Mr 16:16 RSV
16 He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned
i.e., Jesus and his perfidious schmucks promise much authority, provided that they are worshiped as the„god“ (Jesus), respectively as „god's" chosen ones (Jesus’ perfidious schmucks, i.e., the under-slaveholders).
Furthermore, Jesus transfers his “counterfeit money” (faked authority of the “keys”) to his closest infamous schmucks, e.g., Peter, as Satan modeled it to him, when both encountered in the desert. Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") completely tallies with the patterns of Satan’s behavior -- and this according to the imaginations of his own.
Since Satan wants to be god – as Jesus evidently
wants to be – the „society of conceited and kidding dogs, Pardon, „gods“ does not know whocribs from whom, i.e., if the son cribs from the father or the father from the son… They Jesus and the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy morally can compete with the devil animals of Tasmania (Australia).
known Satan, pardon, Jesus has handed over those „counterfeit money” that is circulating in Christian sect of depravity and barbarians, labeled as “power of the keys” (potestas ligandi et solvendi) to Peter and all the following pope terrorists. Didn’t Satan say that he could pass his “counterfeit money” to anybody he arbitrarily wants to do it...?
Therefore, Jesus "Christ" claims to be Satan, Pardon, the guardian of the “god”, since “god” has to crib from him and
he did not from the “god”… In contrast with Jesus’ sayings, prophet Isaiah – the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy refer to produce evidence that Jesus is the alleged predicted Messiah – witnesses that this is no practice of the god!
As already indicated, here it is not about
sophistic hair-splitting but essentially about camouflaging the planet’s most satanic crime that names itself Christianity. All dictatorship, all tyranny, all despotism, all crimes, all felonies, all barbarities, all stakes and other atrocities of this disastrous religious Mafia or sect of infamy is based on that, what Jesus himself modeled as Satan's practice (his alleged “temptations by Satan” in the desert), he precisely perpetrated himself towards his closest fellow swine Peter.
Here, it is about the so-called "potestas ligandi et solvendi" on Earth, the "counterfeit money" of the Christian swineherds supposedly to bind and to loose all on Earth in the name of Satan or Jesus "Christ" what allegedly simultaneously is also done in heaven – a heaven Jesus did not believe in. [viii]
Here, it is not about small or little tings: It s abut the ideological fundament of
the Planet’s most organized crimewhat labels as religion: Christendo(o)m! That is also why the Christian terrorists (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners") so gladly correspond to the megalomania of Jesus being “god” or “god’s” son: If Jesus is not reputed as the “god”, then the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are unable to fob the "counterfeit money” Jesus has given to them off as real money on their conspecifics (they want to enslave to themselves by it).
For that “counterfeit money” they can buy nearly
everything: Enslavement of humankind, reputation, estates, property, money, wealth (Constantine subreption), even the worst crimes, felonies, atrocities and abominations. If Jesus cannot be imposed as the “god” or “god’s” son on their conspecifics, then the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “counterfeit money” is detected as “counterfeit money” and nothing is to buy with it, any longer.
That is why they “humbly” and “modesty” worship Satan, pardon, Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ") as the “god”… Everything in this sect of lies, deceits and crimes on humanity and human rights
is a kind of “Constantinian forgery” that was not perpetrated out of the blue!
The model that Jesus describes himself as an example of Satan’s practice became very sophisticated in history of Christian organized crime, for example, in the bull "Unam
Sanctam" of the pope-terrorist with the Christian gang name "Boniface VIII" (1230 -1303).
These Christian swineherds are used to making use of all for the benefit of their own, what prophet Isaiah -- to whom the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy refer when faking sham-evidence that Jesus was the predicted
Jewish Messiah -- literally disputes as god's practice, oh yes, even Jesus himself depicted as one of Satan.
However, this did not make him shrinking from acting precisely that way he described as the one of Satan, e.g., passing the alleged authority of they keys to Peter (see: Mt. 16,19).
In all these cases it is about the business in return of rogues and Mafiosi:“Counterfeit money” in exchange of being worship as “god”.
This demonstrates that our criminal investigation of the gospel is a very down-to-earth unveiling
criminal history and practice of this sect of infamy and how crimes work in this sect of abomination.
One can say that Jesus --by transferring the conceited “authority of the keys" to his infamous schmucks --induced all the poisoning of interpersonal relationships and the destruction of revenge on humankind of Christian sect.
Those are the “fruits” of his and according to the standards of his own he can be realized as humankind’s felon by the abominations of the sect of perfidy he gave birth, i.e., Christendo(o)m.
So, man’ s deceiver and man's felon, Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, gang name: Jesus "Christ" ,
succeeded in spreading, genocide and other destruction of humankind devastating our planet. turpitude, crimes, felonies, warfare, stakes
He deliberately launched this "virus" of
self-destruction and slaughtering of each other on humankind and already enjoyed watching how the virus worked, when he was said allegedly having gone to heaven, however and indeed secretly continued to live on in his sect’s catacombs – heaven that does not exist according to the views of his own. [ix]
Already at his time, he could watch how well his virus worked among his henchmen and henchwomen: Reviling each other, Denouncing each to other, blinding each other, slaughtering each other, murdering each other etc. This "virus” has a name: Christendo(o)m and/or Jesus "Christ" ! Moreover, his “counterfeit money” also has a name: Claves regni coelorum (CRC), i.e., , keys of the heaven. The “counterfeit currency” of the most organized crime!
There is no turpitude, no crime, no atrocity, no barbarity and no abomination that "virus” that is called “Christendo(o)m” ever shrank from accomplishing. Comparably to computer-viruses, which stealthily and camouflaged as “Trojan horses” are used to sneaking their way into computers in order to destroy its soft- and hardware, the virus “Jesus "Christ" ” or “Christendo(o)m” creeps into the brains, in particular in those ones of creeps n’ crooks, in order to enslave them and to produce zombies, trained “sheepdogs”, soulless automations.
Yehoshua-ben-Pandera already took a mischievous pleasure in watching how the brains of human beings became programmed for reviling, slandering, blinding, stabbing, killing
war faring each other by his “Trojan horses” of “god”, “love”, “charity” ,“truths”, “heaven”, “vicarious atonement”, “remission of sins” etc.
Summarized: Jesus pretends to be guardian of God, not only because he fakes to be “god” but also since he fosters
thebedlam that he keeps all almighty authority and even if god wants something, he (“god”) has to take it from him Jesus) and not he from the “god” (“father”). Hereby, he claims to be superior to the “god” (father) – a kind of guardian of “god”… Ah, ah, ah…!
The Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy are used to yielding to Jesus’ megalomania to be the “acting god” – what they understand by the term of “god’s” son – in order to fob their “counterfeit money”, the so-called" powers of the keys”, off as real money on their conspecifics, viz, the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy lift up Jesus to the god in order to get their “counterfeit money" working. By that “counterfeit money" they succeed in buying almost all, until now…
Later, this "counterfeit money" becomes more sophisticated in this sect of insidiousness, for example,
in the bull “Unam Sanctam” of the pope-terrorist with gang name Boniface VIII. “God” is only a dummy in Christian sect of infamy in order to fake their topmost desperado and hoodlum Jesus "Christ" as the “god”, i.e., Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy do not believe in the god but that Jesus is reputed to be god.
The first is theism and the (Christian) latter is a kind of atheism. In god, this sect of perfidy does not believe at all. It is used to fostering the myth of “god” about its instigator (Jesus) in order to get their lies and deceits beyond questioning and thus itself, i.e., Christian sect as purported successor of the “powers of keys” (the counterfeit money).
Hereby Christian sect hopes and mostly succeeds in spreading and establishing its almost unrestricted as unassailable tyranny (reign) of turpitude, crimes, felonies, barbarities and abominations, until today.
thly: Jesus is god (instead of god) what Christian foul players are used to faking as „god’s son“
Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera’s (Lucifer name: Jesus "Christ") megalomania was out of bounds when speaking to corresponding goofy folks (that is “poor in spirit” Mt 5:3).
Here, we are going to produce evidence that the megalomaniac felons’ coach Jesus "Christ" sometimes pass himself off as the only unique god.
Jesus said, "It is I who am the light which is above them all. It is I who am the all. From me did the all come forth, and unto me did the all extend. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Lift up the stone, and you will find me there." x
Particularly the last saying from „The gospel of Thomas“ produces evidence that the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy have an insane felon to the „god“. In the last paragraph we already mentioned why the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy so gladly give in Jesus' desire of being the „god“.
Already in the last paragraph we pointed out why the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy yield to the con man's megalomania of pretending to be a “god”. Even the „optimism“ of Islamic theologians that Jesus did not lift up himself to the „god“ cannot be maintained. The quotation is unambiguous. If the intellectual level of his audience was that low, the con man pretended to be all!
That is why the stupid(„poor in spirit“) ones are praise to be „blessed“ in his “sermon on the mountain”, because they believe the con man all contrivances, all lies and all deceptions. Behaving more insanely than he is doing here, that’s hardly possible and to imagine. Obviously he did not number himself to those, who are “poor in spirit”, didn’t he? However, he "loved” those because on those ones he could palm all his
“counterfeit money” off.
If his auditory consisted of educated Pharisees, then this monstrosity of lie and deception of course disputed to be “god's” son or played down this concept in the sense that each priest could name himself a “god”.
By the way, the last quoted passage from the chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") ofThomas does not contradict Paul’s first epistle to the Corinthians according to which “god“ will not become all in all before the end of the world. However, by this fellow swine (Paul) Jesus is said being this (all in all) already right now, here and today.
· Once more evidence what a dope “god” is according to the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") bedlam.
· Once more evidence that super felon and super death penalty convict Jesus "Christ" is the only “god” of the Christian objectifications of perfidy …
1Co 15:28 RSV
When all things are subjected to him (Jesus), then the Son himself will also be subjected to him (thefather) who put all things under him, that God may be everything to everyone.
In the Christian bedlam Jesus decides what „god“ is allowed to do… That means that in the Christian bedlam Jesus is the “god” in place of god. In the Christian bedlam the almighty and everlasting god is put into the shackles of religious Mafiosi.
The almighty and everlasting god is put on Jesus’ and Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") charity, in the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") bedlam. Here Paul says that it is up to Jesus to decide when (the almighty) god is allowed to be god… My word, what a bedlam! Don’t make me laugh! My word, god shall be depending on the “charity” of a sect of infamy that is what one can rely on… Don’t make me laugh!
Moreover, there are still some claiming that Christian objectifications of perfidy have no "charity"… If god well behaves in the Christian bedlam like a little child, he perhaps, but only perhaps, gets a reward by Jesus and his perfidious schmucks…
Once more, thus is produced evidence: The Christian terrorists always care for a way out for all those miseries and atrocities they provide. If god is obedient and subservient to the Christian terrorists , Mafiosi, rogues, knifers, murders, creeps n’ crooks, he perhaps and probably may become all in all, so Jesus helps…
Anyway, god can apply to Christian terrorists’ boss Jesus "Christ" and his perfidious schmucks for becoming so…Don’t call the Christian objectifications of perfidy monstrosities…!
It is about expelling god from the universe by replacing him by Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, gang name: Jesus "Christ" . Believing in god may not harm Christian organized crime any longer, if the instigator of this barbarianism is lifted to the “god”, likewise any morals cannot do harm that most organized crime, if they are adjusted to their perfidy, maliciousness, wickedness, crimes, felonies, murders, mass-murders, barbarities and abomination. It is just a matter of juggling with names!
· That is the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") interest in "morals”!
· Those are their contrivances when they puff themselves up about “god”, “morals”, “love”, “truth”, “heaven” etc.
By the following sayings Jesus again is lifting up himself to the “god” by trying to replace him, too.
Joh 6:48 RSV “I am the bread of life.”
Joh 11:25 RSV ... "I am the resurrection and the life…”
Joh 14:6 …"I am the way, and the truth, and the life…”
In that way, only Satan or another one that is lifting up himself to the “god” can speak that way. The Christian terrorists' ("sinners'")bedlam once more is to realize when considering that this megalomaniac one of all felt qualified for blaming the Pharisees of arrogance…! Telling blatant lies and behaving oneself impertinently without blushing that is what the best felons' coach (Christian jargon: "innocent lamb loving all his enemies") of the planet “taught” well his perfidious schmucks to do!
That all produces evidence that Jesus and/or Christianity have to do with the „god“ as much as the Mafia with respectable companies. Christian sect is about a terrorism romping about religion. In this context, we disregard that the Christian objectifications of perfidy -- as a matter of course -- use title for their topmost felon Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ") that are exclusively reserved to the “god” according to prophet Isaiah or to other parts of the Jewish bible (“Old Testament) the Christian feign to accomplish, e.g.," Lord” or “Redeemer” etc.
This once more produces evidence that the Christian bedlam is atheism and does not worship god but lifted its domestic pig to “god” in order to worship it as the “god”…
Jesus isn’t even a Messiah but just an apostle, high priest, advocate or comforter
1Joh 2:1 RSV
1 ¶1Jo 2:1 ¶ My little children, I am writing this to you so that you may not sin; but if any one does sin, we have an advocate (Paraclete)
with the Father, Jesus "Christ" the righteous;..
According to this epistle of disciple John, Jesus is only a prophet in a row of many prophets, if at all. By the way, Jesus announced another Paraclete (see: Joh15:26) to come after his lifetime. Therefore naming Jesus a Paraclete means to contradict and to refute that he is more than a prophet, if at all a prophet.
Heb 3:1 RSV
¶ 1 Therefore, holy brethren, who share in a heavenly call, consider Jesus, the apostle and high priest of our confession.
Here, the author of “The Epistle to the Hebrews” that is also accepted to the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'")' New Testament cannot resist temptation getting his own back on Jesus because of his megalomania. Calling a conceited „god“ an apostle or high priest is comparable with addressing a king with „Inspector“… According to the last quotation Jesus is nothing else but that what most of his perfidious schmucks are: An ugly schmuck of priest:
I (Jesus) intercede on your behalf with the Father, and he will forgive you much." [xi]
According to this quotation Jesus claims the job of prophet likewise Muhammad in Islam. That means, if Islamic “theologians” contest that Jesus is more than a prophet, they really have “their” Jesus and enough quotations from the Christian scriptures because Jesus provided all views about himself what is and what he isn’t with ammunition to stab or gun down each other because of the differences of opinion.
From all those contradictions it is to infer that
a) Jesus himself did not know as what he should pose in his sect, apart from the principle of flying as high as most possible and
b) among the supporters or insidious schmucks of the terrorists’ boss (Jesus), at least in the outset there was no consent as what Jesus shall be passed off on the victims conspecifics). Even the closest insidious schmucks were indecisive:
Jesus said to his disciples, "Compare me to someone and tell me whom I am like."
Simon Peter said to him, "You are like a righteous angel."
Matthew said to him, "You are like a wise philosopher."
Thomas said to him, "Master, my mouth is wholly incapable of saying whom you are like."
This quotation already is sufficient reason why the Christian objectifications of perfidy wanted to get rid off Thomas’ gospel forever. If somebody shall pose as the “god” then this must be done standardized according to this claim from the very outset. Everything else already debunks the deceiver.
However, the chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") ofThomas provides evidence that such megalomaniac claims were the results of contrivances of tricks that successively turned out in the course of time. The disciples concoct each possible blarney about their gangster-boss but not the ones each conditioned Christian slave his waiting for: “You are Christ, son of the living god” (Mt 16,16)…
Even zealot (i.e., terrorist) Peter, otherwise always enraptured with
overzealousness for the gang’s topmost desperado and terrorist (Jesus "Christ") does not get the “right” idea (of deception) calling him “god” or at least Christ…!
Weren’t the Christian objectifications of perfidy right finally to forbid all the other chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") and scriptures when the result of their mutual stabbing and burning was: He was "god's” son, equally natured to “god“... The most abominable of all these depraved bipeds, this scum of the earth is their instigator and their “god": Jesus "Christ" !
However, do not let us miss to see the subtleties of the last quotation. What is that what Thomas’ mouth probably could not bear to whom Jesus is alike? That he was “god” or “god's” son? Well, the Christian objectifications of perfidy are used to babbling that way very, very easily. Don’t they? If one does not think so, the passage of Mt 16:16 should be advised to read. Or one should enter their toilets (“churches”) and watch their excretions: Just in a quarter hour at least, they drivel one dozen time about "god's “ son having in mind their instigator and topmost terrorist (gang name: Jesus "Christ" ).
That is as certain as one can watch there dark, deadly serious, revenge swearing miens of (the Christian) inhibited creeps, crooks and terrorists! So, what could it be what Thomas’ mouth is unable to endure? That Jesus is Satan, like Satan or Satan’s son – that is what Thomas’ mouth as that one of all these liars, swindlers, barbarians and terrorists is unable to endure!
No glad tidings but funny tidings, aren’t they?)! Peter, for example, who flatters Jesus according to Mt. 16:16 as
“son of god”, here, in the chronicle (Christians' cant: "gospel") ofThomas just calls him a “righteous angel”. (Are there also unrighteous angels?).
John adulates Jesus as „god" or „god’s“ son in his gospel and in his first epistle that is also indexed to the Christian bible he just names him „Parakletos“, i.e., Paraclete, advocate or comforter! Listen, listen!
Moreover, when the Christian rogues claim that always according to the needs of their deceits and their lies Jesus is sometimes shall be "god" and on the other hand a human being, then it is to question, why he is no animal. Firstly, this and his infamous schmucks’ depravity are mostly below the moral level of the most advanced mammals, perhaps apart from brutes.
One rather can trust in one’s dog or cat than in Jesus or any other Christian. In particularly, Jesus’ cannibalism that especially is expressed by Christian Communion, ranks him more among beast of prey than among human beings, not to mention among “gods”:
Jesussaid, "Blessed is the lion which becomes man when consumed by man; and cursed is the man whom the lion consumes, and the lion becomes man." [xiii]
Ah, ah, ah...! That’s the animals’ „god“! My word, what a „wise philosopher“…! Therefore, this moron believes that by eating the "god” one becomes „god“ and if you eat pork you become a pig, perhaps a Christian schmuck of priest! That’s the real „philosopher“ and „god“ of the cannibals…!
That is the „mystery“ of Christian cannibalism that pompously is called Eucharist or Communion.
Perhaps, that’s the reason why Muslims do not eat pork, in contrast with the Christian terrorists. Christian barbarians’ sect is not only one of psycho-terror and terror but also one of cannibalism. However, cannibalism belongs to real barbarianism. Birds of a feather flock together…!
Jesus never knew where his megalomania should stop and what kind of things it can create. In this respect, he primarily is the cause for all the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") the slaughters and stabbing among each other, especially their fractions against each other.
By his contradictions that are necessarily caused by his lies and deception, the germs all those Christian turpitude, crimes, barbarities, atrocities and abominations are sown and just waiting to grow and outburst, provided they have fallen on fertile soil – as he impressively described it by his parable of the sower, i.e., if those “germs”get down well with depraved ones, with the scum of the earth.
That turpitude, stabbing, burning and slaughtering among the Christian objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy and of the Christian objectifications of perfidy on humankind are no question of matter but only one of opportunities.
Therefore, for each Christian kind of deception Jesus provided a version of its own and he gave up to care for all his snafu contradictions. (His successors tried doing it. In addition, that is why they forbid certain chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels")). He -- and not any scapegoats - provided for each version of Jesus its Jesus. He provided "arguments”, i.e., knifes, swords, pyre for all who dissident about what he shall pose in this sect. Those who claim their Jesus for the only true one, are confusing Jesus’ insidiousness, perfidy and infamy with the truths.
Weren’t the Christian objectifications of perfidy
– this the lowermost kind of all human beings – right lifting up human being that much above the animals? Why? Because they know, that the Christian objectifications of perfidy traits regarding morals usually cannot cope with those of more highly developed mammals.
Oh yes, I argue that many apes, dogs, cats, dolphins and elephants are not those depraved subjects than these " Saints of the Latter Days " and all the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") “Saints“, sons of Satan, pardon, "god” and the large majority of all the Christian objectifications of perfidy – these nefarious scum of the earth -- are.
These Christian objectifications of perfidy are even that morally low that they want to trample on the animals in order to exalt themselves…! There is no worse wretchedness than Jesus "Christ" and
Summarized: Jesus always was indecisive what job he shall pretend in his sect, apart from being the instigator of this immortal blemish on humankind (Nietzsche), his sect embodies. In principal,
man’s deceiver wanted to fake the most what his conspecifics’ stupidity allowed him to claim: (Piggy) priest, apostle, Paraclete, prophet, man’s son, "god's” son, redeemer, lord etc.
This ladder he climbed up and down corresponding to his audience’s imbecility.
6thly :Jesus is father – not „son of god“
This however are
not all difficulties Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ") had had pertaining to is choice of career, yet.
That there still could be a “father” --some rank higher than the megalomaniac one –that possibility was sticking in Jesus’ stomach. However: “Peace with you": There is no megalomaniac that even finds for this “problem” a “solution". Having already threatened
heaven and earth perishing and thus even the god because god is a constituent of heaven, the megalomaniac Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ") clears up the father, too.
How could it be else, ever? Once more, he is dipping into his bag of tricks by naming himself
the father and hereby eliminates the father, i.e., the God. As said, it is one basic trick of Jesus’ and the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") bag of tricks always claiming that for themselves what they are lacking most.
For instance, all those “matters” that are able to make difficulties for the Christian sinners’ turpitude, crimes and felonies, like for instance: “god”, “morals”, “love”, “truths", "humanity” etc. are rendered harmless to Jesus or his infamous schmucks by claiming them, without further ado and b. semantic simulations (juggling with names). This is his already mentioned trick his coached felons (Christians)adopted very, very much: Killing by faking to give the victim a cuddle.
What the Christian objectifications of perfidy are used to boasting as “morals” or “charity”
of theirs, indeed is nothingbut honor among thieves or crooks. In this case, this general Christian trick means that Jesus himself claims to be the father. That’s the way the boss of Christian Atheism (Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera) eliminates god (“the father”):
"Because I (Jesus) am a father, do I not have power for everything?"
Now, the Christian bedlam is complete! Because he fancies to be father, he fools himself being almighty. Thus, he inadvertently admits the “father” just being a dummy serving him for the purpose of faking to be “god” himself of those scum of the earth that is called Christian sinners). Or in other words: Here, Jesus debunks “god” solely as a framework for him, by which is lifting himself up to the “god”.
believed in nothing but inEach one that believes in “god” would be too frightened as to pass himself off as the “god” or as an associate of the “god”. Only an atheist can do that. his megalomania. He did not believe in god but only in his ability of pretending to be “god”. Otherwise, he never would have dared to fake “god” or “god’s “ son.
However, as atheist they are used to understanding the anti-Christ… Therefore, Christianity with Jesus as domestic pig or domestic “god” of its own is atheism. Nobody that worships his domestic pig as the “god” thus has become a theist. So, evenly not Christendo(o)m! That is idolatry and/or atheism. Pretending to be a „god “
and being a god that is comparable to a wolf putting on a sheep’s clothing.
thly: Only swank of an accursed one by god (De 21:23)
In view of those proved contradictions, it is to question if there is a synthesis solving them. Finding it, we at first have to provide evidence what really this Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") is.
As generally known he and his fellow objectifications of perfidy (Christians) Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera’s (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") mission allegedly is predicted or announced by the old prophets of the Jews that promulgated god’s laws and commandments. So far the bible of the Jews – the Christian objectifications of perfidy call „Old Testament“– is claimed to be the evidence of everything Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (braggart name: Jesus "Christ") claims and demands, in particular, about himself.
Mt 5:17-18 (NRSV)
17 ¶ "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.
If the prophets and the laws are the true and important that nothing can be changed then we are obliged to research what the prophets and the laws reveal about him. For instance, there is the relevant and sufficient passage of the Deuteronomy:
De 21:23 NRSV
22 When someone is convicted of a crime punishable by death and is executed, and you hang him on a tree (Latin Vulgate: “in patibulo” that means on the crossbeam of a cross)
23 his corpse must not remain all night upon the tree; you shall bury him that same day, for anyone hung on a tree is under God’s curse. You must not defile the land that the LORD your God is giving you for possession.
I see, somebody that is hanged is accursed by god! Under god’s curse like Satan and his Anointed One (Hebrew: Messiah, Greek: Christos) are accursed by god! Those prophets tell us that the one the Christian palm as “god’s Anointed One” off on the deceits’ victims, in truth, is the accursed one by god – as Satan and the sins are accursed by god! I see, there are rogues n’ frogs with and without frocks, bastards n’ dastards, slobs n’ flops and /or creeps n’ crooks fobbing Satan or a likewise accursed one by god as “god” on others …! Are not the henchmen of this accursed one by god (Christian rogues and felons) proud to carry about a cross with a hanging one, they lifted up to their “god”? Whoever, besides such
type of felons
bastards n’ dastards,
rogues with and without frocks or
other sort of Satan’s henchmen
perpetrate that piece of villainy to carry an accursed one by god in front of himself? Who is that infernal cunning but Satan’s Christian objectifications of perfidy ?
What honest individual with brain still can doubt that Satan has achieved being worshiped as „god“ in Christian sect?
Did he hang on the crossbeam or did not he?
Is the one that is pictured on Christian crucifixes Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ")
or is not he?
Ergo, the Bible is right: Jesus "Christ" is an accursed one by god as Satan and sin are accursed by him. Thus, it is provided evidence that the Bible of the Jews („Old Testament“) does not prove any “god’s son”, “Messiah” or even “god” of Christian sect but only a perfidious and infamous monster being accursed by god!
So, where is the contradiction concerning the variety of jobs this perfidious deformity (Jesus "Christ") claims to execute? Does Satan want to be Satan or to be “god”? However could the wishes of this „Anointed One” (Hebrew: Messiah, Greek: Christos) be else? Satan and his (Jesus) Christ pleasantly desire to be the greatest in each situation. So what, who wonders about Jesus (Satan’s) Christ’s various „presentations“ about the corporate identity of his outdoing each „humbleness“ and „modesty” the world ever had seen …?
So, where is any contradiction to reason? Does not reason say that only a monster past comprehension exalts himself to „god“ and that one has to beware of such an organize crime (Christian sect and its death penalty convict)? Does not reason say that there must be no freedom and right to commit deceits and crimes?
Who wonders about history of this sect as humankind’s most organized crime, if the henchmen of this sect carry Satan or a likewise accursed one by god in front of themselves? Only a sect of Satan that worships Satan as god can do this, in particular, can lift up an accursed one by god as its “god” …!
That is Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Satan name: Jesus "Christ" )!
That is the equal trinity of Christendo(o)m, Satan sect and organized crime!
8thly: Jesus "Christ" Satan as described by prophet Isaiah
Christian objectifications of perfidy regard Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") predicted by the Jewish prophets („Old Testament“), in particular, by prophet Isaiah. Indeed the latter predicts the Messiah of the Jews bearing the name of „Immanuel“ but not Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (see: Isa 7:14). Why does Isaiah say that the Messiah of the Jews is called “Immanuel”? The answer: So that religious rogues in frock or without frock, e.g., of the stamp of Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera cannot pass themselves off as Messiah (Greek: Christos)!
Already by his name Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") Christian sect’s instigator and impostor sufficiently is debunked as liar, deceiver and thus felons. It is unimaginable that devoted Jewish believer Mary would not had called her son “Immanuel” if those mendacious fairy tales the Christian objectifications of perfidy fabricate about his birth would be true. The name of his sufficiently convicts the (Christian) perfidious liars, deceivers, objectifications (incarnation) of perfidy and infamous terrorist.
However, there is more to it than that. What the Christian terrorists (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners") and their Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera conceal is the fact that prophet Isaiah not only predicted Messiah Immanuel of the Jews that has to suffer innocently but also Lucifer’s or the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") conquering of the world. Similarly ancient Greeks predicted that Hades (Satan) and his brother (James) will conquer one third of the universe when the era of the antique Greeks has perished. According to prophet Isaiah Lucifer and/or his Christ declare good for „evil“ and evil for „good”, lies for “truths” and truths of “lies” or the sick for “healthy” ones and healthy one for “sick” etc.
Isa 5:18 NKJV
18 ¶ Woe to those who draw iniquity with cords of vanity, And sin as if with a cart rope;
Isa 5: 20 NKJV
20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter
This is precisely the “love” of Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera and that one of his Christian objectifications of perfidy . Kicking up a fuss, they put the lastfor the „first ones“, the first for the “last ones”, the the healthy for the “the sick” and vice versa.
Hereby the even do not shrink from alleging that Satan, pardon, „god“ irresistibly dotes on all failures of nature. Conspicuously, those allegations precisely match the selfishness of those blathering and driveling that way …! Deliberately or inadvertently Aurelius Augustinus (354 – 430) the so-called “Saint August” confirms that:
"The rule of the divine providence is not distorted by ranking the unjust ones as just and the ugly as beautiful." [xv]
I see – that is what Lucifer’s (Christian name: Jesus "Christ") and all his henchmen (Christian "sinners") presume to claim for the benefit of their own! More over, what the Christian objectifications of perfidy conceal is that firstly, Messiahs Immanuel of prophet Isaiah does not resurrect after three day of being dead and secondly that Immanuel is no god! The Christian objectifications of perfidy further conceal that according to Isaiah not only Messiah Immanuel has to suffer but evenly Lucifer and his henchmen have to be slaughtered.
Isa 14: 18 – 21 NRSV
18 All the kings of the nations lie in glory, each in his own tomb;
19 but you are cast out, away from your grave, like loathsome carrion, clothed with the dead, those pierced by the sword, who go down to the stones of the Pit, like a corpse trampled underfoot.
20 You will not be joined with them in burial, because you have destroyed your land, you have killed your (Jewish) people. May the descendants of evildoers nevermore be named!
21 Prepare slaughter for his sons (fellow Christian terrorists) because of the guilt of their father (instigator Jesus "Christ" ). Let them (Christian foul players) never rise to possess the earth or cover the face of the world with cities.
Claiming that somebody allegedly or really suffered does not mean that is one is Messiah Immanuel, it evenly is could be about Lucifer or his Christ. One has to differ if it is about just sufferings of Lucifer and unjust ones of the Messiah?
What criteria Isaiah enumerates enabling us to differ between the just sufferings of Lucifer and his henchmen and the "innocent" of Messiah Immanuel? Firstly, he mentions the name „Immanuel“ and another criterion that is very significant in this context. Lucifer, who rightly is to slaughter is to realize by making himself equal to the Most High:
Isa 14:14 NRSV
14 I (Lucifer, Christian name: Jesus "Christ")
will ascend to the tops of the clouds, I will make myself like the Most High..
Mr 13:26 NRSV
Then they will see ‘the Son of Man coming in clouds’ with great power and glory.
Here, in addition one has to take into account that according to Mt 28:18, Mt 24:35 or Joh 16:15 Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Lucifer name: Jesus "Christ") make himself superior to god. However, not only by making himself superior to god but by faking to be a peer to the High Most, Lucifer is already debunked.
That means, the one that makes himself equal to the High Most means to suffer justly! Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera is already debunked as Lucifer or his Christ, viz, his Anointed One, by the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") crazy fabrication of “trinity” exalting him as a peer to the High Most. Exactly by his baloney of „trinity“ Yehoshua-ben-Pandera turns out to be Lucifer or his Christ, precisely according to prophet Isaiah he refers for evidence of all his presumptions.
Thus, the Christian objectifications of perfidy turn out as those who worship Satan and/or his Christ as „god“! That is why religiously Christian sect is Satan’s sec and by reason it Christian sect turns out to be underhand foul players’, desperadoes’ ("sinners'") or terrorists’ sect! More over, regarding the Christian “trinity” it is to remark: however else deceivers could exalt a felon of their own but by trinity.
Firstly, the have to match the imagination their victims of deceit have about god. That is the “father” in Christian goofiness. The “son” is that what he wants to make as god. Secondly, the odd number of two represents no unity but dualism like god and Satan. Therefore, Lucifer had to contrive a third thing: god’s ability to be god. That is what Lucifer calls the “holy ghost” … According to the “wisdom” of this rogue: A Christian schmuck does not only consist of being a Christian schmuck but additionally of the ability of being a Christian schmuck … That is, when Christian bastards n’ dastards or Christian Mafiosi try faking to be great philosophers …
Here, unmistakably and unambiguously we want to record: Wanting to be equal with the High Most, viz, wanting to be a peer to god debunks Lucifer and his henchmen according to Isa 14:14. Thus, „trinity“ means worshiping Satan or Lucifer as “god” and being Lucifer’s sect. That is why Satan’s sect does not speak about services for Lucifer but services for “god” … Who wonders about perfidy, insidiousness, infamy, felonies, murders, mass-murders, genocide and other atrocities of Lucifer’s sect?
Lucifer cares for spite and bestiality,
His his names are also Christ and Christianity!
According to Isa 14:14 „trinity“ is an emblem of Lucifer, comparably to the cross. From the view of reason Christianity is sect of desperados, terrorists and other scum of the Earth. Seen from religious views (Isa 14:14), it is Lucifer’s sect where the latter is worshiped as „god” …!
Hence, one never honestly can speak about an „innocent suffering of Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera, viz, of Lucifer and all his henchmen (Christian). Lucifer and his Christian objectifications of perfidy
are used to kicking up a fuss about self-pity because they have to suffer severely of their bad conscience that always makes them looking for scapegoats. According to Isa 14:12 – the prophet Yehoshua-Ben-Pandera and the Christian objectifications of perfidy mostly refer for sham-evidence of all their lies and deceits, both, the Yehoshua and the Christian objectifications of perfidy belong with the slaughter.
Now, let us carefully scrutinize why: “… because of the guilt of their father (instigator Jesus "Christ"). Let them (Christians) never rise to possess the earth or cover the face of the world with cities” (ibid.).
Obviously prophet Isaiah foresaw all the Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") atrocities, in particular, in the European Middle Ages, Christian terrorists' ("sinners'") enslaving of America, especially that on Central and South America. However, Lucifer’s sect even today is full of underhand foul players’ power. Is not Isaiah a great prophet! Did not he predict that felons’ and Lucifer’s sect? In addition, does not he clue an effective way how to prevent from the crimes of Lucifer’s sect?
Pertaining to the faked "deity" of Jesus "Christ" as well the latter as his fellow Christian deceivers got themselves tangled up in hopeless contradictions. However could it be else among deceivers?! That is what we are about to demonstrate in detail, now.
Fobbing off that misshapen cripple Jesus "Christ" -- as ugly and depraved as Satan and as sin, so that the Christian objectifications of perfidy felt force to conceal his outward appearance (while preserving an alleged shroud of his stuntman's execution!!!) -- as "god" on the world, until today, that really is one most abomination those perfidious (Christian) folks ever could presume to perpetrate...!
There is much at stake about the topic we are going to point out, right now. It is about Jesus’ and the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'")“counterfeit money”, by which the “bought”, i.e., swindled, all they possess and they are buying all they will ever keep. Their "counterfeited money" is their fake being on good terms with god.
However, the "god" they are on good terms that allegedly even is the instigator or "founder" of their sect, Jesus "Christ" , is nothing but a "golden calf" or homemade "god" of their own, i.e., a sham-god with sham-truths, sham-morals, sham-love, sham-saints etc. It is the most abominable part of the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") deception.
When Jesus gave up his miserable life as young daily worker in Egypt he was torn whatever career he should start for himself, i.e., as what figure he should pose in a sect he was going to instigate.
Except the principle to aim high at most as possible, there was no durable job he was striving for. Priest, apostle, prophet, Messiah, God's son, God, God's guardian or even God’s father - each he was aspiring quite corresponding to the intelligence, respectively imbecility and education of his auditory. Each claiming this or that about Jesus and stabbing to death his Christian or non-Christian rival for one’s "truth" --what the Christian objectifications of perfidy
are used to perpetrating when they are able to do as they like (the Christian terrorists' lifestyle!) -- can call “one’s” Jesus to witness.
For instance, if somebody today claims his version of Jesus’ job, e.g., as “god’s”son equal to the nature of god as the right one from the very beginning, then he confuses the results of the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") stabbing to death among one another with the historical truth.
Among terrorists and barbarians – evenly pertaining to the sector of these heinous sects – only the most infamous, barbarous and abominable ones succeed. So evenly among Christian objectifications of perfidy ! How could it be else?
When presenting our method of examination in the preliminaries of this treatise, we said that we do not adopt Christian terrorists (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners") conditioning that Jesus is "dear", ”sweat hearted", “correctly " and "good" etc. and all the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") barbarities, atrocities, genocide and abominations just are misappropriations of the alleged good “tenets” of Jesus.
In contrast with that, we said that we would investigate Jesus' messages also with regard to the question, whether there are contradictions structured by Jesus himself in the so-called „glad tidings“, so that the quarrels, warfare, stabbing, other barbarities and terrorism among his adherent have been going to erupt within a certain delay of time. i.e., that the erupting have very known Christian quarrels and barbarities about their doctrines (e.g., is Jesus god or not etc.) only had been just a matter of time.
That means further, that they didn’t came into being because of the adherents’ wickedness or their “weakness of the flesh“ but primarily and necessarily because of Jesus’ contradictions, deficiencies, shortcomings and the difficulties he had to face by deceiving and lying. Therefore, they primarily came into being at first because of his Jesus’) depravity and maliciousness and secondly because those traits of his henchmen.
If each on can “engineer” its Jesus because of the variety of contradiction Jesus himself caused and that are accounted in the chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") -- as we are going to demonstrate now. Christian sect finally established a resolution or decree pertaining to one of a variety of possibilities, e.g., that Jesus is a son of “god” of equal nature to the “god”.
This arbitrary act was perpetrated in the Nicene council in 325 C.E.. However, what the depraved Christian objectifications of perfidy have been refusing since that council is that the objections to their arbitrariness of 325 C.E. (resolution or decree) are not substantiated by the maliciousness of the" heretics" but by (the contradiction of) Jesus himself, who then primarily is responsibly for the following stabbing, slaughters and barbarities of the Christian religious rogues against each other and their non-Christian rivals (You shall know Jesus by its fruit, i.e., Christian sect!). Below we are going to point out why most Christian objectifications of perfidy want Jesus to fly high as most as possible and just endorse and foster his megalomania.
There are two names for the Christian terrorists' (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners'") slaughters in question: Arius and Athanasius. Both were Christian clergies in the beginning of the fourth century in Alexandria (Egypt). The one said Jesus is no god (Arius), the other one told that he was
(son of) god (Athanasius). There were a lot of stabbing, blending, slaughtering and prying about this question among those „peaceful“ and„loveable“ Christian objectifications of perfidy . Ah, ah, ah...!
It is quite conspicuous that the disappearing of approximately hundred so-called apocryphal gospels -- that were rediscovered in 1945 in Nag Hammadi (Egypt) -- temporarily coincides with the quarrels and slaughters among the followers of Arius and Athanasius. As said, the Nicene council decided in favor of the most extreme deceiver Athanasius, i.e., that Jesus was “god” or “god's son” with an equal nature to the “god”.
Since then, the arguments of those who are in favor of Jesus as human being are bad when referring to the Nicene council but as good as those of their opponents, if not better, when referring to the chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") of the Christian bible. However, that does not change the matter that those, who point out another possible understanding of Jesus from the Christian chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") have to be prepared for battering, torments, torture, withdrawal of their basis of existence or even murder by the cruel and hypocritical Christian leaders (slaveholders).
Obviously that removal is in context with Christian sect’s cleaning according to the Nicene decree of" trinity”.
Claiming that Jesus was "god” or an associate of “god”, what the Christian terrorists (Christians' cant: "innocent sinners") understand by their “term”of "god's son", means nothing but knuckle under to psycho-terrorists and terrorists, in particular to the success of their terror. However, it has nothing to do with truths, a word the Christian objectifications of perfidy are used to juggling in order to camouflage their lies, deceits, psycho-terror and terrorism.
When claiming to be everything, the one and its reverse, then Jesus inadvertently and indirectly assures only to be a deceiver. So, if the one Christian claims this and if, on the other hand, his inveterately hated competitor or rival claims the contrary -- then, both rightly had or have their Jesus. Jesus Satan's) Christ provided both with arguments; so far, one can call that drivel arguments. As usual among barbarians and terrorists, the most extreme and abominable liars, swindlers and brutes had their way.
Among devils, always the most heinous ones win.
Nobody but Jesus himself was and is the cause, the germ and the fuel of the stabbing, the slaughters and otherbarbarities or abominations among Christian objectifications of perfidy . He even deliberately wanted to stir up quarrels, divisions and fighting of all against each other:
Lu 12:49 RSV
"Icame to cast fire upon the earth; and would that it were already kindled!
Lu 12:51-52 RSV
Do you think that I have come togive peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division;
52 for henceforth in one house there will be five divided, three against two and two against three;
Jesus said, "Shall destroy this house, and no one will be able to (rebuild it[...]."[xvi]
That is an attitude very typical of terrorists and of the instigator of Christian terrorism, anyway. Nobody shall have a good life any longer, because this spiteful little devil did not had one! By the word of „house“ entire humankind and the world is meant.
Jesus several times avowed terrorism and he and his perfidious schmucks (the Christian sinners) impressively suited the action to the word. Christendo(o)m
– that’s a paragon of psycho-terror and terror! Jesus himself has sowed the germs of destruction andmurder among his Christian objectifications of perfidy and humankind. The fertile soil the sower found are those similar depraved ones to him, i.e., his Christian insidious schmucks.
Man’s deceiver never agreed with himself as what he should pose at best within his deception: Whether as schmuck of priest, apostle, prophet, Paraclete
, “god’s” son, “god”, man’s son, “god’s” guardian, i.e., as a superior "god” within Christian polytheism or even as father of “god”….
Here, a lot is at stake: It is about the counterfeit money of that sect of infamy!
Finally, the Christian objectifications of perfidy ' ("sinners'") deceit was that far reaching that the winners of the Nicene vote, who named the instigator of that terrorists’ sect a “god” or an associate of the “god” (i.e.," god's” son), declared all the chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") to be bogus (apocryphal that contradict their views). That is the way the Christian extremists and terrorists cared for the „evidence“ of their lies.
While doing this, they
ridiculously had the presumption to canonize of one and same individual (John) a gospel naming Jesus to be “god” and, on the other hand, they evenly indexed an epistle of him (The first epistle of John) to their so-called “New Testament” that describes Jesus solely as a Paraclete (that is something like an advocate or comforter) as we are going to prove below. In the following, we will demonstrate, how man'sdeceiver (Jesus) sometimes passed himself off as this and the other moment as quite something else, always corresponding to the degree of education, respectively imbecility of each audience. "Blessed are the poor in spirit“ (Mt 5:3) because one easily can pull the wool over their eyes…
knifers and murderers as well as the stabbed and/or murdered ones -- i.e., the perpetrators as well as their victims -- among Christian objectifications of perfidy
therefore have their Jesus – whatever they claim, what Jesus allegedly is or is not. Jesus has provided them all with corresponding “ammunition”:
To slaughter themselves in the name of him, and
b) to put the blame for those heinous barbarities always to the respective defeated rival and along with the accusation that all those barbarities and atrocities among Christian objectifications of perfidy or on non-Christian terrorists are an alleged misappropriation of the “tenets” of him (Jesus). However, they are never allowed to blame the real evildoer, who is responsible for all those Christian abominations: Jesus "Christ" …!
Jesus and his early infamous schmucks (Christian objectifications of perfidy ) did not consent what part the instigator of this sect (Jesus) shall pose within the deceit of theirs. Alleging something else means extolling the Christian terrorists’ stabbing. All - including Jesus (Satan’s). Christ – deliver contradicting versions as what man’s deceiver and man’s terrorist (Jesus) should pose in Christian sect
The different and contradictory claims about the nature of his provide evidence that at least in the beginning Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (Christian jargon: Jesus "Christ") suffered from scruples to perpetrate his crime faking to be "god" or "divine". Like Satan, the accursed one by god (De 21:23), viz, Satan’s Messiah or son wants to be the greatest as much as possible corresponding the brain, respectively moronism of his spectators: rabbi, apostle, Paraclete, prophet, man’s son, god’s son, redeemer, god etc. This ladder he climbed up and descended corresponding the brain or lacking brain of his spectators, viz, how he could hoodwink them. The more weak-minded the audience had been, the higher Jesus "Christ" wanted to fly. The more educated the audience had been, the more modest man’s deceiver (Yehoshua-ben-Pandera (gang name: Jesus "Christ")
That’s sod’s law! In view of a deceitful monster, there is no contradiction.
Finally, let us put a question: How else Satan and his henchmen ever would worm their way into their victims' confidence but in the way Jesus "Christ" and the Christians are used to doing, viz, by successfully posing as "god", "god's son, "man's son", respectively, "saints", "holy fathers", "reverends", "god's" chosen ones or "moral" whoppers? However else Satan and his "Anointed One" (Greek: Christos) could hide their hypocrisy, mendacity, perfidy, infamy, outrages, murders, mass-murders, genocide and other barbarities and abomination as Jesus "Christ" and Christian objectifications (incarnations) of perfidy are used to doing?
They call him god and Jesus "Christ" ,
This spiteful little devil and Satan's catamite!
PREVIOUS | HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS ||NEXT| NEWS | THE CROSS DECEPTION| WHAT DID JESUS LOOK LIKE? | THE (STOLEN) STAR OF BETHLEHEM | MY STUFF
©2002 HANS HENNING ATROTT - All rights reserved.- Reproduction only for private use and/or purposes of studying and archiving by research and/or library institutes - otherwise without permission strictly prohibited. This site is still under construction -
For details see:http://www.bare-jesus.net/d401.htm
The Apocryphon of James, From Ron Cameron, The Other Gospels Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1982),http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/jam2.html
as quoted in Willis Barnstone, The Other Bible (Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1984), on:
[iii] Even if Christian here should argue that this gospel allegedly is non-authentic – finally they wanted to get rid of it for ever! – then even if this would be correct, nevertheless the evidence is produced that the early Christian terrorists
precisely knew for what purpose of selfishness, i.e., deception, the Christian “faith” was about, it is about and ever will be about!
[v]see: Hans Hans Atrott, "Eunuch" Jesus caught with naked Man in the Act " on: http://www.bare-jesus.net/evorwort.htm, http://www.bare-jesus.net/e703.htm
[vi] “The world came about through a mistake. For he who created it wanted to create it imperishable and immortal. He fell short of attaining his desire.”
(The Gospel of Philip) on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gop.html
[vii] For more information about this topic see: http://bare-jesus.net/birthofjesus/enindex.htm
[x] The Gospel of Thomas, ibidem. Logion 77
[xi] T he Apocryphon of James, ibidem
[xii] The Gospel of Thomas, ibidem, Logion 13
[xiii] The Gospel of Thomas, ibidem, Logion 7
Aurelius Augustinus, de vera religione, XXXIV (63), Translation from the Latin by my own: Latin text: “Nec ideo divinae providentiae administratio minus decora fit; quia et iniusti iuste, et foedi pulchre ordinantur”. I did not found an electronic edition in English of this writing. The Latin text electronically is published on: http://www.santagostino.it/latino/vera_religione/vera_religione_libro.htm, last call on: 03/29/2008
The Gospel of Thomas, Translated by Thomas O. Lambdin, Logion 71,on: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html