The Invincible Terrorists' Criminal Record

On March 12, 2000, the Christian pope first time partly admitted the crimes and terror of the Christians, unscrupulously denied for about two millennia. So, now it is the 13th anniversary of it.


Hans Atrott

Author of the books "Jesus' Bluff - The Universal Scandal of the World" and "Cross and Crime"

Although the confession only is a partly one,

·        firstly, being able to perpetrate such atrocities without indignation of the public, not to mention punishment,

·        secondly, denying them for such long a period while feigning to be “martyrs for the truths” and,

·        thirdly, while being regarded as “upholders of moral standards” despite that terror beyond bounds

is the evidence of being invincible terrorists. Early Christian terrorist Aurelius Augustinus (dubbed: “St. Augustine," 354-430 C.E.) “advises": “…invictus homo est qui cohaeret Deo…” (In English: “The invincible human tags along with god”)…[1] The admission of March 12, 2000, proves that the aim of invincibility is achieved. Early Christians argued for their terrorism in the following way:  “Jesus came to crucify the world." [2]. No belief in god but the desire to make oneself invincible as a criminal and terrorist (dubbed:  a sick needing a physician[3]) produces a Christian, in particular, a Christian clergy! For this purpose, the Christians make a “god” of their own whom they call “Jesus Christ."  In the same way, in which the Christians call “Jesus Christ” “god," they also can call Satan “god”… Who knows that they do not do so? They demonstrably deny a lot, even for millennia…!  


Certainly, the knowledge of Paris Hilton – one also does not know for what she is famous -- about the universe is better than the one of this impostor: 

“For the earth does not move. Were it to move, it would fall. But it neither moves nor falls…[4]  

My word, what an “omniscient” fake of “god”…!  Nevertheless, his demands were megalomaniac out of bounds while perfidiously lying “humbleness”:

Joh 10:8 NRSV “All (Adam, Eve, Moses, Isaiah, King David, King Augustus, the inventor of the wheel, letters or geometry, Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle etc.)  who came before me are thieves and bandits…”

Demonstrably, Jesus anti-Christ and his fellow terrorists (by a psychological projection) serve the thieves and bandits… What humans are, they do not owe to the Christians and their deified top terrorists, but to those which he calls “thieves and bandits”!  

Joh 9:31 NRSV

31 We know that God does not listen to sinners…

Ben-Pandera (dubbed: “Jesus Christ”) “solved” this problem by self-forgiveness. Joh 20:23 “If you (Christian terrorists) forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained."  If god does not comply with the terrorists’ desires, they do it themselves…! This lied “authority” of remising sins without the victims’ consent is decisive to become invincible criminals and/or terrorists. If veracity at present purportedly has broken out in Christianity, the Christians now should tell us how they can claim that Ben-Pandera died for the sins (terror and crimes) of the Christian terrorists on the gallows or cross if:

·       Firstly, god does not listen to the sinners (see: Joh 9:31).

·       Secondly, no god but Christian terrorists is, respectively, are necessary for remission of sins (see: Joh 20:23)…

·       Thirdly, why did the sentenced felon need to die on the cross if his accomplices arbitrarily can forgive or retain the sins of others (see: Joh 20:23), in addition, without the victims’ consent…?

·       Fourthly, why do the popes -- starting from the third millennium -- need an “ominous”  “Holy Father: Lord God” [5] for remission of sins if they can forgive everything themselves…? Apparently, they know that those “authorities” are perfidies of foul mouths…

Certainly, on account of the pretended “authority” of remising sins arbitrarily (see: Joh 20:23), all the “infallible” pope-terrorists before the third millennium saw a contradiction if asking someone else but themselves for forgiveness. However, how else but in that way, one could cant the shame and ignominy of a megalomaniac and loser desiring to be a “god” and acceding to the throne of his country (“King of Israel," Joh 12:13) but who became “invited” to the gallows or cross…?

In order to get to the gist of the newly fussed “honesty” and “truthfulness” of the Christians, we refer to one of the many sorts of the crimes that are not mentioned in the “frank repentance” of March 12, 2000. On May 21st, 2009, “The Daily Mail" writes:

“About 35,000 children and teenagers who were orphans, petty thieves, truants, unmarried mothers or from dysfunctional families were sent to Ireland's network of 250 Church-run industrial schools, reformatories, orphanages and hostels from the 1930s up until the early 1990s. The report by Ireland's Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse found 'a climate of fear, created by pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment, permeated most of the institutions and all those run for boys'. It added: 'Children lived with the daily terror of not knowing where the next beating was coming from.'"[6] “The report found that molestation and rape were 'endemic' in boys' facilities, chiefly run by the Christian Brothers order.”[7]

'Girls were struck with implements designed to maximize pain and were struck on all parts of the body…”[8] by the Christian terrorists always “confessing” their “sinfulness” while perfidiously  pretending to be “martyrs” being unable even to hurt a fly… This verbatim called terror was perpetrated between 1930 and 1990. If somebody at that time called the Christians terrorists, the latter exhorted him that one has to go back to centuries ago in order to convict the Christians of terrorism… Christian terrorism always is called a matter of the past since the one at present successfully either is imputed to the enemies, concealed or fobbed off as “love," “charities," and “selfless commitment to one’s next” etc.…

One of the Christian terrorists obsessed with crucifying the world caught a pupil entrusted to him for “education," grabbed his arm, twisted it behind his back winding it around and around until it broke on three places.[9] However, this was not the full program of his “god’s” terror to crucify the world. Now, he started to apply the sayings of Jesus anti-Christ:

“But no one can enter a strong man’s house and plunder his property without first tying up the strong man; then indeed the house can be plundered (Mr 3:27).”  The successful crucifier or terrorist first has to make his victims defenseless in order to take out his vindictive terror on them, according to his depraved heart’s desire. Now, with a broken arm, the pupil could not defend himself. Otherwise, the Christian dastard, i.e. one of the weak, possibly even would have lost against the pupil. Then, the terrorist or crucifier started the program of Christian crucifixion (dubbed: “love”) on him. He took a broom and beat the boy all over his body until the blood squirted.[10]  The victim was defenseless and so the Christian criminal and/or terrorist invincible. Nobody dared to report this terror to the police because everybody rightly was afraid of experiencing the same crucifixion by the Christian terrorists (perfidiously dubbed as “the martyrs”). The Christian policemen perhaps only would have laughed at the complaints or would have jailed the victims for insulting the “martyrs of the truths” (known for their perfidies of “meekness," “mercy” and “non-violence” etc.)…  In prison, the victims certainly would have been commanded to whine and wail that Jesus anti-Christ purportedly unfairly became tortured by the Jews, some years ago and likely had to kiss the rings of the terrorist that tormented them…

The Christian terrorists could perpetrate their terror about 35.000 times in Ireland[11]  and much more elsewhere since they succeed in becoming invincible criminals and terrorists. They are used to manipulating their victims to misjudge their terrorism or crucifixion as “charities," “love," “martyrdom” and “mercy” and their megalomania as “modesty” and “humbleness" etc.  Those perfidies make them invincible. Now, the Western media exorbitantly wail: “…that when confronted with evidence of sex abuse … (the Christian) authorities responded by moving the sex offenders to another location, where in many instances, they were free to abuse again.”[12] Why are the Western media indignant about that relocation of the sexual felons? The answer: They know that Christian leadership hereby provides new fresh flesh, i.e. victims, to their perpetrators and hence it enables the restart of the sexual felonies!  However, Western media commit something very similar. If it were about the Christian rivals, e. g., the Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims or Scientologists  committing  such abhorrent and disgusting felonies, the Christian terrorists and their media would not stop hollering to forbid any right of educating children for them, unless they cried  for prohibiting those religions. Why? The answer: They know that such crimes and terror are within the scope of their behavior. Nevertheless, pertaining to Christians, they accept that children further become handed over as prey to the predators (for crucifixion).  What would the same individuals say if a judge would acquit a serial killer and/or sexual felon having raped and murdered many children and women by arguing in the following way?: “After having denied everything, i.e. lied, for a long time, the defendant declared: ‘Your honor, I am a martyr for the truth, and hence I promise I’ll not do those felonies, any longer.’ Consequently, the murderer was not only to acquit and but also is to revere as the martyr for the truths…That is what Western media do pertaining to Christian sect while hollering about purported or real terror of Christian competitors…   The Western media of today only see the danger that a convicted Christian felon will re-perpetrate his crimes but still are intimidated to draw the same inference pertaining to Christian sect... One never can entrust children to individuals having turned out as such disgusting felons! Christian crimes do not grow on trees ….

There is no more efficient promotion of crimes and terror, but by the Christian chronicles (dubbed: “gospels”).   For being worshiped as “god," in exchange, Ben-Pandera offers to each of his fellow terrorists to play god themselves, for example,  

·       by feigning the “authority” of “forgiving sins” (without the victims’ consent!) to each of his accomplices (see: Joh 20:23) …!

·       The allegation that he died on the cross for the terrorists’ terror (dubbed: “sins”) is an excellent promotion for crimes, criminals, terrorism and terrorists. It means that each crime and terror purportedly are forgiven, already before being perpetrated…!

·       The fussy concern about “sins” and “sinners” in Christianity is nothing but the perpetrators’ protection. What else are “sinners”?

·       There is no concern with the victims, unless the Christian terrorists perfidiously feign being the “victims," or sham the “martyrs for the truths” …! Since, the victims are not asked if they want to forgive or not – even not in the admission of March 12, 2000 -- who wonders about the Christians’ terrorist record and the lies about it, for millennia?

·       Ben-Pandera (dubbed: “Jesus Christ”) knows that he only can design unscrupulous and ruthless, i.e. invincible, terrorists by eliminating the bad conscience of theirs.

·       Therefore, his top concern is the removal of the bad conscience of his fellow terrorists by arbitrary forgiveness of sins. So, the dregs of humankind assist him to crucify the world.  

·       Sayings like the mentioned one of Joh 20:23 are a license for crimes and terror for “the sick needing a physician”[13] and no physician can help[14], i.e. the dregs of all humankind.  

Ben-Pandera (dubbed: “Jesus Christ”) invented the invincible criminals and terrorists! He saw that a felon can commit each crime and terror if perpetrated under the (“moral”) pretense of a “religion” and allegedly serving “morals” and “god”…   On account of the lied competence to forgive sins of others without the victims’ consent, the (Christian) terrorists even do not need to care about a bad conscience. Hence, the roughly 270 popes before the ones of the third millennia saw no reason to ask for forgiveness.

·       Why should they refrain from crimes and terror if they can forgive everything themselves (see: Joh 20:23)?

·       Why should they ask for remission if they can do it themselves?

Western media continuously are obsessed with lifting the pope and Christian sects, i.e. their “upholders of their moral standards," to those, standards which are a matter of course even to Paris Hilton. Nevertheless, they try obliging their fellow citizens to revere the world’s top unscrupulous terrorists[15] and ruthless liars…


Hans Atrott




[1] Augustinus, de vera religione, 90,  electronically published:, last call 12/02/2011


[2] The Gospel of Philip, NHC II: 3, Translated by Wesley W. Isenberg, saying 53,   Selection made from James M. Robinson, ed., The Nag Hammadi Library, revised edition. HarperCollins, San Francisco, 1990, on:, last call: 03/07/2013

[3] See: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10

[4] Ben-Pandera (dubbed: “Jesus Christ”, according to “The Dialogue of the Savior”, Translated by Stephen Emmel, electronically published:, last call: 03/06/2013

[5] See:  Sacred Heart University – Center For Christian-Jewish Understanding, Pope John Paul II asks for Forgiveness, (March 12, 2000), in the following quoted as  “The „Christians“’ criminal record of March 12, 2000”, electronically published:, last call: 01/23/2012

[7] Ibidem

[8] Ibidem

[9] See: Ibidem

[10] See: Ibidem

[11] “The Daily Mail” of 05/21/2009, ibidem

[12] Ibidem

[13] See: Mt 9:12, Mr 2:17, Lu 5:31-32, Lu 19:10

[14] See: Mt 7:17-18, Lu 6:43, Joh 8:34

[15] See:  Sacred Heart University – Center For Christian-Jewish Understanding, Pope John Paul II asks for Forgiveness, ibidem