Summary of the Christians and Germans crime on Atrott as euthanasia activist

VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA IF CRIMINALS DETERMINE "MORALS"

Survey and Summary of the Crimes of Christian Dastards and German Bastards on Atrott as Presidentof German Voluntary Euthanasia Society

How the Christians hogged voluntary Euthanasia as a new Protection Money Zone by another ConstantineHeist, in Germany

Shame on Germany!

CHRISTIANITY - THE "HUMAN RIGHT" OF CRIMINALITY!


Click on the picture!

Those who wonder about what they are going to report here, first should remember that Christian sect needs about 2000 years in order to admit its crimes and abominations, partly. Before being enraptured about such a "repentance", one should think about the premises of the possibility of being able to lie implacably about one's crimes stinking to high heavens for about 2000 years. The premises require that the concerned are the planet's top successful as top unscrupulous liars and ruthless deceivers, nobody can outdo. By that admittance after about two millennia,(criminality of) Christianity indirectly and inadvertently admitted contumaciously lying about its crimes because of the criminal nature of this negative selection of individuals, i.e. Christians, which on top of everything perfidiously are used to bragging about being "martyrs of the love". Christians never show mercy if it is about to catch prey, respectively, to secure the once caught prey for themselves. This following account time and again shows the ruthless foul play of (criminality of) Christianity to keep their preys caught, at any price and at all costs... We do not wait for two millennia to debunk the crimes   of Christianity reported in the following. We do it closed to the time when those criminal dastards perfidiously perpetrate their foul play.

Right from the start, it should be made clear:
1.) the author did not sell potassium cyanide but performed legal voluntary euthanasia with thischemical.
2.) The author's kind of euthanasia was the best in the world and even was screened by a Spanishmovie maker awarded by an Oscar an L. A. in 2005.
3.) The world's best euthanasia even was the top cost-effective one. Everybody who triedsucceeding the author ("Dignitas", Hamburg's senator Kusch) charged much more for that than the author did.

Christian euthanasia - no fictive one but really perpetrated as a rule. Do not forget that those rogues with frocks and without frocks desire to teach you "morals". Mafiosi demand to be set for shoplifters...

In 1978, the then German federal government made an inquiry whether Germany should establishhospices for the dying as they already existed in the U.K., then. Christian big sects (argot: churches) declined the need of such facilities, in the main withridiculous "arguments". At that time, the Christian dastards were convinced to impede such institutions of humanity and compassion bycapitalizing on the Nazis' atrocities to which they contributed a lot. In the U.K., criminality of Christianity already became challenged by a strongvoluntary Euthanasia association, already in the 1930ties.

"Its (Christian church's) deepest necessities range it against any effort to abolish distress; it lives by distress; itcreates distress to make itself immortal. . . . (Friedrich Nietzsche)

By the way, sexuality and euthanasia are the last scopes of the Christian dastards totorment humans under "moral" pretense. The crime of murder of all crimes of murder (see: declaration of the pope-desperado from March 12, 2000)desires to lie itself as "protectors of lives" ("Pro life") while posing against euthanasia...

On November 7, 1980 the author founded D.G.H.S. (German society for dying with dignity). Its goalwas each kind of euthanasia as far as a) it was expedient and b) wanted by the concerned. The decked-out Mafiosi finally had to realize being completely wrongpertaining to most important things of human life and so on voluntary euthanasia. Now, it was their aim to regain the lost grounds caused by thewrong judgment, again in the very Christian (criminal) way by stopping at nothing.

Already in the year 1985, viz, five years after the foundation of D.G.H.S. Christian desperadoes wanting Christian hospices tried an insurgenceto clamp down my leadership of D.G.H.S. based by democratic elections. The dastards once more and again turned out as that what they are: the born loseralways losing if keeping to fair play. Hereby, they took the lesson that even here they only can succeed in the very Christian way: by foul mouth and foulplay, in particular, by the latter.

Crime no. 1: Infringement of Jurisdiction

In 1984, the author performed voluntary euthanasia in a clinic of a nationally known Germanprofessor of medicine in Southern Bavaria. It became known that the author performed it by a chemical (potassium cyanide). The local court of Traunstein and later the superior court of Munich examined this case of euthanasia and realized everything as complying with German laws(1 WS 23/1987 v. 31.7.1987, NJW Copy No. 46/1987). In view of those verdicts of both courts the author could infer legality of his euthanasia. On February 17,1992 the Christianly conditioned investigator tells the German magazine “DER SPIEGEL”, verbatim: “the mirror” (of German clumsy oafs):

„For selling cyanide, we cannot indict Atrott. Catching him by the taxes, the police first has to find out buyers. This is hard to do...[i]

This means that the Christians knew that the investigation and later condemnation because ofperforming euthanasia with chemicals on me was illegal. As each Mafiosi is used to doing, they tried abiding by the law as long as “the sect of hope” believedreaching their pernicious goals by abiding by the law. If not, felons, Mafiosi and terrorists resort to crimes in order to snatch that what they cannot attainif keeping to fair play. When realizing that there is no legal way to eliminate the fiend of the organized crime (thieves’ cant: Christianity) the Christiandastards did what they can best: goading others into crimes for the profit of criminality of Christianity.

Suddenly, the country court of Augsburg whose incumbents were contumacious Christian dastards,declared this performance of euthanasia as being against German laws, indeed, according to the desperadoes' top credo: "faith shifts mountains"(see: Mt 17:20) and the truths, anyway. As being subordinated to the superior court of Munich it as obliged to comply with the Munich jurisdiction and therefore, behave according to criminal covered by Christian media mud... If an inferior court does not accept thejurisdiction of a superior court in Germany, it has to submit the case to the supreme court in Germany. The Christian criminal dastards in a judge's robe didnot do it. Even, if the supreme court in Germany would have sided with the Christian criminals in Augsburg, the latter even could not convict me since,after the verdict of Munich, by good faith I could infer acting legally. This assumedly is the reason why the Christian Mafiosi of Augsburg in the judge’scoat did not submit this case to the federal (supreme) court. The goal of change the “regime” in a private association that was unfavorable incriminality of Christianity was not to achieve, even when resorting to (legal) procedure. The only way criminality of Christianity could get its way time andagain were committing crimes, and that is what the Christian criminals did! By semantic simulations (lying by concepts), very typical of Christian, the dastards lied their kidnapping as"imprisonment on remand" or even as "love on the enemy"...

Crime no. 2:
Break of the Law concerning Imprisonment on Remand

According to the then law an imprisonment on remand for whatever reason only was possible forthe maximum lapse of six months. The Christian-German bastards, respectively, dastards kidnapped me for about one year. This is an additional crime ofinfringement of law by the Germans and Christians. Apparently, the bastards & dastards kept me kidnapped that long since they were not sure whether thenew leadership of D.G.H.S. established in the wake and for that criminality will stay if the author is freed after six months. The new"leadership" of D.G.H.S. established by the putsch of the Christian German state against a private association neither did demand to finish theillegal apprehension of the author nor the illegal lapse of it, not to mention, to keep to fair play. On the contrary, they always capitalized on the crimesagainst the association's founder. Those perfidious figures even tried vilifying the founder, for instance, by perfidiously lamenting: "The longimprisonment on remand" of that "criminal". In that way, the then and current leadership of the association tries canting their theft on thefounder.

Crime no. 3
(Illegal) Extortion of Witnesses

The Christian criminals within the Christian Bavarian authorities wanted to present witnessesagainst the author which only legal performances of euthanasia (see: mentioned verdict of the Superior Court of Munich) could have witnessed. As far as it wasabout evasion of taxes, all witnesses had a right to refuse to give evidence. The authorities even were obliged to inform the witnesses about their rights.They did not only do that but wanted to present them (by breaking the law). If there would have been tax evasion, then the witnesses would have committedaiding in that offense. Nobody is obliged to charge itself. Of course, the German authorities insist on this crime of aiding tax evasion if it is aboutforeign banks they do not like. By the way, nobody of them could have said having given money to me. Partly, the German authorities, very typical ofChristian, goaded the witnesses into giving false testimony, by telling them if they "witness" having passed all the money to me, then it is aboutthe author's tax evasion. Otherwise, the "witnesses" have to pay the taxes.... The aim of the German bastards instigated by Christian dastards wasto drive me to suicide in order to a) get rid of me and b) of any evidence about their criminality. The verdict on me is not based on evidence but on adeal. Those who are kidnapped have to comply with the crimes of the kidnappers in order to get freed. The author agreed to the deal in order to save his lifeand the lives of members of his family. The authorities made this deal, since they thought having got an agreement of the author for their crimes issufficient coverage of "love" of the enemy, etc. to them.

Moreover, the following is to mention: The Christian dastards and German bastards first triedabiding by German law. In August 1992, the rogues with frocks apprehended the author the first time for purported non taxed sum of ca. 200.000 DM (ca.100.000€). However, then they got the idea that because of a lot of comparable cases known to the public, they could not kidnap the author without becoming debunkedas (criminal) kidnapper. For instance, there is an international very known German tennis star who became convicted of having evaded 20 million Deutschmark (about 10 million Euros). He never became apprehended for that and was not one day in jail. This has already conclusively proven the criminal intentionsof the German bastards instigated by Christian dastards. The rogues with frocks freed me a few years later bail about the amount of money it purportedly was about. After having kidnapped me thefirst time in August 1992, they got the idea that -- on account of too very known comparable cases -- a punishment of jailing is not expecting. However,the Christian impostors knew that they cannot defeat the author as long as he can defend himself. This was the lesson they took from their first insurgencein the year 1985, when the dastards from the Christian hospices hostile wanted to take over D.G.H.S. presided by the author.
Mr 3:27 NRSV
27 But no one can enter a strong man’s house and plunder his property
without first tying up the strong man; then indeed the house can be plundered.
Mt 12:29 NRSV
29 Or how can one enter a strong man’s house and plunder his property,
without first tying up the strong man? Then indeed the house can be plundered.

Having failed to get rid of the author by the cheap trick of purported "tax evasion", theChristian dastards and their German biological robot now made up their mind to infringe the law, i.e. to commit crimes by concealing the jurisdictiondeclaring the euthanasia the author performed as legal. One can see that Christians not by dicing but for lust for powers are criminals.
The crimes on the author the global Mafia perpetrated according to their book of criminal tricks (thieves' cant: "Holy Writ"):

2Pe 2:12 NKJV
But these (extremely “beloved” enemies of the Christians are) like natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed…
A sect lying such instigation and intents of murder and mass-murder is noreligion but an organized crime wanting to make itself unassailable by feigning "god" as an accomplice of it and being a "religion"...

The Lesson from this story? Once more, Christianity proves that it always loses when keeping to fair play and that it tricks n' shifts that by a foul mouth andfoul play what are sour grapes to it when keeping to fair play. Once more, Christianity proved that it is about a negative selection of dastards andbastards, i.e. the dregs of humankind. Again, it turns out being the top threat to humankind because it destroys the human's social existence. The latter isbased on good faith and fair play, whereas Christianity replaces good faith by perfidy and fair play by foul play. This makes Christianity the top threat tothe human's social existence.

Christianity was, is and will ever stay in criminality! Each, who supports Christianity hereby debunks himself as a criminal  (so Roman Emperor Julian 332-363).

PREVIOUS| IND EX | ENGLISHINDEX | HOME |  NEWS | THE CROSS CRIMINALS | CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRIST |   NEXT |