The (cribbed) Star of Bethlehem

5th Part, § 1

The purported Birth in the Bethlehem Stable, despite all  Lies very symbolical for the Shoddy

 

As pdf, zip or exe

 

 

Experience teaches: The more the disgrace is, the more the desperadoes are used to faking "excellence"...
Christians attempted not only to steal the date but also of the contents of the Christmas tale from Mithras religion. That the lies of narration about the birth of the Christian barbarism’s head are much farther reaching than to the mentioned hidden theft of elements of the pagan Mithras religion is proofed by the alleged birth in Bethlehem. (In the previous chapter) it has been already demonstrated that according to the religion of the magicians the redeemers is born on a victory mountain and not in a stable among shit of cows, goats, sheep and hens). Moreover, Jesus had to be born stealthily and secretly due to the shameful adultery of Mary with a Roman mercenary we are going to spell out.
 


Click on the picture

Contact


The (false) view that a child begotten by adultery is about a disgrace even was propagated by the Christian barbarians later on and much more than ever before. (Just well programmed Christian robots believe that the god mated Mary). Folks of those days knew that Mary committed adultery, as Joseph himself knew it. That is why Joseph -- even according to the Christian gospels– deliberated to leave Mary. A stable among shit of cows, goats, sheep and hens, this is the due place of Satan's catamite or Christ but not for god's one, regardless whatever the Christian phonies try contriving excuses for canting this ignominy stinking to high heavens!). Moreover, Jesus had to be born stealthily and secretly due to the shameful adultery of Mary with a Roman mercenary we are going to spell out.
 

Mt 1:19 RSV        

19 and her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly.

 

The well-conditioned Christian robots believe those lies they are programmed to believe so. According to the method of criminal investigation, it is to notice, that the Christians’ “god’s” word could not perfectly be fabricated in the sense of those lies and deceits about Ben-Pandera's shameful begetting and birth. There is still sufficient evidence that even the place of the birth (Bethlehem) is nothing but a lie:
According to John 7:42 most of his Jewish fellows declined to acknowledge him as promised savior because the Jewish savior (Messiah) is told to be born in Bethlehem and that indirectly proves that he had not been born in Bethlehem:


John 7:42 RSV

42 Has not the scripture said that the Christ is descended from David, and comes from Bethlehem, the village where David was?"

Here, the mask falls down that the Christian sect’s instigator (Jesus) whom his fellow desperadoes lift as their "god"
· firstly, never was born in Bethlehem and that this
· secondly, at that time, it was common knowledge that the Christians' tales about his birth are untrue.
 

Here once more we can demonstrate what the method of criminal investigation means. A lie is some kind of creation of a new world because in the consequent links of it, one can notice that it is discordant to remaining contexts. Therefore, the liar always has to watch how he has to construct the other contexts according to his lies – and there is nobody perfect. The less shrewd a liar is, the sooner one gets him in the consequent links of a lie. Moreover, that is why the liar, mostly is very aggressive because he always fears to be caught in a consequent link of his lie.

Besides, those are the reasons for Christian barbarity, cruelty and atrocities because they always are afraid of truths. Intolerance is nothing else but being afraid of truths. That is why there is the saying in English: Truth will be out or lies have short wings. Here, the Christian gospel writer fails to see that they also had had to doctor their “glad tiding” according to their lies about the birth of their foremost impostor (Jesus). If they wanted to fake Bethlehem as the birthplace, they should have had removed it by saying that itis common knowledge that a) he was not born at that alleged place and b) nothing extraordinary but shameful occurred about his birth. However, nobody is perfect and Christian impostors and/or desperadoes, not at all. One never can say what mistake a liar will do but that the liar will do some. One can absolutely say that a liar always will do mistakes unmasking him. Christians catch themselves liars in this case.

In addition, that means that the Christian gospels do not report the facts about the birth of their foremost blackguard, they lifted up to their "god" but solely are faking the facts how it should have happened if the Christians’ desperadoes' head (Jesus) would be the promised Jewish redeemer. What did not happen that does not interest those skillful conjurers like the Christian desperadoes but solely that what should have happened if their lies were truths. The Christian gospel writers fake and “compose“ the facts as if the top felon from the death row (Jesus) would be the promised Jewish savior. However, what should have happened and what really occurred are quite different stories. In those days when his underlings were unable to put upside down, e.g., fobbing off lies as "truths" and truth as "lies", it was common that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem.
 

The desperadoes' belief shift mountains and the truths and facts, anyway – doesn’t it? They are just interested in passing off their lies as "truths" so that their lies are reputed as "truths". In case of an “emergency” always (a fabricated) wonder "occurs" at the right moment… At first, they put the question: What is necessary to lift up our chieftain to the god? The desperadoes' concoctions of "miracles" shall make their prey switch off brain and reason!
So, let us ask what is necessary to lift up the Christian foremost desperado (Jesus) to the god. According to John 7:42, we already quoted there were said two conditions:

 

·        Firstly) he must be a descendant of King David and

·        secondly) born in Bethlehem.

What do the Christian desperadoes do? They allege all and lie that firstly) Jesus was born in Bethlehem and secondly) was a descendant of King David – not of Roman mercenary Pandera – as we will demonstrate in the next chapter. They even are that obsessed so that they are unable to notice that both lies contradict each other, conclusively debunk the allegations as lies, reciprocally.

Mt 1:1-17 RSV

1 ¶ The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

 2  Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,

 3  and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Ram,

 4  and Ram the father of Amminadab, and Amminadab the father of Nahshon, and Nahshon the father of Salmon,

 5  and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse,

 6  and Jesse the father of David the king. And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah,

 7  and Solomon the father of Rehoboam, and Rehoboam the father of Abijah, and Abijah the father of Asa,

 8  and Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, and Joram the father of Uzziah,

 9  and Uzziah the father of Jotham, and Jotham the father of Ahaz, and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,

 10  and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos, and Amos the father of Josiah,

 11  and Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon.

 12  And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Shealtiel, and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,

 13  and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor,

 14  and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud,

 15  and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob,

 16  and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.

17    So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations

Ah, ah, ah! What a nice ancestry for a desperado and felon from the death row!
According to those lies of lineage Joseph would have sired Jesus - and god is no father of him. Therefore, the Christian desperadoes' word that is worldwide sold as “God’s word” contradicts itself. If the top blackguard (Jesus) descends from king David, god could not have been begotten him. One reader wrote to the author that in Mt. 1:16 it is not written that Joseph is the father of Jesus. Matthew just wanted to make clear what a nice ancestry Joseph -- Mary's husband -- had...
However, there is no failure of evidence.

John, who doesn't know anything about the cribbed  stories of "immaculate birth" and "The Star of Bethlehem" from competing and later -- by the Christians -- murdered  Mithras religion calls Jesus   "Joseph's son":

Joh 1:45 RSV

45 Philip found Nathanael, and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."

My word, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Josef...! What a flattery for a product shameful adultery...! This is the "god", who shall be the father of this miscarriage and mind of nature, which the Christians puff up as "Jesus Christ"...! I am already impressed...!

One never knows what trickeries a “god" or shoddy Christian conjurer always has in stock... Finally, there is much at stake...
In that way, as the Christians claim the top felon from the death row being "son of god" and "begotten by god" one can also claim Satan or Al Capone, Stalin, Jack the Ripper and Adolph Hitler as sired by god and to be “sons of god“... However, if god had been begotten Satan's Anointed One (Greek: Christos and thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ") the latter cannot descend from King David because the ancestry of Mt 1: 1-17 is not directed to Mary. Moreover, the efforts of shamming that Jesus is the promised Jewish Messiah are in vain because t the promised Messiah is a descendent of king David means that the Jewish Messiah

  • neither originates from adultery nor from an immaculate birth that – more over - never happened on earth. Christian desperadoes do mark my words!

 The Christians' foremost impostor (Jesus) does not descend from king David but from adultery of Mary with a Roman soldier while already being betrothed with later husband Joseph. The desperadoes allege everything that is useful to make him appear in favorable light but not the facts. Here, there is the simple intention to put that shammed prophet and faking "god" corresponding with patterns of an expected Messiah. If a god would have mated Mary – instead of Joseph Pandera – then never such an ugly creep n' crook like Jesus would have crept out of Mary’s womb. Is god of such bad a genotype? Well, this tale fits a birth of Satan's Anointed One (Greek: Christos). Who says that the Christians do not address and worship Satan as "god"? Because they do not call Satan Satan but "god"...? That ugly, ill-favored, misshapen, ignoble, irascible, sneaky, furtive and depraved creep n' crook is a flop of nature befitting Satan as father... Now we can understand why he was lying that "god" purportedly dotes on all his failures of creation… and why his fellow barbarians concealed almost everything about his biography and what they did not camouflage they flatly lied.

Even baptism of Jesus by John debunks the lie about "virgin birth" and "god" as the scapegoat for Mary's adultery. The baptism of Jesus the Nazareth should symbolize the beginning of his virginity and the reputed selection as "god's son" whereas the gospel writers fail to see that they start that "virginity" and selection by "god" already with the foremost impostor's birth. They do not grasp that baptism would be redundant and without any sense if "virginity" and "selection by god" already would have started before or with his birth. "God" allegedly sired a miscarriage of nature that first was to be purified by baptism ... Those are the silly lies of Christian desperadoes...! This once more demonstrates how the Christian sect mixes up God and Satan...


 Because of the statistics, we should mention that firstly in the 6th century Caesarius of Arles lifted up the magicians of the Mithras religion (competing) sect as kings. Secondly, in the 9th century, they had been awarded names like Casper, Melcher and Balthasar "… The names were fabricated by a “miracle“, i.e. out of thin air…! So, where there is nothing obsessive impostors see much according to the topmost credo: faith shifts mountains (see: Mt 17:20, Mt 21:21, Lu 17:6) and the truths anyway. In addition, where there is much, for example, many lies, much deception, self-deception, malice, nastiness, terror, psycho-terror and other innumerable atrocities, the Christian barbarians see nothing. That is why the desperadoes’ faith shifts mountains and a star that does not exist to Bethlehem, anyway!
There was no star of Bethlehem since there was no birth of humankind's top in Bethlehem
 

Mt 24:28 NKJV

 "For wherever the carcass is, there the eagles will be gathered together.

In addition, wherever there is Ben-Pandera (thieves' cant: Jesus "Christ", "son of god" etc.) the depraved, blackguards, the scum of the earth, rogues with frocks and without frocks, desperadoes, terrorists and all other sorts of criminals, i.e. Christians, gather.

PREVIOUS |HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS | NEWS | THE GOD DECEPTION| THE CROSS DECEPTION | CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRIST WHAT DID JESUS LOOK LIKE?  | MY STUFF | NEXT |

© 1998 - 2008 HANS HENNING ATROTT - All rights reserved. - Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.